Skip to main content
Log in

The Role of Primary Care Physicians in Cancer Care

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

The demand for oncology services in the United States (US) is increasing, whereas a shortage of oncologists looms. There is the need for a better understanding of the involvement of primary care physicians (PCPs) in cancer care.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the role of PCPs in cancer care, compare it with that of oncologists, and identify factors explaining greater PCP involvement in cancer care.

DESIGN

National survey of physicians caring for cancer patients conducted by the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium.

PARTICIPANTS

1694 PCPs; 1621 oncologists.

MEASUREMENTS

Questionnaires mailed during 2005 and 2006 examined the participation of physicians in 12 aspects of care for cancer patients.

MAIN RESULTS

Over 90% of PCPs fulfilled general medical care roles for patients with cancer such as managing comorbid conditions, chronic pain, or depression; establishing do-not-resuscitate status; and referring patients to hospice. Oncologists were less involved in these roles. Determining the treatment preferences of individual patients and deciding on the use of surgery were the only cancer care roles in which ≥50% of PCPs participated. Twenty-two percent of PCPs reported no direct involvement in cancer care roles while 19% reported heavy involvement. PCPs who were aged ≥50 years, were internists or geriatricians, taught medical students, saw more cancer patients, or experienced referral barriers fulfilled more roles. Rural practice location was not associated with greater PCP involvement in cancer care.

CONCLUSIONS

PCPs across the US have an active role in cancer patient management. Determining the optimal interface between PCPs and oncologists in delivering and coordinating cancer care is an important area for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Institute of Medicine. Fulfilling the Potential of Cancer Prevention and Early Detection. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2007. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Erickson C, Salsberg E, Forte G, Bruinooge S, Goldstein M. Future supply and demand for oncologists: challenges to assuring access to oncology services. J Oncol Pract. 2007;3:79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Warren JL, Mariotto AB, Meekins A, Topor M, Brown ML. Current and future utilization of services from medical oncologists. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3242–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bodenheimer T. Primary care: will it survive? N Engl J Med. 2006;355:861–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Williams PT. The role of family physicians in the management of cancer patients. J Cancer Educ. 1994;9:67–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Worster A, Wood ML, McWhinney IR, Bass MJ. Who provides follow-up care for patients with early breast cancer? Can Fam Physician. 1995;41:1314–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Worster A, Bass MJ, Wood ML. Willingness to follow breast cancer: survey of family physicians. Can Fam Physician. 1996;42:263–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Grunfeld E, Levine MN, Julian JA, et al. Randomized trial of long-term follow-up for early-stage breast cancer: a comparison of family physician versus specialist care. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:848–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Keating NL, Landrum MB, Guadagnoli E, Winer EP, Ayanian JZ. Surveillance testing among survivors of early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1074–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Snyder CF, Earle CC, Herbert RJ, Neville BA, Blackford AL, Frick KD. Trends in follow-up and preventive care for colorectal cancer survivors. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:254–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Norman A, Sisler J, Hack T, Harlos M. Family physicians and cancer care: palliative care patients’ perspectives. Can Fam Physician. 2001;47:2009–16.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hickner J, Kent S, Naragan P, Hunt L. Physicians’ and patients’ views of cancer care by family physicians: a report from the American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network. Fam Med. 2007;39:126–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ayanian JZ, Chrischilles EA, Fletcher RH, et al. Understanding cancer treatment and outcome: the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2992–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. National Cancer Institute. Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium. Last accessed June 22, 2009 at http://healthservices.cancer.gov/cancors/.

  16. Keating NL, Landrum MB, Klabunde CN, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer: do physicians agree about the importance of patient age and comorbidity? J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2532–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Little RJ, Rubin DB. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York, NY: Wiley; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  18. He Y, Zaslavsky AM. Imputation in a multiformat and multiwave survey of cancer care. Proceedings in Health Policy Statistics, American Statistical Association, 2007.

  19. University of Washington Rural Health Research Center. Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) Codes. Last accessed June 22, 2009 at: http://depts.washington.edu/uwruca.

  20. Institute of Medicine. From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ko C, Chaudhry S. The need for a multidisciplinary approach to cancer care. J Surg Res. 2002;105:53–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Reich M. Depression and cancer: recent data on clinical issues, research challenges and treatment approaches. Curr Opin Oncol. 2008;20:353–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mao JJ, Armstrong K, Bowman MA, Xie SX, Kadakia R, Farrar JT. Symptom burden among cancer survivors: impact of age and comorbidity. J Am Board Fam Med. 2007;20:434–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Smith AW, Reeve BB, Bellizzi KM, Harlan LC, Klabunde CN, Amsellem M, et al. Cancer, comorbidities, and health-related quality of life of older adults. Health Care Financ Rev. 2008;29:41–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lloyd-Williams M, Shiels C, Taylor F, Dennis M. Depression: an independent predictor of early death in patients with advanced cancer. J Affect Disord. 2009;113:127–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Passik SD, Dugan W, McDonald MV, et al. Oncologists’ recognition of depression in their patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:1594–600.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hubbard G, Kidd L, Donaghy E. Preferences for involvement in treatment decision making of patients with cancer: a review of the literature. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008;12:299–318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Snyder CF, Earle CC, Herbert RJ, Neville BA, Blackford AL, Frick KD. Preventive care for colorectal cancer survivors: a 5-year longitudinal study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1073–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Keating NL, Landrum MB, Guadagnoli E, Winer EP, Ayanian JZ. Factors related to underuse of surveillance mammography among breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:85–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Keating NL, Landrum MB, Guadagnoli E, Winer EP, Ayanian JZ. Care in the months before death and hospice enrollment among older women with advanced breast cancer. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;23:11–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Institute of Medicine. Ensuring Quality Cancer Care. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schrag D. Communication and coordination: the key to quality. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6452–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ayanian JZ, Zaslavsky AM, Guadagnoli E, et al. Patients’ perceptions of quality of care for colorectal cancer by race, ethnicity, and language. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6576–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bodenheimer T. Coordinating care: a perilous journey through the health care system. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1064–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Bowles EJA, Tuzzio L, Wiese CJ, et al. Understanding high-quality cancer care. Cancer. 2008;112:934–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hart LG, Skillman SM, Fordyce M, Thompson M, Hagopian A, Konrad TR. International medical graduate physicians in the United States: changes since 1981. Health Aff. 2007;26:1159–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Onega T, Duell EJ, Shi X, Wang D, Demidenko E, Goodman D. Geographic access to cancer care in the U.S. Cancer. 2008;112:909–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute to the CanCORS Statistical Coordinating Center and Primary Data Collection and Research Centers: U01 CA093344, U01 CA093332, U01 CA093324, U01 CA093348, U01 CA093329, U01 CA01013, U01 CA093326, and by a grant from the Department of Veteran’s Affairs to the Durham VA Medical Center, U01 CDA093344 (MOU) and HARO 03-438MO-03.

Conflict of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carrie N. Klabunde PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klabunde, C.N., Ambs, A., Keating, N.L. et al. The Role of Primary Care Physicians in Cancer Care. J GEN INTERN MED 24, 1029–1036 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1058-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1058-x

KEY WORDS

Navigation