Endoscopy 2009; 41(11): 941-951
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1215179
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Colonoscopy perforation rate, mechanisms and outcome: from diagnostic to therapeutic colonoscopy

V.  Panteris1 , J.  Haringsma1 , E.  J.  Kuipers1
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
28 October 2009 (online)

Background and aim: Perforation of the colon as a result of endoscopic manipulation is considered a severe adverse event. The goal of this review is to present the expected incidence of perforation in relation to varying levels of difficulty in endoscopic exploration and polypectomy together with the whole context of mechanisms, predisposing factors, diagnosis, and the strategic management plan.

Methods: An extensive search was undertaken in the Medline database for recent articles (published from 2000 onwards) in the English language using specific terms relating to the reported frequency of perforation during diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy in various medical settings and including morbidity, mortality, and appropriate management. Additional articles were retrieved irrespective of publication date to supplement where necessary data on important issues such as mechanisms of perforation, risk factors, diagnosis, and prevention.

Results: The frequency of perforation was found to be 1 in 1400 for overall colonoscopies and 1 in 1000 for therapeutic colonoscopies. Varying perforation rates have been estimated for polypectomies, endoscopic mucosal resections, and endoscopic submucosal dissections. The mortality has dropped to 0 % in most studies, with the highest reported percentage being 0.02 %. Advanced age, female sex, the presence of multiple co-morbidities, diverticulosis, and bowel obstruction have been shown to increase the risk of perforation. The decision between surgery and nonoperative treatment will depend on the type of injury, the quality of bowel preparation, the underlying colonic pathology, and the clinical stability of the patient.

Conclusion: The perforation rate has declined in recent years in relation to more historical series, but there is now an increasing trend as a consequence of advanced interventional endoscopy. Awareness and experience are the only preventive measures that can limit the incidence of perforation.

