Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Undertreatment of hyperlipidemia in the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine adherence to national guidelines for the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease (CAD) using lipid-lowering drugs (LLDs), by studying the rate of use of LLDs, predictors of use, and the rate of achieving lipid goals, among eligible patients recently hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of 2,938 medical records, collected from July 1995 to May 1996.

SETTING: Thirty-seven community-based hospitals in Minnesota.

PATIENTS: The 622 patients had previously established CAD and hyperlipidemia (total cholesterol >200 mg/dL or currently using LLDs), and were eligible for LLDs according to the National Cholesterol Education Program II (NCEP II) Guidelines.

MEASUREMENTS: The use of LLDs in eligible patients (primary outcome) and successful achievement of NCEP II goals (total cholesterol <160 mg/dL) among treated patients (secondary outcome).

MAIN RESULTS: Only 230 (37%) of 622 eligible patients received LLDs. In multivariate logistic regression, factors independently related to LLD use included age greater than 74 years (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35, 0.88) and severe comorbidity (AOR 0.60; 95% CI 0.38, 0.95), managed care enrollee (AOR 1.56; 95% CI 1.02, 2.39), past smoker (AOR 1.72; 95% CI 0.98, 3.01), prior revascularization (AOR 2.31; 95% CI 1.51, 3.53), and the use of aspirin (AOR 1.59; 95% CI 1.07, 2.38) or ≥4 medications (AOR 2.89; 95% CI 2.19, 3.84). Of the treated patients who had lipid levels measured (n=149), 15% achieved the recommended goal of a total cholesterol below 160 mg/dL. Of the untreated patients (n=392), 89% were discharged from hospital without a LLD prescription.

CONCLUSIONS: Lipid-lowering drugs, although proven effective for the secondary prevention of CAD, were used by only one third of eligible patients. Among patients receiving LLDs, few achieved recommended lipid goals. Directed quality improvement interventions, such as starting LLDs during hospitalization, may have the potential to substantially reduce CAD morbidity and mortality in this vulnerable population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Soumerai SB. Factors influencing prescribing. Aust J Hosp Pharm. 1988;18(3):9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lamas GA, Pfeffer MA, Hamm P, et al. Do the results of randomized trials of cardiovascular drugs influence medical practice? N Engl J Med. 1992;327:241–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. La Rosa JC, Hunninghake D, Bush D, et al. The cholesterol facts—a summary of the evidence relating dietary fats, serum cholesterol, and coronary heart disease. Circulation. 1990;81:1721–33.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gaziano JM, Hebert PR, Hennekens CH. Cholesterol reduction: weighing the benefits and risks. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:914–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kjekshus J, Pedersen TR, Tobert JA. Lipid lowering therapy for patients with or at risk of coronary artery disease. Curr Opin Cardiol. 1996;11:418–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gotto AM Jr. Cholesterol management in theory and practice. Circulation. 1997;96:4424–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Davignon J, Montigny M, Dufour R. HMG CoA reductase inhibitors: a look back and a look ahead. Can J Cardiol. 1992;8:843–88.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. The Expert Panel. Summary of the second report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel II). JAMA. 1993;269:3015–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Randomized trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet. 1994;344:1383–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tsuyuki RT, Teo KK, Ikuta RM, Bay KS, Greenwood PV, Montague TJ. Mortality risk and patterns of practice in 2,070 patients with acute myocardial infarction, 1987–92. Chest. 1994;105:1687–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McLaughlin TJ, Soumerai SB, Willison DJ, et al. Adherence to national guidelines for drug treatment of suspected acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:799–805.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ayanian JZ, Epstein AM. Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:221–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McLaughlin TJ, Soumerai SB, Willison DJ, et al. The effect of comorbidity on use of thrombolysis or aspirin in acute myocardial infarction patients eligible for treatment. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:1–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Soumerai SB, McLaughlin TJ, Gurwitz JH, et al. Effect of local medical opinion leaders on quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1998;279:1358–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gore JM, Goldberg RJ, Matsumoto AS, Castelli WP, McNamara PM, Dalen JE. Validity of serum total cholesterol level obtained within 24 hours of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1984;54:722–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ryder REJ, Hayes TM, Mulligan IP, Kingswood JC, Williams S, Owens DR. How soon after myocardial infarction should plasma lipid values be assessed? BMJ. 1984;289:1651–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ahnve S, Angelin B, Edhag O, Berglund L. Early determination of serum lipids and apolipoproteins in acute myocardial infarction: possibility for immediate intervention. J Intern Med. 1989;226:297–301.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Greenfield S, Apolone G, McNeil BJ, Cleary PD. The importance of coexistent disease in the occurrence of postoperative complications and one-year recovery in patients undergoing total hip replacement: comorbidity and outcomes after hip replacement. Med Care. 1993;31:141–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. SAS Institute. SAS/STAT User’s Guide. Version 6. 4th ed. Vol. 2. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Efron B, Gong G. A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife, and cross-validation. Am Statistician. 1983;37:36–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Brown BG, Zhao X, Bardsley J, Albers JJ. Secondary prevention of heart disease amongst patients with lipid abnormalities: practice and trends in the United States. J Intern Med. 1997;241:283–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rembold CM. Number-needed-to-treat analysis of the prevention of myocardial infarction and death by antidyslipidemic therapy. J Fam Pract. 1996;42:577–86.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vogel RA. Risk factor intervention and coronary artery disease: clinical strategies. Coron Artery Dis. 1995;6:466–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. ASPIRE Steering Group. A British Cardiac Society survey of the potential for the secondary prevention of coronary disease: ASPIRE (Action on Secondary Prevention through Intervention to Reduce Events), principal results. Heart. 1996;75:334–42.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pearson TA, Peters TD, Feury D. Comprehensive risk reduction in coronary patients: attainment of goals of the AHA guidelines in U.S. patients. Circulation. 1997;96 (suppl):1–733.

