Quantitative, qualitative, and anecdotal evidence, predominantly since 1980 and relevant to less developed countries, was gathered from key informant interviews and hand and web-based literature searches. Web-based academic search engines used were: Bids, Ingenta, ISI Web of Science, Medline/PubMed, and BIDS-Psychinfo. Initial search terms included: “malaria”, “tuberculosis”, “HIV/AIDS”, and “vulnerability”, “malnutrition”, “poverty”, “gender”, “risk or risk factor”, “susceptibility”,
ReviewVulnerability to malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV/AIDS infection and disease. Part 1: determinants operating at individual and household level
Section snippets
Current response to the global burden of malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV disease
In 2001, malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV infection together claimed 5·7 million lives.1 The effect of these diseases, and the inadequate national and international responses, is a major reason why the poor stay poor. Increasing recognition of the link between the burden of these diseases and a lack of economic growth has galvanised global institutions to renew efforts aimed at reducing the impact of these diseases through both health and non-health approaches.2 WHO and the Commission of the
What is “vulnerability”?
Vulnerability is a complex and contested concept, with a variety of definitions arising from different disciplines (panel 2).3, 4, 5, 6 Although vulnerability analyses have been carried out in relation to various settings (eg, disasters, poverty, urban macroeconomic decline, specific health problems such as HIV/AIDS and mental health) some common features emerge (panel 3).7 Vulnerability encompasses the factors that lead to variation in the impact of disease between different communities and
Approaches to vulnerability in infectious diseases
Most discussion on vulnerability in infectious disease has been in the context of the HIV epidemic. Initial approaches to dealing with the HIV/AIDS epidemic focused on “high-risk” groups, such as sex workers, long-distance truck drivers, and soldiers, whose behaviour was constructed as “risky”. This approach places responsibility for change on individuals; it has been criticised because it ignores the social and economic factors that constrain the ability of an individual to change.9, 10, 11, 12
Epidemiology and transmission of malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV infections
Malaria causes more than a million deaths each year worldwide. 90% of the deaths are in sub-Saharan Africa, predominantly in children under 5 years old.1 Malaria is a major cause of poverty and slows economic growth by up to 1·3% per year in endemic countries.17 42 million people are currently estimated to be living with HIV/AIDS. 95% of them are in less developed countries, particularly sub-Saharan Africa.18 In 2002 alone, 5 million people were thought to have become infected with HIV (2
Age
The degree of malaria immunity acquired by individuals living in endemic areas depends on the amount of exposure to infections and genetically determined immunological responses.20 In areas of high stable transmission of malaria, the incidence of clinical malaria peaks between 1 and 5 years of age, then declines rapidly as effective immune responses develop.17, 21 In these areas, 25% of all-cause mortality in children aged 0–4 years has been attributed to malaria.22 Where malaria transmission
Malaria and HIV/AIDS
Despite initial studies suggesting no association between malaria and HIV infection, there is emerging evidence of an important relation, particularly in pregnant women. HIV infection may interfere with pregnancy-specific immunity acquired during first and second pregnancies and increases the chance of parasitaemia and placental malaria.61, 62 The efficacy of intermittent two-dose sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine treatment is decreased in HIV-infected pregnant women, and they may require more frequent
Poverty
Poverty and disease are commonly linked in a downward spiral. Poverty increases vulnerability to malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV infection, and the ill-health and treatment costs associated with the diseases themselves lead to further impoverishment. Although poverty is a complex experience involving a lack of key capital assets (natural, financial, physical, human, and social), it is commonly viewed simplistically in economic terms with low income as a proxy indicator.83, 84 Ideally,
Search strategy and selection criteria
References (174)
- et al.
Feminism meets the “new” epidemiologies: toward an appraisal of antifeminist biases in epidemiological research on women's health
Soc Sci Med
(2001) - et al.
Tuberculosis
Lancet
(2003) - et al.
Combating malaria morbidity and mortality by reducing transmission
Parasitol Today
(1996) - et al.
“I think condoms are good but, aai, I hate those things”: condom use among adolescents and young people in a Southern African township
Soc Sci Med
(2001) Gender differentials in tuberculosis: the role of socio-economic and cultural factors
Tuber Lung Dis
(1996)- et al.
Difference in symptoms suggesting pulmonary tuberculosis among men and women
J Clin Epidemiol
(2002) - et al.
HIV-1/AIDS and maternal and child health in Africa
Lancet
(2002) - et al.
Protective effects of the sickle cell gene against malaria morbidity and mortality
Lancet
(2002) - et al.
Effect of HIV-1 antiretroviral drugs on cytoadherence and phagocytic clearance of Plasmodium falciparum-parasitised erythrocytes
Lancet
(2003) - et al.
Effect of HIV-1 and increasing immunosuppression on malaria parasitaemia and clinical episodes in adults in rural Uganda: a cohort study
Lancet
(2000)