Skip to main content
Log in

How are patients’ specific ambulatory care experiences related to trust, satisfaction, and considering changing physicians?

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

CONTEXT: Few data are available regarding the consequences of patients’ problems with interpersonal aspects of medical care.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationships between outpatient problem experiences and patients’ trust in their physicians, ratings of their physicians, and consideration of changing physicians. We classified as problem experiences patients’ reports that their physician does not always 1) give them enough time to explain the reason for the visit, 2) give answers to questions that are understandable, 3) take enough time to answer questions, 4) ask about how their family or living situation affects their health, 5) give as much medical information as they want, or 6) involve them in decisions as much as they want.

DESIGN: Telephone survey during 1997.

PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=2,052; 58% response) insured by a large national health insurer.

MEASUREMENTS: Patient trust, overall ratings of physicians, and having considered changing physicians.

RESULTS: Most patients (78%) reported at least 1 problem experience. In multivariable analyses, each problem experience was independently associated with lower trust (all P<.001) and 5 of 6 with lower overall ratings (P<.001). Three problem experiences were independently related to considering changing physicians: physicians not always giving answers to questions that are understandable (odds ratio [OR], 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 3.0), not always taking enough time to answer questions (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 2.2 to 5.2), and not always giving enough medical information (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 2.4 to 6.6).

