Skip to main content
Log in

Colorectal screening patterns and perceptions of risk among African-American users of a community health center

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated risk perceptions and screening patterns for colorectal cancer among predominately low-income African-Americans age 50 and older who used a community health center. The majority of respondents either rated their risk as below average (36%) or did not know their risk (37%) for colorectal cancer. Individuals who provided a risk estimate versus those who did not know their risk were younger and held more accurate beliefs about colorectal cancer. Attributions of perceived risk best distinguished respondents who evaluated their risk to be below average versus average and above average. Compared to respondents who could not explain their risk, those who provided psychological, personal action, and heredity causes were more likely to view their risk as below average than average or above average. In comparison to national norms, these subjects reported higher frequencies of ever having had a digital rectal exam (DRE, 90%), fecal occult blood test (FOBT, 75%) and sigmoidoscopy (SIG, 33%). Moreover, 63%, 53%, and 81% reported their most recent screening for DRE, FOBT, and SIG, respectively, in accordance with ACS and NCI recommended guidelines. However, a subsequent medical audit failed to confirm these self-reports. These results suggest that: 1) educational efforts are needed to enhance knowledge and accuracy of risk perceptions for colorectal cancer; 2) further studies on attributions of risk are needed that may prove useful for developing intervention programs, and 3) studies need to interpret self-report data for colorectal cancer with caution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Potter JD, Slattery ML, Bostick RM, & Gapstur SM. Colon cancer: A review of epidemiology.Epidemiol Rev 1993; 15: 499–545.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Greenwald P. Colon cancer overview.Cancer 1992; 70: 1206–1215.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mayberry RM, Coates RJ, Hill HA, et al. Determinants of black/white differences in colon cancer survival.JNCI 1995; 87: 1686–1693.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wingo PA, Tong T, Bolden S. Cancer statistics, 1995.CA 1995; 45: 8–30.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sox HC, Woolf SH. Evidence-based practice guidelines from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.JAMA 1993; 269:2678.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Healthy People 2000: National health promotion and disease prevention objectives. US Department of Health and Human Services. DHHS Pub No. (PHS) 95-1256-1.

  7. Breen N, & Kessler L. Current trends in cancer screening: 1987 and 1992.MMWR 1996; 26:57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jepson C, Kessler GL, Portnoy B, Gibbs, T. Black-White differences in cancer prevention knowledge and behavior.Am J Public Health 1991; 81: 501–504.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Myers RE, Trock BJ, Lerman C, Wolf T, Ross E, & Engstrom PF. Adherence to colorectal screening in an HMO population.Prev Med 1990; 19: 502–514.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sandler RS, Devillis BM, Blalock SJ, Holland KL. Participation of high-risk subjects in colon cancer screening.Cancer 1989; 63: 2211–2215.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Huffman A, Abcarian H. Six years of occult blood screening in an urban public hospital: Concepts, methods, and reflections on approaches to reducing avoidable mortality among black Americans.J Natl Medl Assoc 1991; 83: 994–999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Janz NK, Becker MH. The Health Belief Model: A decade later.Health Educ Q 1984; 11: 1–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rogers RW. Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appraisals: A revised theory of protection motivation. In JT Cacioppo and RE Petty (Eds).Social Psychophysiology. A sourcebook. New York: Guilford, 1983, pp 153–176.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Weinstein ND. The precaution adoption process.Health Psychol 1988; 7: 355–386.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Blalock SJ, Devellis BM, & Sandier RS. Participation in fecal occult blood screening: A critical review.Prev Med 1987; 18: 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Blalock SJ, Devillis BM, Afifi RA, & Sandier RS. Risk perceptions and participation in colorectal cancer screening.Health Psychol 1990; 9: 792–806.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. MaCrae FA, Hill DJ, St. John DJ, Ambikapathy A, Gardner, JF, & the Ballarat General Practioner Research Group. Predicting colon cancer screening behavior from health beliefs.Prev Med 1984; 13: 115–126.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Myers RE, Ross EA, Jepson C, et al. Modeling adherence to colorectal cancer screening.Prev Med 1994; 23: 142–151.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bloom J, Hayes W, Saunder F, Flatt S. Cancer awareness and secondary prevention practices in Black Americans: Implications for interventions.Fam Community Health 1987; 10: 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Evaxx Inc. Black Americans' attitudes toward cancer and cancer tests.CA 1981; 31: 212–218.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Weinstein ND. Why it won't happen to me: Perceptions of risk factors and susceptability.Health Psychol 1984; 3: 431–457.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Price JH. Perceptions of colorectal cancer in a socioeconomically disadvantaged population.J Community Health 1993; 18: 347–362.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Weinstein ND. Unrealistic optimism about future life events.J Pers Soc Psychol 1980; 39: 806–820.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Price JH, Desmond SM, Wallace M, Smith D, Stewart PW. Black Americans' perceptions of cancer: A study utilizing the Health Belief Model.J Nail Med Assoc 1988; 12: 1297–1304.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Strecher VJ, Kreuter, MW, Kobrin SC. Do cigarette smokers have unrealistic perceptions of their heart attack, cancer, and stroke risks?J Beh Med 1995; 18:45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Holt WS. Factors affecting compliance with screening sigmoidoscopy.J Fam Pract 1991; 32: 585–589.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dent OW, Bartrop R, Goulston KJ, & Chapuis PH. Participation in faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer.Soc Sci Med 1983; 17:17–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vernon SW, Acquavella JF, Yarborough CM, Hughes JI, & Thar, WE. Reasons for participation in a colorectal cancer screening program for a cohort of high risk poplypropylene workers.J Occup Med 1990; 32: 46–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rimer BK, Conaway MR, Lyna PR, et al. Cancer screening practices among women in a community health center population.Am JPrev Med (in press).

