Educational/Counseling Model Health Care
Asking questions: The effect of a brief intervention in community health centers on patient activation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.026Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the impact of a patient activation intervention (PAI) focused on building question formulation skills that was delivered to patients in community health centers prior to their physician visit.

Methods

Level of patient activation and patient preferred role were examined using the patient activation measure (PAM) and the patient preference for control (PPC) measure.

Results

More of the 252 patients evaluated were at lower levels of activation (PAM levels 1 or 2) than U.S. population norms before the intervention. Paired-samples t-test revealed a statistically significant increase from pre-intervention to post-visit PAM scores. One-third of participants moved from lower levels of activation to higher levels (PAM levels 3 or 4) post-intervention. Patients preferring a more passive role had lower initial PAM scores and greater increases in their post-intervention PAM scores than did those who preferred a more active role.

Conclusion

Patients exposed to the PAI demonstrated significant improvement on a measure of activation. The PAI may be useful in helping patients prepare for more effective encounters with their physicians.

Practice implications

The PAI was feasible to deliver in the health center setting and may be a useful method for activating low-income, racial/ethnic minority patient populations.

Introduction

Effective physician–patient communication correlates with improved health outcomes [1] but this communication is less successful for minority and lower SES patient populations [2]. Physicians tend to communicate less collaboratively with patients from these populations [3] which may limit benefit from health improvement efforts, thus contributing to health disparities [4]. Underrepresented minority patients ask fewer questions in health care settings and may have difficulty understanding information presented to them [5], [6], [7], [8]. We constructed an intervention designed to improve and increase the questions patients ask. Our intention was to increase patients’ communication and participation in their health care.

Patient activation [9] is defined as the readiness and ability to take on the role of managing both health and health care [10]. Patient activation is therefore a precursor to success in self-management and health promotion, as well as to greater engagement in patients’ decision-making concerning their health. Lower socioeconomic status (SES) individuals have been shown to have lower levels of activation [11]. Hibbard et al. developed the patient activation measure (PAM) to assess knowledge, skills and confidence in managing health [12], [13]. Higher PAM scores are associated with more satisfactory interactions with providers, more engagement with the health care system, more information-seeking, better adherence to health promoting behaviors, and improved health outcomes [14], [15], [16]. Other investigators have described activation as an outcome in itself and suggest that it is alterable [17].

Documented differences in information-seeking behavior [18], [19] have led to efforts to get patients to ask more questions [20]. Patients who ask more questions are reported to obtain more relevant information from their providers, be more engaged in their care, and feel more empowered in their office visits [21], [22]. Although programs designed to provide patients with questions to ask during medical visits have been developed [23], [24], [25], questions that do not arise spontaneously from patients may not provide the questioner with the information of greatest import and may generate answers not tailored to the level of understanding or needs of the patient. Additionally providing questions to patients carries an implicit message that the questioner lacks the ability to determine the information they most need, which may diminish patient confidence and self-efficacy.

The Right Question Project (RQP) [26] designed an approach to train people in low- and moderate-income communities to advocate for themselves by asking questions that allow for more successful participation in decisions that affect the services they receive. Building on these principles that empower patients not used to advocating for themselves [4], this project developed and implemented a patient activation intervention (PAI) to build patient's skills to ask more and better questions of their doctors and to recognize the importance of asking questions in the decision-making process.

We evaluated the intervention's impact on PAM scores, and explored the influence of individuals’ preferred role in decision-making.

Section snippets

Sites and participants

After approval by the City College of New York Institutional Review Board, project staff approached patients waiting to see their clinicians at one of the five community health centers in New York City. Consenting patients received pre-intervention surveys that captured standard socio-demographic information, health status, and presence or absence of chronic conditions, together with the PAM and the PPC. The surveys, intervention and interviews were delivered in Spanish or English based on

Patient characteristics and levels of activation

Interviewers approached 651 patients of whom 276 (42.4%) agreed to participate; data from 24 individuals were not included in the analysis due to incomplete items (n = 252). Table 1 shows the demographic characteristics of the participants. Participants had a mean age of 39 years (SD = 16.04) and were predominately Latino or African American (90.1%). Half of the participants reported a medical condition for which they saw their doctor on a regular basis.

Results of one-way analysis of variance

Discussion

In this convenient sample the PAI was associated with a significant increase in participants’ PAM scores, regardless of pre-existing attitudes towards the stated “role” they wished to assume in their interactions with physicians. Health centers deal with disenfranchised communities evidenced by the pre-intervention scores on the PAM being lower than the reported national averages [12]. This is consistent with findings from a previous health center-based study [30].

These results suggest that the

Declaration

I confirm all patient/personal identifiers have been removed or disguised so the patient/person(s) described are not identifiable and cannot be identified through the details of the story.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the efforts of medical students Karen Wat, OpeyemiOladele, Jennifer Walia, Francesse Antoine, Angie Hernandez, and Cristine Espinosa who served as research assistants in this research study. We thank also the Morris Heights Health Center, the William F. Ryan Community Health Center, Montefiore Medical Group's Castle Hill Family Practice, Bedford Stuyvesant Family Health Center, and Urban Health Plan and their patients for their generous willingness to participate in this

References (30)

  • J.H. Hibbard et al.

    Improving the outcomes of disease management by tailoring care to the patient's level of activation

    Am J Manag Care

    (2009)
  • J.H. Hibbard et al.

    How engaged are consumers in their health and health care, and why does it matter?

    Res Briefs

    (2008)
  • J.H. Hibbard et al.

    Racial/ethnic disparities and consumer activation in health

    Health Affairs

    (2008)
  • J. Hibbard et al.

    Development of the patient activation measure (PAM): conceputalizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers

    Health Serv Res

    (2004)
  • J.H. Hibbard et al.

    Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure

    Health Res Educ Trust

    (2005)
  • Cited by (124)

    • Preoperative patient activation predicts minimum clinically important difference for PROMIS pain and physical function in patients undergoing elective spine surgery

      2023, Spine Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Skolasky et al. [28], in a prospective analysis of 122 patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery, found that brief motivational interviewing before surgery was associated with improved patient activation and greater adherence to physical therapy after surgery. Deen et al. [25] administered a patient activation intervention among 252 patients presenting for physician visits resulting in one third of those patients moving from lower stages of activation (stage 1 & 2) to higher stages of activation (stage 3&4). Frosch et al. [29] developed a video intervention aimed at improving ability of seniors to self-manage health care needs, targeted towards those with chronic medical conditions, resulting in increased patient activation at 6-month follow-up.

    • Shared decision-making among non-physician healthcare professionals: Enhancing patient involvement in women's reproductive health in community healthcare settings

      2021, Patient Education and Counseling
      Citation Excerpt :

      Studies assessing SDM-use found physicians often scored low on SDM behaviors [28,28,29]and experienced reduced patient engagement [30], indicating further training is needed to effectively execute SDM [25,27]. While much is known about physicians’ SDM experiences, little is known about SDM proficiency among non-physicians [13,15,31–36]. Encouraging SDM among non-physician HCPs may facilitate increased SDM uptake, fostering consistent, quality care experiences for women across HCPs and settings [37,38].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text