Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A prospective analysis of 13,580 colonoscopies

Reevaluation of credentialing guidelines

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aims of this study were to assess the safety and efficacy of surgeons performing colonoscopy, and to use the results to reevaluate currently available credentialing guidelines.

Methods

A prospective outcomes study was designed to include all members of the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). End points were related to the efficacy and safety of colonoscopy. Credentialing guidelines were reviewed.

Results

Between April 1998 and September 1999 13,580 colonoscopies were prospectively entered into a database. The most common indications were rectal bleeding, colonic polyps, and change in bowel habits. The colonoscopy was normal or revealed only diverticulosis or nonspecific inflammation in 8,473 (62.4%), lower gastrointestinal bleeding in 4 (0.03%), polyps in 4,645 (34.2%), and tumors in 458 (3.4%) patients. The most common biopsy methods for polyps or tumors were the snare (n = 1,728; 34%), the hot (n = 1,600; 31%), and the cold (n=1,340; 22%) procedures. The colonoscopy was complete in 12,495 cases (92%), requiring a mean procedure time of 22.7 min (range, 1-170 min). Intraprocedural complications included arrhythmia (n = 14; 0.1%), bradycardia (n = 115; 0.8%), hypotension (n = 171; 1.2%), and hypoxia (n = 806; 5.6%). Postprocedural complications were seen in 27 patients (0.2%). Bleeding (n = 10; 0.07%) was managed by observation alone (n= 9; 0.06%) and repeat colonoscopy with transfusion (n = 1; 0.01%). Perforation (n = 10; 0.07%) was treated successfully by observation with conservative management (n = 5; 0.05%) and surgery (n = 5; 0.05%); severe abdominal pain (n = 4; 0.03%) was managed by observation and conservative therapy; and broncho-spasm (n = 2; 0.015%) was managed by observation and supportive care. One single mortality (0.007%) was that of a 70-year-old man with a massive lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage who had a cardiac arrest in the recovery room following colonoscopy. The complication rate was not significantly associated statistically with either the level of experience or the number of prior or annual colonoscopies. However, prior colonoscopic experience did have an impact on the completion rate (p < 0.001) and was inversely proportional to the time to completion (p < 0.001). Similarly, the number of annual colonoscopies affected the completion rate and was inversely correlated with the time to completion (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

This large prospective outcomes study showed that colonoscopy performed by surgeons can be rapidly and successfully done with acceptably low morbidity and mortality. There was no association between experience and complications. However, a minimum of 50 prior colonoscopies and 100 annual colonoscopies were associated with a significant improvement in the rate of completion. There was also a significant correlation between both prior and ongoing annual experience and the time required for the examination. No minimum number of cases can be mandated for credentialing to perform “safe” colonoscopies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aldridge MC, Sim AJW (1986) Colonoscopy findings in symptomatic patients without x-ray evidence of colonic neoplams. Lancet 2: 833–834

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopists (1992, August) Methods of granting hospital privileges to perform gastrointestinal endoscopy. ASGE Publication 1012, Massachusetts

  3. Barthel JS, Marsall JB (1992) The frequency of total colonoscopy [letter]. Mayo Clin Proc 67: 1120

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Basson MD, Etter L, Panzini L (1993) Rates of colonoscopic perforation in current practice [letter]. Ann Int Med 118: 1115

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bat L, Williams CB (1989) Usefullness of pediatric colonoscopes in adult colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 35: 329–332

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Benner K, Katon R (1983) Colonoscopy performance in a training setting [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 29: 188

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bhargava DK, Vis JC, Berry M (1981) Diagnostic colonoscopy. Ind J Med Res 73: 106–114

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brynitz S, Kjaergard H, Struckmann J (1986) Perforations from colonoscopy during diagnosis and treatment of polyps. Ann Chir Gynecol 75: 142–145

