Research reportIdentifying depression in the first postpartum year: guidelines for office-based screening and referral☆
Introduction
One out of eight women suffers an episode of depression after birth (Byrne, 1984, Kumar and Robinson, 1984, O’Hara et al., 1984, Kendell et al., 1981, Kendell et al., 1987, Cox et al., 1993, Pitt, 1968, Wisner et al., 1993) and 50% of these episodes are not recognized in busy clinical practices (Yonkers and Chantilis, 1995). Postpartum major depression (PPMD) substantially decreases the mothers’ ability to function and affects both new mothers and their families (Philipps and O’Hara, 1991). Children of women with PPMD are at increased risk for impaired cognitive and language development (Field et al., 1990). These children are shown to suffer from behavioral problems for at least 4 1/2 years (Philipps and O’Hara, 1991). Murray (1992) found that infants whose mothers suffered from PPMD showed impaired cognitive development compared to infants whose mothers had no history of depression or to infants whose mothers had a history of depression without postpartum onset. Identification and treatment of depression within the first year postpartum is a critical public health issue and clinicians need a simple screen to identify women who suffer from PPMD.
In the United Kingdom, home health care nurses routinely use the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS; Cox et al., 1987) to identify cases of PPMD (see Appendix A). The instrument is brief and contains ten items that are ranked from zero to three. Cox et al. (1987) suggested that a woman who has a total score of >10 on the EPDS should be evaluated for depression. Several investigators validated the EPDS in European community samples and non-postpartum women (Zelkowitz and Milet, 1995, Cox et al., 1996, Wickberg and Hwang, 1996, Murray and Carothers, 1990). At a score of 10, the EPDS has sensitivities that range from 91% (specificity 76%; Cox et al., 1987) to 88% (specificity 72%; Cox et al., 1996) when concurrent diagnoses were made by DSM-III-R or according to Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC; Zelkowitz and Milet, 1995, Cox et al., 1996, Wickberg and Hwang, 1996, Murray and Carothers, 1990, Harris et al., 1989).
In a sample of American postpartum women, O’Hara (1994) described the use of the EPDS. When a single measurement of depression was taken at 1 month postpartum, an EPDS score of 12 or 13 identified 86% of the cases when RDC was used as the gold standard for a diagnosis of both major and minor depression (O’Hara, 1994). The sensitivity of the EPDS was 72% and the specificity was 100% for major depression.
When used in a residency program, the EPDS increased the detection of PPMD from 6.3% of identified cases to 35.4% (Evins et al., 2000). After implementing the use of the EPDS in a community-based sample of 6-week postpartum women, researchers found that the rate of diagnosis of PPMD increased from 3.7% before EPDS use to 10.7% following routine screening (Georgiopoulos et al., 2001).
Many postpartum women seek help from their obstetricians or primary care physicians who commonly see women with depression in their practices (Yonkers and Chantilis, 1995). In a recent study, Heneghan et al. (2000) suggested that pediatricians take a role in identifying depression in the young mothers of their patients. Mothers who have had an episode of PPMD are justified in their concerns about recurrence, since 26% of these women will suffer an episode after another birth (Wisner et al., 2001). Having a self-report instrument available to these practitioners would help them to identify women in need of treatment. To our knowledge, ours is the first longitudinal study to use the EPDS as a screening tool for identifying current and future episodes of MD in a sample of American women who were at risk for experiencing PPMD.
