Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validity of self-reports of breast cancer treatment in low-income, medically underserved women with breast cancer

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Few studies have assessed the agreement between subjects’ self-report and medical records among patients with breast cancer (BC), and none has addressed this issue in low-income women with BC. We assessed the level of agreement between self-report and medical records data for key BC treatment and prognostic characteristics using correct proportion and the Kappa statistic, among 726 low-income BC patients. Unconditional regression was used to investigate the association between accuracy of self-report and potential explanatory factors. Overall agreement between self-report and medical records was 95.3–99.6% for BC treatments including surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hormone therapy (Kappa = 0.79–0.99). Specific agreement was 87–89.5% for surgery type (Kappa = 0.51–0.96); 86.3% for chemotherapy completion (Kappa = 0.46) and 98.7% for radiotherapy completion (Kappa = 0.43); 95.2% for medical oncologist consultation (Kappa = 0.59) and 96% for radiation oncologist consultation; 97.3% for metastasis (Kappa = 0.56); and 93.6% for recurrence (Kappa = 0.30). When accepting answers within 15 days of the medical record date, 78.2% of women correctly reported surgery date, yet only around 55% of women correctly reported the start and/or end date of radiotherapy. Older age, less education, BC recurrence and poor patient–physician communication were associated with the lesser accuracy of patients’ self-report compared to medical records (P < 0.05). The results of this study suggest that self-reporting of key treatment and prognostic information is relatively accurate among low-income women with BC. Self-report seems to be a reliable source for accurate information when medical record review is unavailable or unfeasible. Interventions to enhance patient–physician communication may facilitate more accurate information reporting among vulnerable populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer (2008) Available from URL: http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopic/types/breast. Accessed 29 May 2008

  2. Halpern MT, Bian J, Wand EM et al (2007) Insurance status and stage of cancer at diagnosis among women with breast cancer. Cancer 110:231–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Breen N, Kessler LG, Brown ML (1996) Breast cancer control among the underserved–an overview. Breast Cancer Res Treat 40:105–115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Samet JM, Hunt WC, Farrow DC (1994) Determinants of receiving breast-conserving surgery. The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program, 1983–1986. Cancer 73:2344–2351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sudman S, Bradburn NM (1974) Response effects in surveys. Adeline, Hawthorne

    Google Scholar 

  6. Andersen RM, Kasper J, Frankel MR et al (1979) Total survey error: applications to improve health surveys. Jossey Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  7. Roberts RO, Bergstralh EJ, Schmidt L et al (1996) Comparison of self-reported and medical records health care utilization measures. J Clin Epidemiol 49:989–995

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Beckles GL, Williamson DF, Brown AF et al (2007) Agreement between self-reports and medical records was only fair in a cross-sectional study of performance of annual eye examinations among adults with diabetes in managed care. Med Care 45:876–883

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tisnado DM, Adams JL, Liu H et al (2006) What is the concordance between the medical record and patient self-report as data sources for ambulatory care? Med Care 44:132–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Khoja S, McGregor SE, Hilsden RJ (2007) Validation of self-reported history of colorectal cancer screening. Can Fam Physician 53:1192–1197

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Maunsell E, Drolet M, Ouhoummane N et al (2005) Breast cancer survivors accurately reported key treatment and prognostic characteristics. J Clin Epidemiol 58:364–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Phillips KA, Milne RL, Buys S et al (2005) Agreeement between self-reported breast cancer treatment and medical records in a population-based breast cancer family registry. J Clin Oncol 23:4679–4686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen JY, Diamant AL, Thind A et al (2008) Determinates of breast cancer knowledge among newly diagnosed, low-income, medically underserved women with breast cancer. Cancer 112:1153–1161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wallihan DB, Stump TE, Callahan CM (1999) Accuracy of self-reported health services use and patterns of care among urban older adults. Med Care 37:662–670

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ritter PL, Stewart H, Kaymaz DS et al (2001) Self-reports of health care utilization compared to provider records. J Clin Epidemiol 54:136–141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schmitz MF, Russell DW, Cutrona CE (2002) The validity of self-reports of physician use among the older population. J Appl Gerontol 21:203–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Marshall SF, Deapen D, Allen M et al (2003) Validating california teachers study self-reports of recent hospitalization: comparison with California hospital discharge data. Am J Epidemiol 158:1012–1020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Raina P, Torrance-Rynard V, Wong M et al (2002) Agreement between self-reported and routinely collected health-care utilization data among seniors. Health Serv Res 37:7517–7574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Maly RC, Leake B, Silliman RA (2003) Health care disparities in older patients with breast carcinoma: informational support from physicians. Cancer 97:1517–1527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Maly RC, Frank JC, Marshall GN et al (1998) Perceived efficacy in patient-physician interactions (PEPPI): validation of an instrument in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 46:889–894

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Marin G, Sabogal F, VanOss MB, Otero-Sabogal R, Perez-Stable E (1987) Development of a short acculturation scale for Hispanics. Hisp J Behav Sci 9:183–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fleiss JL (1998) Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:363–374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Maunsell E, Drolet M, Brisson J et al (2004) Work situation after breast cancer: results from a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:1813–1822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brwon R, Kulik J (1992) Flashbulb memories. In: Neisser U (ed) Memory observed. Freeman and Co, San Francisco, pp 23–40

    Google Scholar 

  26. Burgess C, Ramirez A, Richards M et al (1998) Who and what influences delayed presentation in breast cancer? Br J Cancer 77:1343–1348

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Foddy W (1993) Construction questions for Interviews and questionnaires. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Stone AA, Turkkane JS, Bachran C et al (2000) The science of self-report. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cronan TA, Walen HR (2002) Accuracy of self-reported health care use in patients with osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 29:2181–2184

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. McPhee SJ, Nguyen TT, Shema SJ et al (2002) Validation of recall of breast and cervical cancer screening by women in an ethnically diverse population. Prev Med 35:463–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rohrbvaugh M, Rogers JC (1994) What id the doctor do? When physicians and patients disagree. Arch Fam Med 3:125–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Luck J, Peabody JW, Drsselhaus TR et al (2000) How well dose chart abstraction measure quality? JAMA 283:1715–1722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the American Cancer Society (# TURSG-02-081), the California Breast Cancer Research Program (# 7PB-0070) and the National Institute of Health (# 1R01CA119197-01A1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rose C. Maly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Diamant, A.L., Thind, A. et al. Validity of self-reports of breast cancer treatment in low-income, medically underserved women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 119, 745–751 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-009-0447-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-009-0447-5

Keywords

Navigation