Organizational culture in public accounting: Size, technology, rank, and functional area

https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(92)90018-NGet rights and content

Abstract

This study examines the nature of organizational culture in public accounting and demonstrates that different aspects of culture exist across and within public accounting firms. Organizational culture is defined in terms of values shared by members of an organization (or organizational sub-unit) that manifest themselves in the practices of that organization. Practices particularly important to the development and maintenance of culture include selection and socialization. The hypotheses state that different aspects of organizational culture vary across public accounting firms of different size and technology, and public accountants of different rank and functional area. These hypotheses are tested and largely supported with responses to a paper and pencil instrument, the Values Survey Module (Hofstede, Institute for Research on Intercultural Cooperation, 1982), which was completed by 338 public accountants across the United States. Implications for accountants and future research are also discussed.

References (51)

  • E.M. Bamber et al.

    The Audit Team and the Audit Review Process: an Organizational Approach

    Journal of Accounting Literature

    (1982)
  • E.M. Bamber et al.

    An Experimental Study of the Effects of Audit Structure in Uncertain Task Environments

    The Accounting Review

    (1988)
  • P.M. Blau

    Structural Effects

    American Sociological Review

    (1960)
  • B. Cushing et al.

    Comparisons of Audit Methodologies of Large Firms

    (1983)
  • M. Dirsmith et al.

    The Organic vs. the Mechanistic Audit

    Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance

    (1982)
  • M. Dirsmith et al.

    The Organic vs. the Mechanistic Audit: Problems and Pitfalls (Part II)

    Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance

    (1982)
  • A. Etzioni

    A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations

    (1961)
  • K. Ferris et al.

    Individual Behavior: Evidence from the Accounting Environment

  • K.L. Gregory

    Native View Paradigms: Multiple Cultures and Culture Conflicts in Organizations

    Administrative Science Quarterly

    (1983)
  • G. Hofstede

    Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values

    (1980)
  • G. Hofstede

    Values Survey Module and Scoring Guide

    (1982)
  • G. Hofstede

    The Cultural Context of Accounting

  • G. Hofstede et al.

    Measuring Organizational Culture: a Qualitative and Quantitative Study Across Twenty Cases

    Administrative Science Quarterly

    (1990)
  • J. Jiambalvo

    Performance Evaluation and Directed Job Effort: Model Development and Analysis in a CPA Firm Setting

    Journal of Accounting Research

    (1979)
  • J. Jiambalvo et al.

    Group and Organizational Issues in CPA Firm Research

  • Cited by (85)

    • The distraction effect of non-audit services on audit quality

      2021, Journal of Accounting and Economics
    • The revival of large consulting practices at the Big 4 and audit quality

      2020, Accounting, Organizations and Society
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, our findings are partially consistent with both the views of audit firms and the concerns stated by the PCAOB and provide the potential to guide future research. Organizational culture is “an elusive concept,” so we define it, based on management and accounting research, as a set of shared behavioral norms that define organizations and influence their practices (Carpenter et al., 1994; Dent, 1991, p. 708; Lander et al., 2013; Pratt & Beaulieu, 1992).6 Specifically, organizational culture is made up of “values shared by members of an organization that manifest themselves in the practices of that organization” (Pratt & Beaulieu, 1992, p. 667).

    • Internet-based technologies, accounting processes, and management control systems

      2024, Research Handbook on Accounting and Information Systems
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The authors are grateful for the comments made at the workshops at the University of Manchester, the University of Washington, the Pennsylvania State University, and Indiana University. The suggestions of Eric Noreen, D. Shores, Pete Dukes, Hein Schreuder, Michael J. Fischer, Mark Dirsmith, Jerry Salamon, Geert Hofstede, and an anonymous reviewer were especially helpful. This study has received support from the Peat Marwick Main and Company Research Opportunities in Auditing Foundation as well as the School of Business and the Accounting Development Fund at the University of Washington.

    View full text