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Caripo G, Albu E, Gumbs MA, Gerst PH (1989) Management of colonic perforation after colonoscopy: report of 3 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 32: 624–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cass OW, Freeman ML, Cohen J, Zuckerman G, Watkins J, Nord J, Locke GR, Jensen D, Diehl D, Cerulli M, Lyche K, Fennerty M, Edmundowicz S, Etzkorn K, Al-Kawas F, Cave D, Lehman G, ACES Study Group (1998) Acquisition of competency in endoscopic skills (ACES) during training: a multicenter study [abstract] Gastrointest Endosc 43: 308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cass OW, Freeman ML, Peine CJ, Zera R, Onstad GR (1993) Objective evaluation of endoscopic skills during training. Ann Intern Med 118:40–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chak A, Cooper GS, Blades EW, Canto M, Sivak MV (1996) Prospective assessment of colonoscopic intubation skills in trainees. Gastrointest Endosc 44: 54–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chiang CK, Bonnano CA (1992) The completeness of colonoscopy in a university-affiliated teaching hospital [abstract]. Gastroenterology 102: A7

    Google Scholar 

  14. Christie JP, Marrazzo J (1991) Mini perforation of the colon: not all postpolypectomy perforations require laparotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 34: 132–135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Church JM (1994) Complete colonoscopy: how often? And if not, why not? Am J Gastroenterol 89: 556–560

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cirocco WC, Rusin LC (1995) Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 38: 964–968

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. (1997) Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance Clinical Guidelines and Rationale. Gastroenterology 112: 594–642

  18. Cosgrove JM, Cohen JR, Wait RB, Margolis IB (1995) Endoscopy training during general surgery residency. Surg Laparosc Endosc 42: 287–291

    Google Scholar 

  19. Damore LJ II, Rantis PC, Vernava AMIII (1996) Colonoscopic perforations: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Dis Colon Rectum 39: 1308–1314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dubas F, Rohner A (1985) Perforations colo-rectales iatrogenes. Helv Chir Acta 52: 681–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Durdey P, Weston PMT, Willians NS (1987) Colonoscopy or barium enema as initial investigation of colonic disease. Lancet 2: 549–551

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ettersperger L, Zeitoun P, Thiefin G (1995) Colonic perforations complicating colonoscopy: apropos of 15 consecutive cases observed over 16 years. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 19: 8–22

    Google Scholar 

  23. Farley DR, Bannon MP, Zietlow SP, Pemberton JH, Ilstrop DM, Larson DR (1997) Management of colonoscopic perforations. Mayo Clin Proc 72: 729–733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Federation of Digestive Disease Societies (1979) Guidelines for training in endoscopy. ASGE, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fleischer D, Al-Kawas F, Benjamin S, Lewis JH, Kidwell J (1991) Anatomic extent during colonoscopy: medical, legal, economic implications. Gastrointest Endosc 37: 262

    Google Scholar 

  26. Foliente RL, Chang AC, Youssef AI, Ford LJ, Condon SC, Chen YK (1996) Endoscopie cecal perforation: mechanisms of injury. Am J Gastroenterol 91: 705–708

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Forde KA (1992) Therapeutic colonoscopy. World J Surg 16: 1048–1053

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Freidrichs D (1983) Diagnose und therapie der endoskopischen Dickdarmperforation. Med Wert 34: 75–76

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fruhmorgen P, Demling L (1979) Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy in the Federal Republic of Germany: results of an inquiry. Endoscopy 11: 146–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Galandiuk S, Ahmad P (1998) Impact of sedation and resident teaching on complications of colonoscopy. Dis Surg 15: 60–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Garbay JR, Suc B, Rotman N, Fourtanier G, Escat J (1996) Multicenter study of surgical complications of colonoscopy. Br J Surg 83: 42–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Geenen JE, Schmidt MG, Wu WC, Hogan WJ (1975) Major complications of colonoscopy: bleeding and perforation. Ann Dig Dis 20: 231–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Gelfand DW, Routh WD, Cowan RJ (1992) Diagnostic imaging in gastrointestinal hemorrhage. In: Sugawa C Schuman BM Lucas CE (eds) Gastrointestinal bleeding. Igaku-Shoin, New York, pp 207

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gilbert DA, Shaneyfelt SL, Silverstein FE, Mahler AK, Hallstrom AP, ‚ members of ASGE(1984) The national ASGE colonoscopy survery: analysis of colonoscopy practices and yield [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 30: 143

    Google Scholar 

  35. Habr-Gama A, Wave JD (1989) Complications and hazards of gastrointestinal endoscopy. 13: 193–201

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hall C, Dorricott NJ, Donovan IA, Neoptolemos JP (1991) Colon perforation during colonoscopy: surgical versus conservative management. Br J Surg 78: 542–544

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) (1997) Key points excerpted from Federal Register Notice on Colorectal Cancer Screening and Barium Enema. Federal Register 62.