Section snippets
Methods
This sub-study examines the relationship between the EPDS and recurrence of depression for 56 women who were part of a double-blind, randomized clinical trial (RCT; Wisner et al., 2001). Eligible women for the RCT (n=125) were pregnant (<35 weeks gestation) and were aged 18–45 years. Women met the following criteria for admission to the RCT: (1) they had experienced a previous episode of PPMD according to RDC (Spitzer et al., 1978) that occurred within the first 3 months postpartum and within 5
Results
The 56 women who began the study had a mean score on the HRSD of 28 (range 17–40, S.D. 5.65) for their previous postpartum episode. They were well during the index pregnancy as shown by a mean HRSD score of 4 (range 2–12, S.D. 2.5 at week 36). Four women refused medication after randomization, one woman was lost to follow-up 1 week after delivery, and one withdrew before completing the EPDS at week 4. The analysis reported for this sub-study included 50 women. The completion rates for the EPDS
Discussion
The design of this study provided the unique opportunity to assess the use of the EPDS as a screening tool for depression during the high-risk postpartum period. We found that a score of >9 was a strong and consistent indicator that women were suffering from PPMD at the time of completion of the screen. This score is similar to the score for recognizing PPMD as recommended by Cox et al. (1987). Some women experienced transient symptoms throughout the study and the EPDS weekly scores reflect
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by grant NIH-MH-53735, Prevention of Recurrent Episodes of Postpartum Depression: Nortriptyline vs Placebo.
References (29)
- et al.
Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in non-postnatal women
J. Affect. Disord.
(1996) - et al.
Mood changes in the first 3 weeks after childbirth
J. Affect. Disord.
(1981) - et al.
Recognition of depression in obstetric/gynecology practices
Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.
(1995) Guidelines for the treatment of the patient with major depression
Am. J. Psychiatry
(2000)Psychiatric morbidity in a gynaecology clinic: an epidemiological survey
Br. J. Psychiatry
(1984)- et al.
Detection of postnatal depression: development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
Br. J. Psychiatry
(1987) - et al.
A controlled study of the onset, duration, and prevalence of postnatal depression
Br. J. Psychiatry
(1993) - et al.
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Extracted from regular and change versions of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia
Arch. Gen. Psychiatry
(1981) - et al.
Postpartum depression: a comparison of screening and routine clinical evaluation
Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.
(2000) - et al.
Behavior-state matching and syncrony in mother–infant interactions of non-depressed versus depressed dyads
Dev. Psychol.
(1990)
Routine screening for postpartum depression
J. Fam. Pract.
A rating scale for depression
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry
The use of rating scales to identify post-natal depression
Br. J. Psychiatry
Do pediatricians recognize mothers with depressed symptoms?
Pediatrics
Cited by (76)
Effect of antenatal dietary interventions in maternal obesity on pregnancy weight-gain and birthweight: Healthy Mums and Babies (HUMBA) randomized trial
2019, American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyCitation Excerpt :At 28 weeks’ gestation, obstetric history and anthropometric measurements were obtained by the research midwife, and women completed the NZ Food Frequency-Short Form43 and NZ Physical Activity-Short Form questionnaires.44 At 36 weeks’ obstetric history and anthropometric measurements were obtained and women repeated the 3 psychological questionnaires.45-47 Compliance with capsules was defined as taking probiotic or placebo capsules >75% of the time and was assessed by participant verbal feedback at 28 weeks, 36 weeks and post-birth.
Postpartum depression: A multi-disciplinary approach to screening, management and breastfeeding support
2019, Archives of Psychiatric NursingGenerating an efficient version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in an urban obstetrical population
2017, Journal of Affective DisordersCitation Excerpt :The proposed cut-off by the developers is an EPDS >13 producing a specificity =78% and positive predictive value =73% (Cox et al., 1987; O’Hara and Swain, 1996).1 The EPDS has been associated with scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression ≥20 (Williams and Terman, 2003; Peindl et al., 2004). However, findings from other studies support a cut-point of EPDS ≥15 during pregnancy (Cox et al., 1987) though these cut-off scores vary depending on the version of the EPDS (Adouard et al., 2005).
Maternal depression is not just a problem early on
2016, Public HealthRepeated depression screening during the first postpartum year
2015, Annals of Family MedicineCitation Excerpt :The increasing prevalence of PPD up to 6 months' postpartum suggests later-onset PPD.2 No study has evaluated the impact of outcomes related to repeated PPD screening, and only a few have assessed depression screening tool scores beyond the early postpartum period.14–20 Among those few studies, most report on special populations with small sample sizes and limited generalizability.14–19
- ☆
The material in this paper was presented at the American Psychiatric Association Meeting, New Orleans, LA, May 5–10, 2001.