References

  • 1 Fatima H, Rex D K. Minimizing endoscopic complications: colonoscopic polypectomy.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2007;  17 145-156, viii
  • 2 Citarda F, Tomaselli G, Capocaccia R. et al . Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence.  Gut. 2001;  48 812-815
  • 3 Levine J S, Ahnen D J. Clinical practice. Adenomatous polyps of the colon.  N Engl J Med. 2006;  355 2551-2557
  • 4 Davila R E, Rajan E, Baron T H. et al . ASGE guideline: colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 546-557
  • 5 Rex D K, Bond J H, Winawer S. et al . Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;  97 1296-1308
  • 6 Rex D K, Petrini J L, Baron T H. et al . Quality indicators for colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 S16-S28
  • 7 Wullstein C, Koppen M, Gross E. Laparoscopic treatment of colonic perforations related to colonoscopy.  Surg Endosc. 1999;  13 484-487
  • 8 Luning T H, Keemers-Gels M E, Barendregt W B. et al . Colonoscopic perforations: a review of 30,366 patients.  Surg Endosc. 2007;  21 994-997
  • 9 Waye J D, Kahn O, Auerbach M E. Complications of colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1996;  6 343-377
  • 10 Damore L J, Rantis P C, Vernava A M. et al . Colonoscopic perforations. Etiology, diagnosis, and management.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 1308-1314
  • 11 Anderson M L, Pasha T M, Leighton J A. Endoscopic perforation of the colon: lessons from a 10-year study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;  95 3418-3422
  • 12 Tran D Q, Rosen L, Kim R. et al . Actual colonoscopy: what are the risks of perforation?.  Am Surg. 2001;  67 845-847
  • 13 Gatto N M, Frucht H, Sundararajan V. et al . Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study.  J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;  95 230-236
  • 14 Gondal G, Grotmol T, Hofstad B. et al . The Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP) screening study: baseline findings and implementations for clinical work-up in age groups 50 – 64 years.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003;  38 635-642
  • 15 Korman L Y, Overholt B F, Box T. et al . Perforation during colonoscopy in endoscopic ambulatory surgical centers.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  58 554-557
  • 16 Misra T, Lalor E, Fedorak R N. Endoscopic perforation rates at a Canadian university teaching hospital.  Can J Gastroenterol. 2004;  18 221-226
  • 17 Cobb W S, Heniford B T, Sigmon L B. et al . Colonoscopic perforations: incidence management and outcomes.  Am Surg. 2004;  70 750-757
  • 18 Iqbal C W, Chun Y S, Farley D R. Colonoscopic perforations: a retrospective review.  J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;  9 1229-1235
  • 19 Tulchinsky H, Madhala-Givon O, Wasserberg N. et al . Incidence and management of colonoscopic perforations: 8 years’ experience.  World J Gastroenterol. 2006;  12 4211-4213
  • 20 Rathgaber S W, Wick T M. Colonoscopy completion and complication rates in a community gastroenterology practice.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 556-562
  • 21 Levin T R, Zhao W, Conell C. et al . Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated health care delivery system.  Ann Intern Med. 2006;  145 880-886
  • 22 Heldwein W, Dollhopf M, Rosch T. et al . The Munich Polypectomy Study (MUPS): prospective analysis of complications and risk factors in 4000 colonic snare polypectomies.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 1116-1122
  • 23 Sieg A, Hachmoeller-Eisenbach U, Eisenbach T. Prospective evaluation of complications in outpatient GI endoscopy: a survey among German gastroenterologists.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 620-627
  • 24 Nelson D B, McQuaid K R, Bond J H. et al . Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 307-314
  • 25 Rabeneck L, Paszat L F, Hilsden R J. et al . Bleeding and perforation after outpatient colonoscopy and their risk factors in usual clinical practice.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  135 1899-1906
  • 26 Arebi N, Swain D, Suzuki N. et al . Endoscopic mucosal resection of 161 cases of large sessile or flat colorectal polyps.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007;  42 859-866
  • 27 Conio M, Repici A, Demarquay J F. et al . EMR of large sessile colorectal polyps.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 234-241
  • 28 Bories E, Pesenti C, Monges G. et al . Endoscopic mucosal resection for advanced sessile adenoma and early-stage colorectal carcinoma.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 231-235
  • 29 Jameel J K, Pillinger S H, Moncur P. et al . Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in the management of large colo-rectal polyps.  Colorectal Dis. 2006;  8 497-500
  • 30 Ahmad N A, Kochman M L, Long W B. et al . Efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection: a study of 101 cases.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 390-396
  • 31 Bergmann U, Beger H G. Endoscopic mucosal resection for advanced non-polypoid colorectal adenoma and early stage carcinoma.  Surg Endosc. 2003;  17 475-479
  • 32 Higaki S, Hashimoto S, Harada K. et al . Long-term follow-up of large flat colorectal tumors resected endoscopically.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 845-849
  • 33 Hurlstone D P, Sanders D S, Cross S S. et al . Colonoscopic resection of lateral spreading tumours: a prospective analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection.  Gut. 2004;  53 1334-1339
  • 34 Hurlstone D P, Cross S S, Drew K. et al . An evaluation of colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection using high-magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 491-498
  • 35 Iishi H, Tatsuta M, Iseki K. et al . Endoscopic piecemeal resection with submucosal saline injection of large sessile colorectal polyps.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 697-700
  • 36 Kaltenbach T, Friedland S, Maheshwari A. et al . Short- and long-term outcomes of standardized EMR of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal lesions ≥ 1 cm (with video).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 857-865
  • 37 Katsinelos P, Kountouras J, Paroutoglou G. et al . Endoscopic mucosal resection of large sessile colorectal polyps with submucosal injection of hypertonic 50 percent dextrose-epinephrine solution.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;  49 1384-1392
  • 38 Su M Y, Hsu C M, Ho Y P. et al . Endoscopic mucosal resection for colonic non-polypoid neoplasms.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;  100 2174-2179
  • 39 Tamura S, Nakajo K, Yokoyama Y. et al . Evaluation of endoscopic mucosal resection for laterally spreading rectal tumors.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 306-312
  • 40 Tanaka S, Haruma K, Oka S. et al . Clinicopathologic features and endoscopic treatment of superficially spreading colorectal neoplasms larger than 20 mm.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 62-66
  • 41 Tung S Y, Wu C S. Clinical outcome of endoscopically removed early colorectal cancer.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;  18 1175-1179
  • 42 Wei S C, Chang Y T, Shieh M J. et al . The clinical and endoscopic characteristics, treatment, and long-term prognosis of early colorectal cancer in Taiwan.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;  50 856-860
  • 43 Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Nakamura M. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal epithelial neoplasia.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 493-497