  38. Hollerl G, Stenzel B, Stadler H (1980) Prophylasxe and therapier der Dickdarmperforation bie der diagnostischen fiberosikopie. Z Gastroenterol 18: 376–378

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Irvine EJ, O’Connor J, Frost RA, Shorvon P, Somers S, Stevenson GW, Hunt RH (1988) Prospective comparison of double-contrast barium enema plus flexible sigmoidoscopy versus colonoscopy in rectal bleeding. Gut 29: 1188–1193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Jentschura D, Raute M, Winter J, Henkel T, Kraus M, Manegold BC (1994) Complications of endoscopy of the lower GI tract: therapy and prognosis. Surg Endosc 8: 672–676

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Johnson H (1993) Management of major complications encountered with the flexible colonoscope. N Natl Med Assoc 85: 916–920

    Google Scholar 

  42. Jourdan VI, Rendall M, McColl I (1981) Colonoscopy: a survey of its value in a teaching hospital surgical unit. J Roy Soc Med 74: 485–489

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kundrotas LW, Clement DJ, Kubik CM, Robinson AB, Wolfe PA (1994) A prospective evaluation of successful terminal ileum intubation during routine colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 40: 544–546

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Lo AY, Benton HL (1994) Selective management of colonoscopic perforation. J Am Coll Surg 179: 333–337

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Luchette TA, Doerr RJ, Kulaylat M, Stephan RM, Hassett JM (1992) Colonoscopic impaction in left colon strictures resulting in right colon pneumatic perforation. Surg Endosc 6: 273–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Macrae FA, Tan KG, Williams CB (1983) Towards safer colonoscopy: a report on the complications of 5,000 diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopies. Gut 24: 376–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, Snover DC, Bradley GM, Schuman LM, Ederer F (1993) Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. N Engl J Med 328: 1365–1371

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Marshall JB (1995) Technical proficiency of trainees performing colonoscopy: a learning curve. Gastrointest Endosc 42: 287–291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Marshall JB, Barthel JS (1993) The frequency of total colonoscopy and terminal ileal intubation in the 1990s. Gastrointest Endosc 39: 518–520

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Nivatvongs S (1986) Complications in colonoscopic polypectomy: an experience with 1,555 polypectomies. Dis Colon Rectum 29: 82–85

    Google Scholar 

  51. Nivatvongs S (1988) Complications in colonoscopic polypectomy: lessons to learn from an experience with 1,576 polyps. AM Surg 62: 61–63

    Google Scholar 

  52. Obrecht WFJr, Wu WC, Gelfand DW, Ott JD (1984) The extent of successful colonoscopy: a second assessment using modem equipment. Gastrointest Radiol 9: 161–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. O’Connor JJ (1977) Colonoscopy in a community hospital. Am Surg 43: 483–487

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Orsoni P, Berdah S, Verrier C, Caamano A, Sastre B, Boutboul R, Grimaud JC (1997) Colonic perforation due to colonoscopy: a retrospective study of 48 cases. Endoscopy 29: 160–164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Overholt F (1975) Progress in gastroenterology: colonoscopy: a review. Gastroenterology 68: 1308–1320

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Parra-Blanco A, Kaminaga N., Kojimo T, Endo Y, Uragami N, Okawa N, Harroti T, Takahashi H, Fujita R (2000) Hemoclipping for post-polypectomy with postbiopsy colonic bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc51:37–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Parry BR, Williams SM (1991) Competency and the colonoscopist: a learning curve. Aust N Z J Surg 61: 419–422

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Puchner R, Allinger S, Doblhofer F, Wallner M, Knoflach P (1996) Complications of diagnostic and interventional colonoscopy. Wien Klin Wochenschr 108: 142–146

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Rai S, Moran R, Rai AM (1996) Are colonoscopies performed by subspecialists more expensive [abstract]. Dis Colon Rectum 39: A2