CONCLUSIONS: Problem experiences in the ambulatory setting are strongly related to lower trust. Several are also associated with lower overall ratings and with considering changing physicians, particularly problems related to communication of health information. Efforts to improve patients’ experiences may promote more trusting relationships and greater continuity and therefore should be a priority for physicians, educators, and health care organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware JE. Expanding patient involvement in care. Effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 1985;102:520–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Ware JE. Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease [published erratum appears in Med Care 1989 July 27:679]. Med Care. 1989;27(3 suppl):110–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lerman CE, Brody DS, Caputo GC, Smith DG, Lazaro CG, Wolfson HG. Patients’ Perceived Involvement in Care Scale: relationship to attitudes about illness and medical care. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5:29–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Levinson W, Roter D. The effects of two continuing medical education programs on communication skills of practicing primary care physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8:318–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. Can Med Assoc J. 1995;152:1423–33.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Roter DL, Hall JA, Kern DE, Barker LR, Cole KA, Roca RP. Improving physicians’ interviewing skills and reducing patients’ emotional distress. A randomized clinical trial. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:1877–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Putnam SM, Lipkin M. The patient-centered interview: research support. In: Lipkin M, Putnam SM, Lazare A, eds. The Medical Interview—Clinical Care, Education, and Research. New York, NY: Springer; 1995:530–7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Gandek B, Rogers WH, Ware JE. Characteristics of physicians with participatory decision-making styles. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:497–504.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Goold SD, Lipkin M. The doctor-patient relationship. Challenges, opportunities, and strategies. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:26S-33S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Clark W, Lipkin M, Graman H, Shorey J. Improving physicians’ relationships with patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:45S-50S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cooper-Patrick L, Gallo JJ, Gonzales JJ, et al. Race, gender, and partnership in the patient-physician relationship. JAMA. 1999;282:583–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Levinson W, Gorawara-Bhat R, Dueck R, et al. Resolving disagreements in the patient-physician relationship: tools for improving communication in managed care. JAMA. 1999;282:1477–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Thom DH, Ribisl KM, Stewart AL, Luke DA. The Stanford Trust Study Physicians. Further validation and reliability testing of the Trust in Physician Scale. Med Care. 1999;37:510–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gabel LL, Lucas JB, Westbury RC. Why do patients continue to see the same physicians? Fam Pract Res J. 1993;13:133–47.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cleary PD. The increasing importance of patient surveys. BMJ. 1999;319:720–1.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cleary PD, Edgman-Levitan S, Roberts M, et al. Patients evaluate their hospital care: a national survey. Health Aff (Millwood). 1991;10:254–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cleary PD, Edgman-Levitan S, Walker JD, Gerteis M, Delbanco TL. Using patient reports to improve medical care: a preliminary report from 10 hospitals. Qual Manag Health Care. 1993;Fall:31–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kao AC, Green DC, Zaslavsky AM, Koplan JP, Cleary PD. The relationship between method of physician payment and patient trust. JAMA. 1998;280:1708–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cleary PD, Edgman-Levitan S, McMullen W, Delbanco TL. The relationship between reported problems and patient summary evaluations of hospital care. Qual Rev Bull. 1992;18:53–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Edgman-Levitan S, Cleary PD. What information do consumers want and need? Health Aff (Millwood). 1996;15:42–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Anderson LA, Dedrick RF. Development of the Trust in Physician scale: a measure to assess interpersonal trust in patient-physician relationships. Psychol Rep. 1990;67:1091–100.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Janoff-Bulman R. Assumptive worlds and the stress of traumatic events: applications of the schema construct. Soc Cogn. 1993;7:113–36.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Huber PJ. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under non-standard conditions. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium in Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press; 1967:221–33.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Localio AR, Berlin JA, Ten Have TR, Kimmel SE. Adjustments for center in multicenter studies: an overview. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:112–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cleary PD, Edgman-Levitan S. Health care quality. Incorporating consumer perspectives. JAMA. 1997;278:1608–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hall JA, Roter DL, Katz NR. Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behavior in medical encounters. Med Care. 1988;26:657–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Krupat E, Fancey M, Cleary PD. Information and its impact on satisfaction among surgical patients. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:1817–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Robbins JA, Bertakis KD, Helms LJ, Azari R, Callahan EJ, Creten DA. The influence of physician practice behaviors on patient satisfaction. Fam Med. 1993;25:17–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Waitzkin H. Doctor-patient communication. Clinical implications of social scientific research. JAMA. 1984;252:2441–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Laine C, Davidoff F, Lewis CE, et al. Important elements of outpatient care: a comparison of patients’ and physicians’ opinions. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:640–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Beckman HB, Frankel RM. The effect of physician behavior on the collection of data. Ann Intern Med. 1984;101:692–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Marvel MK, Epstein RM, Flowers K, Beckman HB. Soliciting the patient’s agenda: have we improved? JAMA. 1999;281:283–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Rosenthal GE, Shannon SE. The use of patient perceptions in the evaluation of health-care delivery systems. Med Care. 1997;35:NS58–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, Moskowitz MA. Measuring patients’ desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:23–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Benbassat J, Pilpel D, Tidhar M. Patients’ preferences for participation in clinical decision making: a review of published surveys. Behav Med. 1998;24:81–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Deber RB, Kraetschmer N, Irvine J. What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making? Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1414–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Arora NK, McHorney CA. Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate? Med Care. 2000;38:335–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Grumbach K, Selby JV, Damberg C, et al. Resolving the gatekeeper conundrum. What patients value in primary care and referrals to specialists. JAMA. 1999;282:261–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kerr EA, Hays RD, Lee ML, Siu AL. Does dissatisfaction with access to specialists affect the desire to leave a managed care plan? Med Care Res Rev. 1998;55:59–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Smith RC, Lyles JS, Mettler J, et al. The effectiveness of intensive training for residents in interviewing. A randomized, controlled study. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:118–26.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nancy L. Keating MD, MPH.

Additional information

This work was funded in part by the Prudential Center for Health Care Research, Atlanta, Ga. The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect those of the funder. Dr. Keating was a recipient of a Harvard-Prudential Fellowship for Health Services Reseach. During the conduct of this study, Dr. Cleary was a consultant to the Prudential Center for Health Care Research. Since this study was conducted, Prudential HealthCare® has become a member company of Aetna U.S. Healthcare®, and the Prudential Center for Health Care Research now operates as the Emory Center on Health Outcomes and Quality (formerly the USQA Center for Health Care Research™).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keating, N.L., Green, D.C., Kao, A.C. et al. How are patients’ specific ambulatory care experiences related to trust, satisfaction, and considering changing physicians?. J GEN INTERN MED 17, 29–39 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10209.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10209.x

Key words

Navigation