Original Contributions
Psychologic morbidity and health-related quality of life of patients assessed in a chest pain observation unit*,**

Presented at the British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine annual meeting, Bournemouth, United Kingdom, April 2001.
https://doi.org/10.1067/mem.2001.118010Get rights and content

Abstract

Study Objectives: We sought to measure psychologic morbidity and health-related quality of life among patients attending the hospital with acute chest pain both at presentation and 1 month after rigorous assessment for cardiac disease. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing assessment on the chest pain observation unit of a large, urban emergency department were asked to complete 3 questionnaires: the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), the Euroqol Health Utility Questionnaire, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. The same questionnaires were mailed 1 month later, along with a questionnaire documenting subsequent pain and reassurance. Results: At enrollment (n=166), 32 (19%) participants (95% confidence interval [CI] 15% to 26%) were experiencing moderate levels of anxiety, and 21 (13%, 95% CI 8% to 19%) were experiencing moderate levels of depression. Health utility and all SF-36 dimensions of quality of life were substantially below age-adjusted normal values. One month after assessment (n=110), only the Pain dimension score of SF-36 had significantly improved. Most scores were unchanged, and the Physical Role and Mental Health dimension scores of SF-36 had significantly deteriorated. Seventy (64%) patients (95% CI 54% to 72%) had further pain after discharge. Despite these findings, 98 (86%) patients (95% CI 78% to 91%) responded that their assessment was “completely reassuring” or “quite reassuring.” Conclusion: Patients with acute, undifferentiated chest pain have substantial psychologic morbidity and impairment of quality of life. Although patients respond that they are reassured by chest pain observation unit assessment, anxiety and depression remain prevalent and quality of life remains impaired 1 month after assessment. [Goodacre S, Mason S, Arnold J, Angelini K. Psychologic morbidity and health-related quality of life of patients assessed in a chest pain observation unit. Ann Emerg Med. October 2001;38:369-376.]

Introduction

Chest pain is a common cause for presentation at the emergency department.1 Management is principally aimed at identifying patients with potentially life-threatening illness, such as acute myocardial infarction, rather than establishing a definitive diagnosis in all cases. Hence, a substantial proportion of patients have no clear diagnosis after their initial assessment.

The chest pain observation unit (CPOU) is a recent development in the assessment of acute chest pain.2 Patients whose chest pain is undiagnosed by clinical assessment, ECG, or chest radiography undergo a period of intensive observation and investigation, culminating in provocative cardiac testing when appropriate. Those patients with no evidence of serious physical illness may be discharged home.

The effectiveness of this assessment in terms of detecting cardiac disease is now well established.3 Follow-up of patients assessed on a CPOU has shown that missed cardiac pathology is rare.1, 3 However, most patients assessed on a CPOU will not have cardiac disease. Evaluation of CPOU care to date has therefore focused on outcomes that are not directly relevant to most patients receiving CPOU care.

Psychologic disturbance is common among patients with chest pain.4, 5 The relationship between psychologic illness and chest pain with normal coronary arteries is well established in the cardiology outpatient setting, with panic disorder being present in 30% or more of patients with chest pain but without significant coronary artery disease.4, 5 Studies of patients presenting to the ED with acute chest pain6, 7, 8 have demonstrated a prevalence of 20% to 25% for panic disorder and a similar prevalence for depression. Admitted patients (thereby a selected group) typically have persistent chest pain and psychiatric problems after discharge,9, 10, 11 which may last for many years and appear to worsen after assessment.9 It is unclear whether important psychologic symptoms persist after evaluation and discharge of unselected patients with acute chest pain or what effect these psychologic symptoms have on quality of life.

Clinicians may be aware of anxiety in their patients, but they may ascribe it to concern regarding an acute cardiac problem and may assume that anxiety will subside with thorough physical evaluation and reassurance. We suspect this assumption may be widespread among clinicians. Certainly, psychologic outcomes and quality of life are rarely measured in the CPOU literature, suggesting they are not considered to be important. Yet there is little evidence to support any assumption that anxiety will resolve and quality of life will improve with thorough diagnostic assessment.

Before the advent of CPOU care, Sox et al12 randomized 176 patients thought clinically to have nonspecific chest pain to have either routine ECG and creatinine kinase measurement or no diagnostic testing. Short-term disability was decreased and satisfaction with care was increased in the tested group, but there was no difference in anxiety about serious disease. The evaluation of nonspecific chest pain and the techniques available for measuring anxiety and quality of life have advanced considerably since this study was published. CPOU assessment increases diagnostic certainty,13 which might allow the clinician to give more definite reassurance. This has been linked to improved patient satisfaction after CPOU assessment.14 However, we are not aware of any study that has evaluated psychologic symptoms or quality of life after CPOU care.

