General articleAdherence to colorectal cancer screening in an HMO population
References (41)
Occult blood screening for colorectal cancer: A critical review
Gastroenterology
(1985)- et al.
Participation in faetal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer
Soc Sci Med
(1983) Participation in the first and second round of a mass-screening for colorectal cancer
Soc Sci Med
(1984)- et al.
Predicting colon cancer screening behavior from health beliefs
Prev Med
(1984) - et al.
Participation in fecal occult blood screening: A critical review
Prev Med
(1987) - et al.
Assessment of attitudes toward mass screening for colorectal cancer and polyps
Prev Med
(1981) - et al.
Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening
Prev Med
(1990) Working Guideles for Early Cancer Detection Approved by the National Cancer Institute Advisory Board, Bethesda, MD, National Ancer Institute
(1987)Summary of Current Guidelines for the Cancer-Related Checkup: Recommendations
(February 1989)- et al.
Stool occult blood screening for colorectal cancer
J Fam Pract
(1982)
Colon cancer control study: An interim report
Early detection of bowel cancer at an urban public hospital: Demonstration project
CA
Hemoccult test as a routine screening procedure for colorectal disease in the private clinic setting
Can J Surg
Progress report on controlled trial of fecal occult blood testing for the detection of colorectal neoplasia
Cancer
Colorectal cancer screening by community programs
Front Gastrointest Res
Risks and benefits of mass screening for colorectal neoplasia with the stool guaiac test
CA
Comparative educational approaches to screening for colorectal cancer
Am J Public Health
Patient compliance with self-directed hemoccult testing
Prev Med
Factors affecting compliance with screening for colorectal cancer
Community Med
Screening for symptomless colon cancer by testing for occult blood in general practice
Lancet
Cited by (95)
Correlates of Patient Intent and Preference on Colorectal Cancer Screening
2017, American Journal of Preventive MedicineCitation Excerpt :The analysis was done on the cross-sectional baseline survey data from an RCT comparing an interactive web-based decision aid to a non-interactive one. Intent was chosen as the primary outcome, because it was the sociobehavioral variable most proximate to actual CRCS adherence, and previous studies showed a strong correlation between CRCS intent and adherence.14–17 A mechanistic pathway to intent and preference was investigated through mediation analysis, with perceived risk and self-efficacy as potential mediators.
Randomized controlled dissemination study of community-to-clinic navigation to promote CRC screening: Study design and implications
2017, Contemporary Clinical TrialsCitation Excerpt :Even in the context of primary care system contact, there continue to be a number of barriers to CRC screening, including insurance and cost issues [16,17]; transportation and other logistical (family, time off work) challenges [18–22]; ineffective doctor-patient communication [23]; lack of knowledge, misconceptions, and fear [17,22–27]. Absence of symptoms have been shown to be significant reasons for non-adherence with both stool blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy [21,28,29–32]. Most importantly, health care provider failure to recommend CRC screening or not having a usual source of care also hinders early detection and prevention efforts [21,25,30,33–37].
Effects of personalized colorectal cancer risk information on laypersons' interest in colorectal cancer screening: The importance of individual differences
2015, Patient Education and CounselingCitation Excerpt :We conducted an experiment designed to evaluate the effects of personalized, quantitative CRC risk information, produced by the NCI CCRAT, on laypersons’ interest in CRC screening, and to identify factors that influence these effects. Screening interest is a strong predictor of actual screening behavior [9,10,14–17] and thus a useful and important proxy outcome for exploring the effects of personalized risk information. The objective of our study was not only to assess the average effects of personalized cancer risk information on CRC screening interest, but to explore how these effects differ among individuals.
Colorectal cancer screening mode preferences among US veterans
2009, Preventive MedicineCitation Excerpt :Physician recommendation and previous screening behavior explained the most variance in our multivariate models. Other studies have identified physician recommendation as an important predictor in CRC screening compliance (Bejes and Marvel, 1992; Lemon et al., 2001; Myers et al., 1990; Seeff et al., 2004; Wee et al., 2005; Zapka et al., 2002). One implication of these findings is that, as sites expand their offerings, preferences are likely to evolve.
Initial and continued adherence with bladder cancer screening in an occupationally exposed cohort
2011, Journal of Occupational and Environmental MedicineCitation Excerpt :In addition to the general screening survey, a validated instrument used in a study to measure factors related to colorectal cancer screening adherence for a cohort of white, blue-collar, male automobile workers was modified to focus on bladder cancer.27 Vernon et al27 used items and scales from two studies of colorectal screening adherence.5,28 Several constructs included in both research studies have a long history in research on adherence with recommended health actions, including perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, benefits/costs or perceived utility from the Health Belief Model (HBM), behavioral intention from the theory of reasoned action,29,30 and subjective norms or social influence from social cognitive theory.31
Results of an African American-targeted norm-based colorectal cancer screening intervention: a pilot study
2023, Journal of Behavioral Medicine