Skip to main content
Log in

Problems in recruiting community-based physicians for health services research

  • Reviews
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To qualitatively determine factors that are associated with higher participation rates in community-based health services research requiring significant physician participation burden.

MEASUREMENTS: A review of the literature was undertaken using MEDLINE and the Social Science Research Index to identify health services research studies that recruited large community-based samples of individual physicians and in which the participation burden exceeded that of merely completing a survey. Two reviewers abstracted data on the recruitment methods, and first authors were contacted to supplement published information.

MAIN RESULTS: Sixteen studies were identified with participation rates from 2.5% to 91%. Almost all studies used physician recruiters to personally contact potential participants. Recruiters often knew some of the physicians to be recruited, and personal contact with these “known” physicians resulted in greater participation rates. Incentives were generally absent or modest, and at modest levels, did not appear to affect participation rates. Investigators were almost always affiliated with academic institutions, but were divided as to whether this helped or hindered recruitment. HMO-based and minority physicians were more difficult to recruit. Potential participants most often cited time pressures on staff and themselves as the study burden that caused them to decline.

CONCLUSIONS: Physician personal contact and friendship networks are powerful tools for recruitment. Participation rates might improve by including HMO and minority physicians in the recruitment process. Investigators should transfer as much of the study burden from participating physicians to project staff as possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaner EF, Haighton CA, McAvoy BR. ‘So much post, so busy with practice—so, no time!’: a telephone survey of general practitioners’ reasons for not participating in postal questionnaire surveys. Br J Gen Pract. 1998;48:1067–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Templeton L, Deehan A, Taylor C, Drummond C, Strang J. Surveying general practitioners: does a low response rate matter? Br J Gen Pract. 1997;47:91–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Levinson W, Dull VT, Roter DL, Chaumeton N, Frankel RM. Recruiting physicians for office-based research. Med Care. 1998;36:934–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Asch DA, Jedrziewski KM, Christakis NA. Response rates to mailed surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epi. 1997;50:1129–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Asch DA, Christakis NA, Ubel PA. Conducting physician mail surveys on a limited budget: a randomized trial comparing $2 bill versus $5 bill incentives. Med Care. 1998;36:95–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shoteck H, Fairweather WR. Physician response rates to mail and personal interview surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly. 1979;43:206–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Del Valle ML, Morgenstern H, Rogstad TL, Albright C, Vickrey BG. A randomized trial of the impact of certified mail on response rate to a physician survey. Evaluation Health Prof. 1997;20:389–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Maheux B, Legault C, Lambert J. Increasing response rates in physicians’ mail surveys: an experimental study. Amer J Public Health. 1989;79:638–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. McBride PE, Massoth KM, Underbakke G, Solberg LI, Beasley JW, Plane MB. Recruitment of private practices for primary care research: experience in preventive services clinical trial. J Fam Pract. 1996;43:389–95.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Waitzkin H, Britt T. Processing narratives of self-destructive behavior in routine medical encounters: health promotion, disease prevention, and the discourse of health care. Soc Sci Med. 1993;36:1121–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kosecoff J, Chassin MR, Fink A, et al. Obtaining clinical data on the appropriateness of medical care in community practice. JAMA. 1987;258:2538–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cockburn J, Campbell E, Gordon JJ, Sanson-Fisher RW. Response bias in a study of general practice. Fam Pract. 1988;5:18–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Borgiel AE, Dunn EV, Lamont CT, et al. Recruiting family physicians as participants in research. Fam Pract. 1989;6:168–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Carey TS, Garrett J, Jackman A, McLaughin C, Fryer J, Smucher DR. The outcomes and costs of care for acute low back pain among patients seen by primary care practitioners, chiropractors, and orthopedic surgeons. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:913–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hart LG, Dobie SA, Baldwin LM, Pirani MJ, Fordyce M, Rosenblatt RA. Rural and urban differences in physician resource use for low-risk obstetrics. Hlth Serv Res. 1996;31:429–52.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hutchinson B, Woodward CA, Norman GR, Abelson J, Brown JA. Provision of preventive care to unannounced standardized patients. CMAJ. 1998;158:185–93.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Baldwin LM, Raine T, Jenkins LD, Hart LG, Rosenblatt R. Do providers adhere to ACOG standards? The case of prenatal care. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;84:549–56.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Saver BG, Taylor TR, Treadwell JR, Cole WG. Do physicians do as they say? The case of mammography. Arch Fam Med. 1997;6:543–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kottke TE, Solberg LI, Conn S, et al. A comparison of two methods to recruit physicians to deliver smoking cessation interventions. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:1477–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mendenhall RC, Tarlov AR, Girard RA, Michel JK, Radecki SE. A national study of internal medicine and its specialties: II. Primary care in internal medicine. Ann Int Med. 1979;91:275–87.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stewart AL, Ware JE, eds. Measuring Functioning and Well-Being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Coleman T. Sampling for qualitative research using quantitative methods. 2. Characteristics of GPs who agree to videotaping of consultations. Fam Pract. 1996;13:531–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hirsch SH, Mayer-Oakes A, Schweitzer S, Atchison KA, Lubben JE, DeJong F. Enrolling community physicians and their patients in a study of prevention in the elderly. Public Health Rep. 1992;107:142–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dobie S, Hart LG, Fordyce M, Andrilla CHA, Rosenblatt RA. Obstetric care and payment source: do low-risk Medicaid women get less care? Amer J Public Health. 1998;88:51–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rosenblatt RA, Dobie SA, Hart LG, et al. Interspecialty differences in the obstetric care of low-risk women. Amer J Public Health. 1997;87:344–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Asch MD, MPH.

Additional information

This material was supported by National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Award No. 1 R01 CA65879 (SAF). Dr. Asch’s time is supported by a Career Development Award from the VA HSR&D service.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Asch, S., Connor, S.E., Hamilton, E.G. et al. Problems in recruiting community-based physicians for health services research. J GEN INTERN MED 15, 591–599 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.02329.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.02329.x

Key words

Navigation