We therefore need to know more about patient-centered outcomes in CPOU care. We need to know the prevalence of psychologic disturbance in the CPOU population and whether any such disturbance persists after thorough physical evaluation. We also need to know whether chest pain is associated with impaired quality of life and whether chest pain and impaired quality of life persist after discharge. If so, future evaluation of CPOU services will need to consider the effect of intervention on those with noncardiac, as well as cardiac, chest pain and measure a wider range of outcomes than cardiac events and mortality.

This study aims to quantify psychologic morbidity and health-related quality of life in a group of patients investigated for acute, undifferentiated chest pain, both before and after intensive cardiac investigation.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

Our urban teaching hospital ED sees approximately 75,000 new patients per year, of whom approximately 4% have chest pain. Patients presenting with chest pain between 9 AM and 9 PM with a low (approximately 5%) but not negligible risk of myocardial infarction are examined in the CPOU. Approximately 25% of patients with chest pain are suitable for CPOU care: 18% present between 9 AM and 9 PM and are assessed on CPOU, and 7% present after hours. Those with diagnostic ECG changes (approximately 10%

Results

Two hundred fifty patients were referred from the ED to the CPOU between October 18, 1999, and April 18, 2000. One hundred sixty-eight (67.2%) were enrolled in the study. Unfortunately, the reasons for exclusion were not accurately recorded, and therefore, proportions for each exclusion criterion cannot be reported. All 168 patients were sent a follow-up questionnaire, and 119 (70.8%) completed follow-up. The characteristics and final diagnoses of those who were enrolled and those who completed

Discussion

This study confirms the high prevalence of psychologic morbidity previously reported in patients presenting with acute chest pain.6, 7, 8 Our estimates for the prevalence of anxiety and depression at presentation (19% and 13%, respectively) are slightly lower than previously reported estimates6, 7, 8 for panic disorder and depression (both 20% to 25%) but still indicate considerable morbidity. The prevalence of anxiety and depression are essentially unchanged 1 month after CPOU evaluation.

We

Acknowledgements

Author contributions: The study was conceived by SG and designed by SG and SM. Recruitment and data collection were undertaken by JA and KA. Data analysis was undertaken by SG and SM. SG drafted the manuscript and all authors contributed to revision. SG takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

References (31)

  • RP Fleet et al.

    Panic disorder, chest pain and coronary artery disease: literature review

    Can J Cardiol

    (1994)
  • LR Wulsin et al.

    Axis I disorders in ER patients with atypical chest pain

    Int J Psychiatry Med

    (1991)
  • KW Yingling et al.

    Estimated prevalences of panic disorder and depression among consecutive patients seen in an emergency department with acute chest pain

    J Gen Intern Med

    (1993)
  • SR Kisely et al.

    The course of psychiatric disorder associated with non-specific chest pain

    J Psychosom Res

    (1991)
  • M Roll et al.

    Five-year follow-up of young adults visiting an emergency unit because of atypical chest pain

    J Intern Med

    (1992)
  • Cited by (59)

    • Depression is associated with recurrent chest pain with or without coronary artery disease: A prospective cohort study in the emergency department

      2017, American Heart Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Second, we found high rates of psychological morbidity in chest pain patients presenting to the ED. The rates of depression and anxiety were higher than previously reported.5,8 Specifically, anxiety was highly prevalent in our chest pain population, whereas the prevalence of anxiety was only slightly higher than depression in prior reports.8

    • Implicit affective evaluation of somatosensory sensations in patients with noncardiac chest pain

      2014, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Somatic symptoms are common in primary and secondary medical care with chest pain being one of the most frequently reported complaints (Kroenke & Price, 1993), often leading to negative affective reactions such as concerns and fear (Goodacre, Mason, Arnold, & Angelini, 2001).

    • Satisfaction and emergency department revisits in patients with possible acute coronary syndrome

      2013, Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Finally, results may not be generalizable to nonteaching EDs or to EDs with chest pain observation units. Chest pain observation units have been previously shown to streamline workup and to improve satisfaction in ED patients with possible ACS (51−53). In the face of growing pressures to increase throughput, improving patients' satisfaction with the ED encounter represents an opportunity to reduce the occurrence of costly ED return visits, to increase hospital continuity of care, and to improve satisfaction with overall care.

    • Depressive symptoms and healthcare utilization in patients with noncardiac chest pain compared to patients with ischemic heart disease

      2012, Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care
      Citation Excerpt :

      We found that more than 25% of the total sample demonstrated depressive symptoms at both baseline and at follow-up. Other studies reported prevalence frequencies of depression in 20% to 50 % of patients with chest pain.7,23,38,39 This prevalence is much higher than in the general population, where the depression rate lies between 10% and 15%.40,41

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    Author contributions are provided at the end of this article.

    **

    Address for reprints: Steve Goodacre, MRCP, 87a Sydney Road, Sheffield, S6 3GG, United Kingdom; 0114 222 0842, fax 0114 222 0749;,E-mail [email protected].

    View full text