Influences of Attitudes on Family Physicians' Willingness to Prescribe Long-Acting Opioid Analgesics for Patients with Chronic Nonmalignant Pain

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.12.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Background: The treatment of moderate to severe chronic nonmalignant pain (CNMP) is a challenge for both the patient and health care provider. Conflicting information exists regarding the appropriate use of long-acting (ie, controlled-release [CR]) opioid analgesics for CNMP, and physicians may be reluctant to prescribe them even when medically appropriate.

Objective: This study examined physicians' willingness and attitudes toward prescribing long-acting opioids to patients with moderate to severe CNMR

Methods: As part of a larger survey sent to 2750 family physicians, one question was used to assess physicians' willingness to prescribe, and 20 Likert-type questions were used to measure physicians' attitudes toward prescribing CR opioids.

Results: Of the 267 usable responses (10% responserate), two thirds of physicians indicated that they were “somewhat willing” to “extremely willing” to prescribe long-acting opioids to their patients with CNMR Physicians indicated an overall slightly favorable attitude (mean [SD], +2.96 [17.75] [possible range, −90 to +90]) toward prescribing long-acting opioids for CNME Physicians who were unwilling to prescribe had an overall unfavorable attitude (mean [SD], −7.87 [17.43]) compared with willing physicians (mean [SD], +9.56 [14.81]). Approximately 80% of physicians believed that long-acting opioids would be effective in controlling pain and would improve overall quality of life in patients with CNMR However, 78 % indicated that they were “somewhat likely” to “extremely likely” to encounter regulatory scrutiny if they prescribed long-acting opioids for CNMP, and about half (51%) of the respondents believed prescribing them would lead to patient addiction. Unwilling physicians held stronger beliefs that prescribing opioids would lead to patient abuse, addiction, and regulatory scrutiny compared with willing physicians.

Conclusions: About two thirds of physician respondents were willing to prescribe long-acting opioids for patients with CNMP, and physician attitudes were marginally favorable. Further study should investigate how physicians' attitudes and willingness translate into actual prescribing behavior.

References (51)

  • T Baumann

    Pain management

  • RK Portenoy

    Current pharmacotherapy of chronic pain

    J Pain Symptom Manage

    (2000)
  • Pain Report 7 focus on long-acting...
  • BD Dickinson et al.

    Use of opioids to treat chronic, noncancer pain

    West J Med

    (2000)
  • Pain: Current understanding of assessment, management, and treatments [monograph]

    Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations

    (December 2001)
  • The American Pain Society (APS). Definitions related to the use of opioids for the treatment of pain [APS Website],...
  • Model policy for the use of controlled substances for thetreatment of pain

    FSMB FoSMB

    (2003)
  • J Gardner-Nix

    Principles ofopioid use in chronic noncancer pain

    CMAJ

    (2003)
  • Veterans Health Administration DoD

    VA/DoD clinical practice guideline for the management of opioid therapy for chronic pain

    (March 2003)
  • Guidelines for the assessment and management of chronic pain

    Wisc Med J

    (2004)
  • World Health Organization

    Cancer, pain relief and palliative care

    (1990)
  • DL Gourlay et al.

    Exploring the misconceptions: Opioids in pain management

    (September 2004)
  • Clark M. Pain management: The benefits and risks of opioids [The Johns Hopkins Arthritis Center Web site]....
  • M Potter et al.

    Opioids for chronic nonmalignant pain. Attitudes and practices of primary care physicians in the UCSF/Stanford Collaborative Research Network

    J Fam Pract

    (2001)
  • M Glajchen

    Chronic pain: Treatment barriers and strategies for clinical practice

    J Am Board Faro Pract

    (2001)
  • Cited by (82)

    • Communication between pharmacists and primary care physicians in the midst of a U.S. opioid crisis

      2019, Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
      Citation Excerpt :

      The pharmacist interview guide was informed by 1) Paudyal's22 review of factors associated with decision-making for pharmacists, e.g., attributes of medicines, pharmacist experience, organizational factors, and communication; and 2) the small literature on pharmacists' experiences and perspectives on opioid dispensing23–25 which highlighted issues/concerns such as misuse/overdose, diversion, and “doctor-shopping.” The PCP interview guide was informed by: 1) Zafar et al.'s26 and Grimshaw et al.'s27 models of decision-making/physician behavior, both of which highlighted the importance of patient characteristics, physician knowledge and characteristics, external evidence, and societal/practice norms; and 2) the wider literature on opioid prescribing28–51 which highlighted issues such as coercion, manipulation, early refills, and dealing with risk and uncertainty. In addition to questions directly related to these a priori themes, the interview guides also included numerous open-ended questions designed to elicit new themes.

    • Physicians’ intention to prescribe hydrocodone combination products after rescheduling: A theory of reasoned action approach

      2017, Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
      Citation Excerpt :

      This was a cross-sectional study; therefore any changes to physicians' intention cannot be determined and causality should not be inferred. As with other online surveys of physicians, the response rate was relatively low; however, the total number of respondents is much higher than many other physician surveys in the literature.25,34,44 Study findings may also not be generalizable beyond Texas, as all respondents were members of the TMA, and laws pertaining to schedule II prescribing differ across different states.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text