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ravi J, BrodmerkelGI, Agrawal RM, Gregory DH, Ashok PS (1988) Does prior abdominal or pelvic surgery affect length of insertion of the colonoscope? [abstract] Endoscopy 20 (Suppl 2): 43

    Google Scholar 

  61. Reed DN, Collins JD, Wyatt WJ, Hull JE, Patton MC, Dahm SO, Dabideen HH, Hudson JC, Allen DB (1992) Can general surgeons perform colonoscopy safely? Am J Surg 163: 257–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Reiertsen O, Skift J, Jacobsen CD, Rosseland AR (1987) Complications of fiberoptic gastroendoscopy: 5 years experience in a central hospital. Endoscopy 19: 1–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Rex DK, Weddle RA, Lehman GA, Pound DC, O’Connor KW, Hawes RH, Dittus RS, Lappas JC, Lumeng L (1990) Flexible sigmoidoscopy plus air contrast barium enema versus colonoscopy for suspected lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroenterology 98: 855–861

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Rogers BH, Silvis SE, Nebel OT, Sugawa C, Mandelstam P (1975) Complications of flexible fiberoptic colonoscopy and polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 22: 73–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Rogge JD, ElmoreMF, Mahoney SJ, Brown ED, Troiano FP, Dr Wagner Black DJ, Pound DC (1994) Low-cost, office-based screening colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 89: 1775–1780

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Sakai Y (1972) The techniques of colon fiberoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 15: 403–412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Smith LE (1976) Fiberoptic colonoscopy: complications for colonoscopy and polypectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 19: 407–412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Smith LE, Nivatvongs S (1975) Complications in colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 18: 214–220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (1992, January) Granting of privileges for gastrointestinal endoscopy by surgeons. SAGES Publication #11

  70. Soon JC, Shang NS, Goh PMY, Rauff A (1990) Perforation of the large bowel during colonoscopy in Singapore. Am Surg 56: 285–288

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Stark MT, Fleischer DE, Al-Kawas FH, Lewis JH, Nguyen CC, Arigan ML, Reilly HR, Bull-Henry KP, Benjamin SB (1992) Are previous abdominal surgery and colonic diverticula important determinants for the anatomic extent of colonoscopic examination? [abstract] Gastroenterology 102(suppl): A27

    Google Scholar 

  72. Vernava AM, Longo WE (1996) Complications in endoscopic polypectomy. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 5: 663–673

    Google Scholar 

  73. Vincent M, Smith LE (1983) Management of perforation due to colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 26: 61–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Waye JD, Bashkoff E (1991) Total colonoscopy: is it always possible? Gastrointest Endosc 37: 152–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Waye JD, Lewis BS, Yessayan S (1992) Colonoscopy: a prospective report of complications. Clin Gastroenterol 15: 347–351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Webb WA, McDaniel L, Jones L (1985) Experience with 1,000 colonoscopic polypectomies. Ann Surg 201: 626–632

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Wexner SD, Förde KA, Sellers G, Geron N, Lopes A, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ (1998) How well do surgeons perform colonoscopy? Surg Endosc 12: 1410–1414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Wigton RS, Blank LL, Monsour H, Nicolas JA (1990) Procedural skills of practicing gastroenterologists: a national survey of 700 members of the American College of Physicians. Ann Int Med 113: 540–546

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Wolff WI, Shinya H (1971) Colonofiberoscopy. JAMA 217: 1509

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Wolff WI, Shinya H (1973) Polypectomy via the fiberoptic colonoscope. N Engl J Med 288: 329

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Zubarik R, Fleischer DE, Mastropietro C, Lopez J, Carroll J, Benjamin S, Eisen G (1999) Prospective analysis of complications 30 days after outpatient colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 50: 322–328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 3000 West Cypress Creek Road, 33309, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA

    S. D. Wexner, J. E. Garbus & J. J. Singh

Authors
  1. S. D. Wexner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. E. Garbus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. J. Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

The SAGES Colonoscopy Outcomes Study Group

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wexner, S.D., Garbus, J.E., Singh, J.J. et al. A prospective analysis of 13,580 colonoscopies. Surg Endosc 15, 251–261 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640080147

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640080147

Key words

Search

Navigation