  • 44 Onozato Y, Ishihara H, Iizuka H. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancers and large flat adenomas.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 980-986
  • 45 Tanaka S, Oka S, Kaneko I. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: possibility of standardization.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 100-107
  • 46 Tamegai Y, Saito Y, Masaki N. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection: a safe technique for colorectal tumors.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 418-422
  • 47 Saito Y, Uraoka T, Matsuda T. et al . Endoscopic treatment of large superficial colorectal tumors: a case series of 200 endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 966-973
  • 48 Hurlstone D P, Atkinson R, Sanders D S. et al . Achieving R0 resection in the colorectum using endoscopic submucosal dissection.  Br J Surg. 2007;  94 1536-1542
  • 49 Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kakushima N. et al . Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms in 200 consecutive cases.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;  5 678-683
  • 50 Lohsiriwat V, Sujarittanakarn S, Akaraviputh T. et al . Colonoscopic perforation: a report from World Gastroenterology Organization endoscopy training center in Thailand.  World J Gastroenterol. 2008;  14 6722-6725
  • 51 Gomes O A, de Souza R R, Liberti E A. A preliminary investigation of the effects of aging on the nerve cell number in the myenteric ganglia of the human colon.  Gerontology. 1997;  43 210-217
  • 52 Hanani M, Fellig Y, Udassin R, Freund H R. Age-related changes in the morphology of the myenteric plexus of the human colon.  Auton Neurosci. 2004;  113 71-78
  • 53 Dafnis G, Ekbom A, Pahlman L. et al . Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy within a defined population in Sweden.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 302-309
  • 54 Chino A, Karasawa T, Uragami N. et al . A comparison of depth of tissue injury caused by different modes of electrosurgical current in a pig colon model.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 374-379
  • 55 Savides T J, See J A, Jensen D M. et al . Randomized controlled study of injury in the canine right colon from simultaneous biopsy and coagulation with different hot biopsy forceps.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  42 573-578
  • 56 Carpenter S, Petersen B T, Chuttani R. et al . Polypectomy devices.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 741-749
  • 57 Wadas D D, Sanowski R A. Complications of the hot biopsy forceps technique.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1988;  34 32-37
  • 58 Peluso F, Goldner F. Follow-up of hot biopsy forceps treatment of diminutive colonic polyps.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 604-606
  • 59 Mann N S, Mann S K, Alam I. The safety of hot biopsy forceps in the removal of small colonic polyps.  Digestion. 1999;  60 74-76
  • 60 Deenadayalu V P, Rex D K. Colon polyp retrieval after cold snaring.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 253-256
  • 61 Tappero G, Gaia E, De Giuli P. et al . Cold snare excision of small colorectal polyps.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;  38 310-313
  • 62 Dominitz J A, Eisen G M, Baron T H. et al . Complications of colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 441-445
  • 63 Brooker J C, Saunders B P, Shah S G. et al . Treatment with argon plasma coagulation reduces recurrence after piecemeal resection of large sessile colonic polyps: a randomized trial and recommendations.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 371-375
  • 64 Regula J, Wronska E, Polkowski M. et al . Argon plasma coagulation after piecemeal polypectomy of sessile colorectal adenomas: long-term follow-up study.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 212-218
  • 65 Ben Soussan E, Mathieu N, Roque I. et al . Bowel explosion with colonic perforation during argon plasma coagulation for hemorrhagic radiation-induced proctitis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 412-413
  • 66 Manes G, Imbesi V, Bianchi-Porro G. Pneumoperitoneum after argon plasma coagulation treatment: perforation or accumulation of air in the cavity?.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 (Suppl. 1) E98
  • 67 Manner H, Plum N, Pech O. et al . Colon explosion during argon plasma coagulation.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 1123-1127
  • 68 Foliente R L, Chang A C, Youssef A I. et al . Endoscopic cecal perforation: mechanisms of injury.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;  91 705-708
  • 69 Christie J, Marrazzo J III. ”Mini-perforation” of the colon – not all postpolypectomy perforations require laparotomy.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;  34 132-135
  • 70 Raju G S, Shibukawa G, Ahmed I. et al . Endoluminal suturing may overcome the limitations of clip closure of a gaping wide colon perforation (with videos).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 906-911
  • 71 Farley D R, Bannon M P, Zietlow S P. et al . Management of colonoscopic perforations.  Mayo Clin Proc. 1997;  72 729-733
  • 72 Gedebou T M, Wong R A, Rappaport W D. et al . Clinical presentation and management of iatrogenic colon perforations.  Am J Surg. 1996;  172 454-457
  • 73 Kriwanek S, Armbruster C, Beckerhinn P. et al . Prognostic factors for survival in colonic perforation.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 1994;  9 158-162
  • 74 Hansen A J, Tessier D J, Anderson M L. et al . Laparoscopic repair of colonoscopic perforations: indications and guidelines.  J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;  11 655-659
  • 75 VanGossum A, Cozzoli A, Adler M. et al . Colonoscopic snare polypectomy: analysis of 1485 resections comparing two types of current.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;  38 472-475
  • 76 Parra-Blanco A, Kaminaga N, Kojima T. et al . Colonoscopic polypectomy with cutting current: is it safe?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 676-681
  • 77 Singh N, Harrison M, Rex D K. A survey of colonoscopic polypectomy practices among clinical gastroenterologists.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 414-418
  • 78 Gilbert D A, DiMarino A J, Jensen D M. et al . Status evaluation: hot biopsy forceps. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Technology Assessment Committee.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;  38 753-756
  • 79 Monkemuller K E, Fry L C, Jones B H. et al . Histological quality of polyps resected using the cold versus hot biopsy technique.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 432-436
  • 80 Yoshikane H, Hidano H, Sakakibara A. et al . Endoscopic repair by clipping of iatrogenic colonic perforation.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  46 464-466
  • 81 Taku K, Sano Y, Fu K I, Saito Y. Iatrogenic perforation at therapeutic colonoscopy: should the endoscopist attempt closure using endoclips or transfer immediately to surgery?.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 428
  • 82 Mana F, De Vogelaere K, Urban D. Iatrogenic perforation of the colon during diagnostic colonoscopy: endoscopic treatment with clips.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 258-259
  • 83 The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  58 (Suppl. 6) S3-43

V. PanterisMD 

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center

St. Ellados 59
13231 Athens
Greece

Fax: +30–210–5011944

Email: skepsios@soon.com

    >