Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Communication
  • Published:

Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of nutrition guidance by primary care physicians

Abstract

Objective: To investigate in primary care physicians (PCPs) the determinants of a nutrition guidance practice (‘noticing patients’ overweight and guidance of treatment’), as well as their mechanism of action, in a cross-sectional and a longitudinal approach.

Design: Mixed longitudinal design. Five years follow up study of a previous cross-sectional study in October 1992.

Subjects: A representative sample of 675 Dutch PCPs, in practice for 5 up to 20 y.

Interventions: A shortened version of the Wageningen PCPs Nutritional Practices Questionnaire was mailed to the subjects in August 1997.

Main outcome measure: To obtain with the LISREL-program a model of the mechanism of action of determinants of the dependent variable ‘noticing patients’ overweight and guidance of treatment’ with an adequate fit of the empirical data, both in the cross-sectional and in the longitudinal approach.

Results: The same set of predisposing factors and intermediary factors explains the dependent variable both in two different representative cross-sectional study populations of PCPs, and in a cohort cross-sectional study at two points in time. Two dynamic LISREL-models were developed (the ‘determinant-longitudinal approach’ and the ‘early behaviour longitudinal approach’) which explain the dependent variable. The latter model has, as added value, a gain in explained variance. In 5 y time, the dependent variable decreased significantly (P<0.001).

Conclusions: This study reconfirms that PCPs’ nutritional guidance practices are determined partly directly by predisposing factors, and indirectly via driving forces and barriers. However this study also reveals that an important nutrition guidance practice of PCPs, ‘noticing patients’ overweight and guidance of treatment’, shows a significant decrease over the last 5 y. At the same time, two of the four predisposing factors and two of the three driving factors also decreased significantly. As research findings indicate that the role of diet in health and disease becomes of greater influence PCPs need to be activated to apply their responsibility in this field within a multi-faceted approach.

Sponsorship: The study was supported by the Dutch Dairy Foundation on Nutrition and Health, Maarssen, The Netherlands.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Contributors: GJ Hiddink, JGAJ Hautvast, CMJ van Woerkum, MA van’t Hof and CJ Fieren designed the study.

GJ Hiddink was the principal investigator. He reduced the Wageningen PCPs Nutritional Practices Questionnaire for use in this study and organized together with the Market research bureau GfK, Dongen, The Netherlands the data collection. MA van’t Hof and GJ Hiddink are responsible for statistical data-analysis.

GJ Hiddink wrote the first draft and the final version of the manuscript. JGAJ Hautvast, CMJ van Woerkum, MA van’t Hof and CJ Fieren contributed to the preparation of the manuscript and to the interpretation of the results. GJ Hiddink is the guarantor for the integrity of the article as a whole.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hiddink, G., Hautvast, J., van Woerkum, C. et al. Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of nutrition guidance by primary care physicians. Eur J Clin Nutr 53 (Suppl 2), s35–s43 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600800

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600800

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links