Elsevier

General Hospital Psychiatry

Volume 36, Issue 3, May–June 2014, Pages 310-317
General Hospital Psychiatry

Psychiatry and Primary Care
Primary care clinician responses to positive suicidal ideation risk assessments in veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.11.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To examine primary care clinician actions following positive suicide risk assessments administered to Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) veterans.

Methods

We identified OEF/OIF veterans with positive templated suicide risk assessments administered in primary care settings of three Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Centers. National VA datasets and manual record review were used to identify and code clinician discussions and actions following positive assessments. Bivariate analyses were used to examine relationships between patient characteristics and discussions of firearms access and alcohol/drug use.

Results

Primary care clinicians documented awareness of suicide risk assessment results for 157 of 199 (79%) patients with positive assessments. Most patients were assessed for mental health conditions and referred for mental health follow-up. Clinicians documented discussions about firearms access for only 15% of patients. Among patients whose clinicians assessed for substance abuse, 34% received recommendations to reduce alcohol or drug use. Depression diagnoses and suicidal ideation/behavior severity were significantly associated with firearms access discussions, while patient sex, military service branch, and substance abuse diagnoses were significantly associated with recommendations to reduce substance use.

Conclusion

Greater efforts are needed to understand barriers to clinicians' assessing, documenting and counseling once suicidal ideation is detected, and to develop training programs and systems changes to address these barriers.

Introduction

Veterans utilizing Veterans Health Administration (VHA) services die by suicide at a higher rate than the general population [1], and while specific rates of suicide among veterans of Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) are unknown, OEF/OIF veterans have high rates of previously documented risk factors for suicide including depression, substance use disorder (SUD), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), chronic pain and traumatic brain injury [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. Furthermore, the rate of suicide among active duty OEF/OIF soldiers has increased in recent years, a trend which could follow this group into postdeployment [9].

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has implemented a multimodal strategy to improve detection and response to suicide risk [10]. As one part of this strategy, the VA designated assessment for possible suicidal ideation (SI) among veterans at higher risk for suicide as a national performance goal. Specifically, since 2007, brief templated, structured suicide risk assessment tools are administered across the VA as part of routine care following positive depression and PTSD screens. These tools, typically consisting of less than five items, are designed to be used in conjunction with clinical judgment to assess suicide risk. Depression and PTSD screening, and the use of templated suicide risk assessments to assess for SI, frequently occur in primary care settings [11].

Prior research indicates that up to half of individuals have contact with primary care clinicians in the month prior to suicide, while a smaller proportion has contact with mental health care clinicians during that month [12], [13]. As such, primary care clinicians may play a critical role in addressing suicide risk of veterans by detecting and treating important mental and general medical conditions, and being prepared to identify and intervene when veterans are at high risk. However, despite these high contact rates, there are substantial gaps in our knowledge of how primary care clinicians address suicide risk. A recent study by Smith et al. [14] showed that a minority (34%) of VA patients with a history of depression had a mental health diagnosis coded during final nonmental health visits within 30 days prior to suicide, and only 41% were receiving recommended dosages of antidepressants. Vannoy et al. [15], [16] found that while primary care clinicians may use language and communication approaches that support patient disclosures of SI, primary care clinicians are frequently challenged to go beyond assessment to develop well-defined and structured treatment plans when they encounter SI. Aside from this small group of studies, little is known about the specific actions primary care clinicians take when they encounter SI in their patients.

Two risk factors of particular importance for clinicians to address with veterans who disclose SI are firearms access and alcohol and drug use. Nearly three quarters of veteran suicides in Oregon between 2000 and 2005 were firearms deaths [13]. Other studies suggest that veterans are significantly more likely to use firearms as a means for suicide than nonveterans [17]. National survey data have shown that individuals with an SUD have a sixfold greater likelihood of a lifetime suicide attempt than those without SUDs [18]. Among veteran suicide decedents in Oregon who received care in the VA healthcare system during the year prior to death, 20% were given an SUD diagnosis during that year, the second most common mental health disorder diagnosed after mood disorders [13], [19]. In addition, it is well-documented that intoxication frequently precedes suicide attempts and death by suicide [20], [21], especially among those who die by gunshot wound [21].

The main objective of the current study was to describe primary care clinician discussions and clinical actions following depression screening and positive suicide risk assessments (indicating SI) administered to OEF/OIF veterans. A secondary objective was to identify correlates of documented clinician–patient discussions and actions related to two key suicide risk factors: discussions of firearms access and counseling to reduce alcohol or drug use.

Section snippets

Methods

This study was approved by the institutional review boards of the participating medical centers. Methods for the overall research project have been described in prior publications [11], [22].

