11 The effect of pregnancy termination on future reproduction

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3552(05)80234-2Get rights and content

Summary

A variety of conditions have been anecdotally ascribed to induced abortion, including subsequent reproductive complications. Since most women obtaining induced abortions are at the beginning of their reproductive life, the effect of induced abortion on subsequent reproduction becomes a very significant one. Our review of the literature confirms findings reported previously. First, except in the case where an infection complicates induced abortion, there is no evidence of an association between induced abortion and secondary infetility or ectopic pregnancy. Second, the risk of mid-trimester abortion, premature delivery and low birthweight in women whose first pregnancy is terminated by vacuum aspiration is not higher than that in women in their first pregnancy or women in their second pregnancy whose first pregnancy was carried to term. However, the risk of having a premature delivery or a low birthweight baby tends to be higher (but not significantly) among women whose first pregnancy is terminated by induced abortion when compared with women in their second pregnancy than when compared with women in their first pregnancy. This suggests that an induced abortion does not protect a woman against the known risk of low birthweight for first-born offspring. Finally, women whose pregnancy is terminated by dilatation and evacuation may have an increased risk of subsequent premature delivery and a low birthweight baby. Very little has been published and no conclusions can be made regarding the effects of instillation procedures and repeat abortions on future reproduction. In conclusion, except for the association between pregnancies following dilatation and evacuation procedures and premature delivery and low birthweight, no significantly increased risk of adverse reproductive health has been observed following induced abortion.

References (53)

  • BrackenMB et al.

    Risk of late first and second trimester miscarriage after induced abortion

    American Journal of Perinatology

    (1986)
  • CatesW

    Late effects of induced abortion: hypothesis or knowledge?

    Journal of Reproductive Medicine

    (1979)
  • Centers for Disease Control

    Abortion surveillance: preliminary analysis—United States, 1986 and 1987

    Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report

    (1989)
  • ChungCS et al.

    Effects of Induced Abortion on Subsequent Reproductive Function and Pregnancy Outcome

    Final report, Contract number (N01-HD-62801). Honolulu: University of Hawai

    (1981)
  • ChungCS et al.

    Induced abortion and fetal loss in subsequent pregnancies

    American Journal of Public Health

    (1982)
  • ChungCS et al.

    Induced abortion and ectopic pregnancy in subsequent pregnancies

    American Journal of Epidemiology

    (1982)
  • CramerDW et al.

    Tubal infertility and the intrauterine device

    New England Journal of Medicine

    (1985)
  • DalingJR

    Subsequent pregnancy outcome following induced abortion

    PhD dissertation, Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington

    (1977)
  • DalingJR et al.

    Role of induced abortion in secondary infertility

    Obstetrics and Gynecology

    (1981)
  • DalingJR et al.

    Ectopic pregnancy in relation to previous induced abortion

    Journal of the American Medical Association

    (1985)
  • DickerD et al.

    Etiology of cervical pregnancy: association with abortion, pelvic pathology, IUDs and Asherman's syndrome

    Journal of Reproductive Medicine

    (1985)
  • DracP et al.

    Premature termination of pregnancy after previous interruption of pregnancy

    Ceskoslovenska Gynekologie

    (1970)
  • DziewulskaW

    Abortion in the past versus the fate of the subsequent pregnancy

    Ginekologia Polska

    (1973)
  • FrankPI

    Sequelae of induced abortion

  • FrankPI et al.

    Pregnancy following induced abortion: maternal morbidity, congenital abnormalities and neonatal death. Royal College of General Practitioners/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Joint Study

    British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

    (1987)
  • GrimesDA

    Complications from legally induced abortion: a review

    Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey

    (1979)
  • Cited by (75)

    • N<sup>o</sup> 360 - Avortement provoqué: avortement chirurgical et méthodes médicales au deuxième trimestre

      2018, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
      Citation Excerpt :

      Une association significative a été observée dans des études où le nombre de cas de GEU était faible, où des facteurs de risque importants étaient ignorés, ou dont le groupe témoin était inadéquat, et dans des études menées dans des pays où l'avortement est illégal et associé à des infections ou à la rétention de PC311,332,335–338. La majorité des études de cohorte rétrospectives et des études cas-témoin d'envergure dont le groupe témoin était adéquat et où les facteurs de confusion avaient bien été pris en compte n'ont trouvé aucun lien entre les antécédents d'AC et le risque de fausse couche332,338–346. Aucun rapport dose-effet n'a été prouvé339,343,345,347.

    • No. 360-Induced Abortion: Surgical Abortion and Second Trimester Medical Methods

      2018, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, 1 large cohort study346 showed an increased risk of miscarriage when women became pregnant within again less than 3 months of a first trimester IA (OR 4.06; 95% CI 1.98–8.31) regardless of abortion method. Significant associations between induced SA and subsequent miscarriage were observed in studies that failed to control for important risk factors or chose inadequate control groups.332,347,348 In addition, an association between miscarriage and IA via dilation and sharp curettage has been described.332

    • Cervical Insufficiency

      2016, Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text