  30. Cochran W.Sampling Techniques. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Aiken LS, Fenaughty AM, West SG, Johnson JJ, Luckett TL. Perceived determinants of risk for breast cancer and the relations among objective risk, perceived risk, and screening behavior over time. Women's Health: Research on Gender, Behavior, and Policy 1995; 1: 27–50.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kreuter MW, Strecher VJ. Changing inaccurate perceptions of health risk: Results from a randomized trial.Health Psychol 1995; 14:56–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cooper GS, Yuan Z, Landefeld S, Johanson JF, Rimm AA. A national population-based study of incidence of colorectal cancer and age.Cancer 1995; 75: 775–781.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Breslow RA, Sorkin JD, Frey CM, Kessler LG. What Americans know and don't know about cancer risk and survival. Manuscript under review.

  35. Weinstein ND. Unrealistic optimism about susceptability to health problems.J Beh Med 1982; 5: 441–460.

    Google Scholar 

  36. King ES, Rimer BK, Trock B, Balshem A, Engstrom P. How valid are mammography self-reports?Am J Public Health 1990; 80:1386–1388.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. McKenna MT, Mallin K, Speers M, & Wernecke R. Agreement between patient self-reports and medical records for pap smear histories.Am J Prev Med 1992; 8:287–291.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Warnecke RB, Graham S. Characteristics of Blacks obtaining Papanicolaou smears.Cancer 1976; 37:2015–2025.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Whitman S, Lacey L, Ansell D, Chen EH, Dell J, Phillips CW. Do chart reviews and interviews provide the same information about breast and cervical cancer screening?Int J Epidemiol 1993; 22:393–397.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Myers RE, Ross EA, Wolf TA, Blashem A, Jepson C, Millner L. Behavioral interventions to increase adherence in colorectal cancer screening.Med Care 1991; 29: 1039–1050.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Myers RE, Blashem AM, Wolf TA, Ross EA, Millner L. Adherence to continuous screenings for colorectal neoplasia.Med Care 1993; 31: 508–519.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Fox SA, Stein JA. The effects of physician-patient communication on mammography utilization by different ethnic groups.Med Care 1991; 29: 1065–1082.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rimer BK: Mammography use in the U.S.: Trends and the impact of intervention.Ann Beh Med 1995; 16:317–326.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zapka JG, Hosmer D, Constanza ME, Harris DR, Stoddard A. Changes in mammography use: Economic, need, and service factors.Am J Public Health 1992; 82:1345–1351.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We thank Emma Morton and Jenny Terrenoire for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript, and David Ransohoff for his help in creating the study questionnaire. This study was supported by NIH grant 1R01-CA-59734-03.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lipkus, I.M., Rimer, B.K., Lyna, P.R. et al. Colorectal screening patterns and perceptions of risk among African-American users of a community health center. J Community Health 21, 409–427 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01702602

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01702602

Keywords

Navigation