Original article
The association of physician-specialty density and melanoma prognosis in the United States, 1988 to 1993

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2008.08.040Get rights and content

Background

Studies suggest physician workforce may influence cancer outcomes.

Objective

We sought to quantify the effect of physician-specialty density on melanoma prognosis.

Methods

Data from 17,702 melanoma cases reported to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program from 1988 to 1993 were merged with sociodemographic data (1990 US Census) and dermatologist, family practitioner, and internist density data (Area Resource File). Linear and logistic regression analyses were used to model prognosis (melanoma mortality to incidence ratio).

Results

A higher density of dermatologists was associated with better prognosis (lower mortality to incidence ratio) (β = –50 × 10−4; SE 8 × 10−4). Internist density was also a significant predictor of better prognosis whereas increased family practitioner density was associated with worse prognosis. Controlling for sociodemographics, physician density remained a significant predictor of the mortality to incidence ratio.

Limitations

Socioeconomic factors were estimated. Physician density was examined by county.

Conclusion

Controlling for sociodemographic factors, physician-specialty density predicted melanoma prognosis. This suggests that specialist health care availability may affect melanoma outcomes.

Section snippets

Methods

This was a population-based ecologic analysis of a cohort of patients in the melanoma cancer registry using data from the SEER-9 program, which was linked to the US Census data (socioeconomic estimates) and Area Resource File (ARF) (physician provider data). Sponsored by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the SEER program provides the broadest system of cancer registration in the United States, and represents approximately 10% of the US population in the original 9 population-based cancer

Results

The density of providers in SEER counties was examined for dermatologists, family practitioners (FPs), and internists. The median density of dermatologists was 3.4 dermatologists per 100,000 population (range: 0-27 dermatologists/100,000 population). The median density of FPs was 13.9 FPs per 100,000 population (range: 0-87 FPs/100,000 population) and the median density of internists was 33.7 (range: 0-161 internists/100,000 population). The density of dermatologists was highly correlated with

Discussion

This study, which examines multiple operational definitions of prognosis that are relevant to melanoma, illuminates the potential role of access to health care in melanoma outcomes, an area in which there has been limited study. In this study, we examined the provider density and specialty type, factors that may reflect potential access to care. Findings from this study suggest that access to specialty care may explain some differences in melanoma prognosis. Alternatively, unmeasured factors

References (23)

  • RG. Roetzheim et al.

    Increasing supplies of dermatologists and family physicians are associated with earlier stage of melanoma detection

    J Am Acad Dermatol

    (2000)
  • J.S. Resneck et al.

    Short wait times for patients seeking cosmetic botulinum toxin appointments with dermatologists

    J Am Acad Dermatol

    (2007)
  • A. Jemal et al.

    Cancer statistics, 2006

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2006)
  • Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary CL, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Clegg L, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2001....
  • A. Jemal et al.

    Cancer statistics, 2007

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2007)
  • A. Jemal et al.

    Cancer statistics, 2003

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2003)
  • A.C. Geller et al.

    Cutaneous melanoma mortality among the socioeconomically disadvantaged in Massachusetts

    Am J Public Health

    (1996)
  • R.M. MacKie et al.

    Incidence and thickness of primary tumors and survival of patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma in relation to socioeconomic status

    BMJ

    (1996)
  • C.A. Reyes-Ortiz et al.

    Socioeconomic status and survival in older patients with melanoma

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (2006)
  • Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary CL, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Clegg L, Edwards BK. SEER cancer statistics review, 1973-1999....
  • R.D. Cress et al.

    Incidence of cutaneous melanoma among non-Hispanic whites, Hispanics, Asians, and blacks: an analysis of California cancer registry data, 1988-93

    Cancer Causes Control

    (1997)
  • Cited by (39)

    • Utilization, cost, and provider trends in patch testing among Medicare beneficiaries in the United States from 2012 to 2017

      2021, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Our data show that nearly 99% of nonmetro counties in the US do not have a provider offering patch testing for the Medicare population. Indeed, although overall physician density has been associated with a variety of clinical outcomes in dermatology and other medical specialties, the greatest improvement in outcomes occurs in counties having any physician offering the relevant services versus those that have no such physicians.8-11,22-24 In these counties, barriers such as travel to a different county or physicians in the county being less likely to recommend patch testing because of decreased familiarity with the procedure likely preclude patients who may benefit from patch testing from receiving it.22,25-28

    • The role of spatially-derived access-to-care characteristics in melanoma prevention and control in Los Angeles county

      2017, Health and Place
      Citation Excerpt :

      Because a greater percentage of HW (9%) than NHW (1%) used Medicaid to pay for diagnostic services, the service shortage for Medicaid enrollees may disproportionately affect HW and may result in increased rates of thick melanoma among this population, especially as people gain coverage but struggle to find providers or have difficulty accessing those designated to them. Consistent with previous studies, our study showed that a greater supply of dermatologists decreased the risk of advanced melanoma (Aneja et al., 2012; Eide et al., 2009a; Roetzheim et al., 2000). Moreover, risk reductions were only significant, albeit marginally, among NHW and in low-poverty areas, suggesting that an increase in the number of neighborhood dermatologists may not necessarily improve access to dermatological care and may not successfully impact melanoma mortality among HW and high-poverty areas.

    • Variation in dermatologist visits by sociodemographic characteristics

      2017, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by a Dermatology Foundation award and a Surdna Foundation award (Dr Eide); grants CSP 402 from the Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Research and Development, and CA 106592 from the National Cancer Institute (Dr Weinstock); and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Institutional Training grant, HS00011-16 (Drs Clark and Eide).

    Conflicts of interest: None declared.

    View full text