    Google Scholar 

  26. McBride P, Schrott HG, Plane MB, Underbakke G, Brown RL. Primary care practice adherence to National Cholesterol Education Program Guidelines for patients with coronary heart disease. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1238–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Soumerai SB, McLaughlin TJ, Spiegelman D, Hertzmark E, Thibeault G, Goldman L. Adverse outcomes of underuse of beta-blockers in elderly survivors of acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1997;277:115–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Stafford RS, Blumenthal D, Pasternak RC. Variations in cholesterol management practices of U.S. physicians. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:139–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Debusk RF, Houston-Miller N, Superko R, et al. A case-management system for coronary risk factor modification after acute myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:721–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Schrott HG, Bittner V, Vittinghoff E, et al. Adherence to National Cholesterol Education Program treatment goals in postmenopausal women with heart disease. JAMA. 1997;277:1281–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Marcelino JJ, Feingold KR. Inadequate treatment with HMG CoA reductase inhibitors by health care providers. Am J Med. 1996;100:605–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Krumholz HM, Seeman TE, Merril SS, et al. Lack of association between cholesterol and coronary heart disease mortality and morbidity and all-cause mortality in persons older than 70 years. JAMA. 1994;272:1335–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hulley SB, Newman TB. Cholesterol in the elderly: is it important? JAMA. 1994;272:1372–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Corti MC, Guralnik JM, Salive ME, et al. Clarifying the direct relation between total cholesterol and death from coronary heart disease in older persons. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:753–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Marciniak TA, Ellerbeck EF, Radford MJ, et al. Improving the quality of care for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. JAMA. 1998;279:1351–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ouchi Y, Ohashi Y, Ito H, et al. Serum cholesterol lowering by pravastatin reduces cardiovascular events in the elderly with hypercholesterolemia: overall and age-related analyses of the results from the PATE study. Circulation. 1997;96 (suppl):1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pearson TA, McBride PE, Houston-Miller N, Smith SC Jr. Organization of preventive cardiology service. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:1035–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kottke TE, Blackburn H, Brekke ML, Solberg LI. Making time for preventive services. Mayo Clin Proc. 1993;68:785–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Smedire NG, Evans BH, Grais LS, et al. Withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:309–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hanson LC, Danis M. Use of life-sustaining care for the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39:772–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Fontana SA, Baumann LC, Helberg C, Love RR. The delivery of preventive services in primary care practices according to chronic disease status. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:1190–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Redelmeier DA, Tan SH, Booth GL. The treatment of unrelated disorders in patients with chronic medical diseases. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1516–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Berwick DM. Payment by capitation and the quality of care. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1227–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Emanuel EJ, Dubler NN. Preserving the physician-patient relationship in the era of managed care. JAMA. 1995;273:323–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Avorn J, Monette J, Lacour A, et al. Persistence of use of lipid-lowering medications. JAMA. 1998;279:1458–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Andrade SE, Walker AM, Gottlieb LK, et al. Discontinuation of antihyperlipidemic drugs—do rates reported in clinical trials reflect rates in primary care settings? N Engl J Med. 1995;332:1125–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Sacks FM, Pfeffer MA, Moye LA, et al. The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1001–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. LIPID Study Group. Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1349–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kannel WB. Preventive efficacy of nutritional counseling. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1138–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Hunninghake DB, Stein EA, Dujovne CA, et al. The efficacy of intensive dietary therapy alone or combined with lovastatin in outpatients with hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1213–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by grants from the National Institute on Aging (AG14474), the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (HSO7357), the Healthcare Education and Research Foundation, and the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Foundation. Dr. Majumdar was the recipient of a National Research Service Award (PE 11001-10).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Majumdar, S.R., Gurwitz, J.H. & Soumerai, S.B. Undertreatment of hyperlipidemia in the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease. J GEN INTERN MED 14, 711–717 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.02229.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.02229.x

Key Words

Navigation