ViewpointShould radiologists change the way they report plain radiography of the spine?
References (13)
- et al.
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
Control Clin Trials
(1986) Acute low back problems in adults: assessment and treatment: clinical practice guideline number 14
(1994)Making the best use of a department of radiology: guidelines for doctors, 3rd edn
(1995)Early diagnostic evaluation of low back pain
J Gen Intern Med
(1986)- et al.
Use of lumbar radiographs for the early diagnosis of low back pain
JAMA
(1997) - et al.
Reducing roentgenography use: can patient expectations be altered?
Arch Intern Med
(1987)
Cited by (53)
Lumbar Discectomy
2016, Benzel's Spine Surgery: Techniques, Complication Avoidance and Management: Volume 1-2, Fourth EditionLumbar Imaging With Reporting Of Epidemiology (LIRE)-Protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized trial
2015, Contemporary Clinical TrialsCitation Excerpt :We describe a study that tests a strategy to mitigate the problematic consequences of potentially misleading lumbar spine imaging findings by including benchmark prevalence data in the routine imaging report. We adopted the concept of adding epidemiologic benchmarks from Roland and van Tulder, who proposed adding statements to plain film imaging reports describing the prevalence of different degenerative findings in patients without back pain. [7] A small, retrospective, pilot study published by our group suggested that patients who had the benchmark epidemiological information included in their radiology report were about three and a half times less likely to get a narcotic prescription compared with patients who did not get this information in their imaging report. [8]
Phraseology of disk herniation: An unproductive debate
2011, Clinical RadiologyDiscogenic pain, internal disc disruption, and radicular pain
2011, Pain Procedures in Clinical Practice: Expert Consult