Skip to main content
Log in

Conceptual models of psychological distress among low-income patients in an inner-city primary care clinic

  • Populations At Risk
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although depression and anxiety syndromes are common in primary care, many depressed and anxious patients fail to receive effective treatment. Little attention has been given to the role of illness beliefs in shaping these patients’ treatment preferences and decisions. Using semistructured interviews, this study examined conceptual models of depressive symptoms among patients in an inner-city clinic. A theoretical taxonomy of patients’ conceptual models of distress was developed: each category was associated with a unique pattern of treatment preferences. We conclude that patients’ models of distress may play an important role in treatment-seeking decisions, and deserve further investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Katon W, Rutter C, Ludman EJ, et al. A randomized trial of relapse prevention of depression in primary care. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:241–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lin E, VonKorff M, Katon W, et al. The role of the primary care physician in patients’ adherence to antidepressant therapy. Med Care. 1995;33:67–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Simon GE, Goldberg SD, Tiemens BG, Ustun TB. Outcomes of recognized and unrecognized depression in an international primary care study. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1999;21:97–105.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Katon W, VonKorff M, Lin E, Bush T, Ormel J. Adequacy and duration of antidepressant treatment in primary care. Med Care. 1992;30:67–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Weiss M, Raguram R, Channabasavanna S. Cultural dimensions of psychiatric diagnosis: a comparison of DSM-III-R and illness explanatory models in South India. Br J Psychiatry. 1995;166:353–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldberg D, Gater R, Sartorius N, et al. The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychiatry Med. 1997;27:191–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Baumann LJ, Cameron L, Zimmerman RS, Leventhal H. Illness representations and matching labels with symptoms. Health Psychol. 1989;8:449–69.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kleinman A, Eisenberg L, Good B. Culture, illness, and care: clinical lessons from anthropologic and cross-culture research. Ann Intern Med. 1978;88:251–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alison Karasz PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karasz, A., Sacajiu, G. & Garcia, N. Conceptual models of psychological distress among low-income patients in an inner-city primary care clinic. J GEN INTERN MED 18, 475–477 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20636.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20636.x

Key words

Navigation