Regular ArticlePredictors of Stage of Adoption for Colorectal Cancer Screening☆
References (37)
- et al.
Increasing mammography among women aged by use of a stage-matched, tailored intervention 40–74
Prev Med
(1998) - et al.
A 2-year self-help smoking cessation manual intervention among middle-aged Finnish men: An application of the transtheoretical model
Prev Med
(1994) - et al.
The knowledge and use of screening tests for colorectal and prostate cancer: Data from the 1987 National Health Interview Survey
Prev Med
(1990) - et al.
Modeling adherence to colorectal cancer screening
Prev Med
(1994) - et al.
Knowledge, perceptions, and mammography stage of adoption among older urban women
Am J Prev Med
(1998) - et al.
Compliance with mammography guidelines: Physician recommendation and patient adherence
Prev Med
(1999) Cancer facts and figures, 2000
(2000)- et al.
SEER cancer statistics review, 1973–1996
(1999) - et al.
Sigmoidoscopic screening in the 1990s
JAMA
(1993) - et al.
Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy
N Engl J Med
(1993)
A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer
N Engl J Med
Participation in colorectal cancer screening: A review
J Natl Cancer Inst
Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change
J Consult Clin Psychol
Beliefs about breast cancer and mammography by behavioral stage
Oncol Nurs Forum
Measuring process of change: Applications to the cessation of smoking
J Consult Clin Psychol
Measuring processes of change: Applications to the cessation of smoking
J Consult Clin Psychol
Has the use of cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening increased in the United States?
Am J Pub Health
Evidence of gender bias in patients undergoing flexible sigmoidoscopy
Cancer Detect Prev
Cited by (163)
Rapid review of factors associated with flexible sigmoidoscopy screening use
2019, Preventive MedicineCitation Excerpt :The most frequently examined psychosocial factors were perceived barriers (n = 7) (Tang et al., 2001; Power et al., 2008; Sutton et al., 2000; Wardle et al., 2005; Whitaker et al., 2011; Brenes and Paskett, 2000; Rawl et al., 2004), perceived benefits (n = 7) (Power et al., 2008; Sutton et al., 2000; Wardle et al., 2005; Whitaker et al., 2011; Janz et al., 2003; Lewis and Jensen, 1995; Senore et al., 2010), perceived risk (n = 9) (Tang et al., 2001; Power et al., 2008; Sutton et al., 2000; Wardle et al., 2005; Ko et al., 2005; Lewis and Jensen, 1995; van Dam et al., 2013; Kremers et al., 2000; Senore et al., 2010; Brenes and Paskett, 2000), attitudes towards medical tests (n = 3) (Power et al., 2008; Sutton et al., 2000; Senore et al., 2010), anticipated regret (n = 2) (Power et al., 2008; van Dam et al., 2013) and receipt of a physician recommendation to have the test (n = 2) (Lawsin et al., 2007; Taylor et al., 2003). Those most frequently positively associated with FS screening use included lower perceived barriers (n = 7/7, 100%) (Tang et al., 2001; Power et al., 2008; Sutton et al., 2000; Wardle et al., 2005; Whitaker et al., 2011; Brenes and Paskett, 2000; Rawl et al., 2004), higher perceived benefits (n = 5/7; 71.4%) (Power et al., 2008; Sutton et al., 2000; Wardle et al., 2005; Whitaker et al., 2011; Lewis and Jensen, 1995), higher perceived risk (n = 2/9; 22.2%) (Janz et al., 2003; Kremers et al., 2000), receipt of a recommendation from the clinician to have the test (n = 2/4; 50%) (Lawsin et al., 2007; Taylor et al., 2003) and positive attitudes towards medical tests (n = 2/3; 66.7%) (Power et al., 2008; Sutton et al., 2000). Other psychosocial factors found to be positively associated with FS screening use at least once, included: lower perceived test pain (n = 1/1; 100%) (Lewis and Jensen, 1995), higher consideration of future consequences (n = 1/1; 100%) (Whitaker et al., 2011), higher acculturation (n = 1/2; 50%) (Tang et al., 2001), higher knowledge of FS screening (n = 1/1; 100%) (van Dam et al., 2013), receiving a recommendation to have the test from a family member (n = 1/1; 100%) (Walsh et al., 2004), having previously thought about getting the test done (n = 1/1; 100%) (Walsh et al., 2004) and positive attitudes towards CRC screening tests (n = 1/1; 100%) (van Dam et al., 2013).
The cost-effectiveness of training US primary care physicians to conduct colorectal cancer screening in family medicine residency programs
2016, Preventive MedicineCitation Excerpt :This assumption is indirectly supported by a number of studies that have demonstrated that PCP-conducted screenings result in higher compliance as a result of PCPs' ability to better educate their patients, to have already established trust with the patient, and to leverage electronic health records for timely prompting (Levy et al., 2006; Lewis et al., 2000; O'Malley et al., 2004; Rogge et al., 1994; Stone et al., 2002; Wilkins et al., 2009). Lack of physician recommendation for CRC screening has been cited as a major contributor to low CRC screening compliance (Brenes and Paskett, 2000; Lewis and Jensen, 1996). We contend that PCPs who are able to perform FS or colonoscopy would be generally more aware of recommended screening protocols and would be more likely to recommend CRC screening to their patients.
Socio-psychological factors in the Expanded Health Belief Model and subsequent colorectal cancer screening
2015, Patient Education and CounselingImplementation intentions and colorectal screening: A randomized trial in safety-net clinics
2014, American Journal of Preventive MedicineAdapting Champion's Breast Cancer Fear Scale to colorectal cancer: Psychometric testing in a sample of older Chinese adults
2014, European Journal of Oncology NursingCitation Excerpt :Alternatively, it is also possibly due to the heterogeneity in both conceptual and operational definitions of the construct in these studies. Out of the seven studies, three studies used one single item to assess worry of getting CRC on a 3-point or 4-point Likert scale (Brenes and Paskett, 2000; Costanza et al., 2005; Sutton et al., 2000), one study use nine items to assess nine different aspects of fear, one item for each aspect of fear being measured (Bynum et al., 2012), one study used four items to assess fear of CRC in four different situations (Kremers et al., 2000), while the remaining two did not provide information on how the fear construct was operationalized (Kelly and Shank, 1992; Myers et al., 2007). Apparently, the present instruments for measuring fear of colorectal cancer may not be adequate when assessing the construct.
- ☆
Support for this study was provided by NIH Grant CA57016 and NIH/NIA Training Grant T32AG00182.
- 2
To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed at Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1063. Fax: (336) 716-6312. E-mail: [email protected].