Results

Across the three study sites, 1017 veterans had positive depression screens administered in primary care over the study period. Seven hundred twenty-two (71%) were subsequently administered suicide risk assessments in primary care; 97% of these were conducted within 1 day of depression screens. Among these 722 veterans, 199 (28%) had positive suicide risk assessments. For 157 (79%) of the patients with positive assessments, either their primary care clinicians conducted the assessment

Discussion

This is the first study to examine primary care clinician actions taken in response to routinely administered brief, templated assessments for SI. There were a number of encouraging findings. Primary care clinicians usually documented awareness of positive suicide risk assessment results and almost always assessed for mental health conditions, including SUDs. Mental health referrals or acknowledgement of upcoming appointments were almost universal. Clinicians usually discussed some psychosocial

Conclusion

Our results suggest that barriers remain to clinicians querying and counseling veterans at risk for suicide, including discussion of firearms access and psychosocial stressors relevant to suicide risk. Women with SI may be less likely to receive counseling to reduce use of alcohol and drugs. Our findings call upon investigators and other stakeholders to further study clinician, patient and system barriers to exploring and documenting key risk factors for patients at risk for suicide and to

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge Kathryn Dickinson, MPH; Megan Crutchfield, MPH; Anna Beane, BA; Joseph Warren, MA; and April Wilson, MPH, for assistance with reviewing medical records and coding and organizing data. The research reported here was supported by the Department of VA, VHA, Health Services Research and Development Service projects DHI-08-096 and IIR 10–331. Dr. Dobscha is Director of the Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care at the Portland VAMC. The views expressed in this

References (47)

  • Martin, J., Ghahramanlou-Holloway, M., Lou, K., Tucciarone, P. A comparative review of U.S. Military and civilian...
  • E.M. Haney et al.

    Suicide risk factors and risk assessment tools

    (2012)
  • M.S. Kaplan et al.

    Suicide risk and precipitating circumstances among young, middle-aged, and older male veterans

    Am J Public Health

    (2012)
  • A. Kline et al.

    Suicidal ideation among National Guard troops deployed to Iraq: the association with postdeployment readjustment problems

    J Nerv Ment Dis

    (2011)
  • Department of the Army

    Army health promotion risk reduction suicide prevention report 2010

  • Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General

    Healthcare Inspection: Implementing VHA’s Mental Health Strategic Plan Initiatives for Suicide Prevention. Report # 06–03706–126

  • J.B. Luoma et al.

    Contact with mental health and primary care providers before suicide: a review of the evidence

    Am J Psychiatry

    (2002)
  • C. Basham et al.

    Characteristics and VA health care utilization of U.S. Veterans who completed suicide in Oregon between 2000 and 2005

    Suicide Life Threat Behav

    (2011)
  • E.G. Smith et al.

    Treatment of Veterans with depression who died by suicide: timing and quality of care at last Veterans Health Administration visit

    J Clin Psychiatry

    (2011)
  • S.D. Vannoy et al.

    Now what should I do? Primary care physicians' responses to older adults expressing thoughts of suicide

    J Gen Intern Med

    (2011)
  • S.D. Vannoy et al.

    Suicide inquiry in primary care: creating context, inquiring, and following up

    Ann Fam Med

    (2010)
  • M.S. Kaplan et al.

    Suicide among male veterans: a prospective population-based study

    J Epidemiol Community Health

    (2007)
  • R.C. Kessler et al.

    Prevalence of and risk factors for lifetime suicide attempts in the National Comorbidity Survey

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (1999)
  • Cited by (19)

    • Firearms storage safety discussions in VA primary care: Staff perspectives

      2021, General Hospital Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Safe firearms storage practices have been associated with reduced risk of death by suicide [6–8], and promotion of such practices within Veterans Health Affairs [VHA]) is a high VHA priority [9] and is recommended in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and Department of Defense Suicide Prevention guidelines. Based on evaluations of clinician self-report and of documentation in the medical record, firearms storage safety (FSS) discussions, which encourage limiting access to firearms during periods of elevated risk, are rarely conducted in non-mental health settings [10–13]. Despite growing recognition that primary care teams can play an important role in suicide prevention [14,15], primary care clinicians may be uncomfortable discussing firearms with patients due to limited knowledge or personal experience with firearms, beliefs that suicide is not preventable, concerns about negative impacts to the therapeutic relationship, or beliefs that counseling about firearms would not make a difference [10,16].

    • Treatment of veterans with mental health symptoms in VA primary care prior to suicide

      2016, General Hospital Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Selim is the sum of 30 physical and six psychological ICD-9-CM diagnoses in the prior year, here modified as the sum of these diagnoses plus hyperlipidemia [24]. Using an approach similar to prior studies [12,25], we used a systematic, iterative process to develop a data collection tool to record content of care, including assessment and follow-up for MH conditions and SI, documented in each patient's medical record for the year after the index date (Table 1). In consultation with the investigators, experienced medical record reviewers pilot tested and revised the data collection tool over several iterations until investigators and reviewers agreed on content and coding, and interrater reliability was excellent (i.e., Kappa≥0.75) [26].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text