Appendix Table 1.

Health and Social Outcomes by Poverty Status and Intervention Assignment (Model 1) with P Values and the P Values Adjusted for False Discovery Rates

	Not Below the Federal Poverty Line (n = 268)						Below the Federal Poverty Line (n = 750)
	RS	CEP	CEP vs. RS, Test (95% CI)	P	P_FDR	ES	RS	CEP	CEP vs. RS, Test (95% CI)	P	P_FDR	ES
Poor MHQOL (%)			OR						OR
6-Month follow-up	51.4 (4.4)	37.0 (4.7)	0.5 (0.3–1.1)	.084	.554	0.29	51.6 (3.0)	46.5 (2.5)	0.8 (0.6–1.1)	.175	.394	0.10
12-Month follow-up	45.3 (4.9)	42.4 (5.8)	0.9 (0.5–1.6)	.689	.969	0.06	52.2 (3.0)	45.7 (3.2)	0.8 (0.6–1.1)	.107	.250	0.13
PHQ-8 standard score (mean)			Difference						Difference
6-Month follow-up	12.1 (0.8)	11.8 (0.7)	−0.2 (−2.6, 2.2)	.840	.840	0.04	13.1 (0.5)	12.7 (0.5)	−0.4 (−2.3, 1.4)	.596	.596	0.06
12-Month follow-up	10.9 (0.9)	10.9 (0.8)	0.0 (−2.2, 2.3)	.969	.969	0.00	12.4 (0.4)	12.1 (0.4)	−0.3 (−1.5, 0.9)	.605	.623	0.04
Mental wellness (%)			OR						OR
6-Month follow-up	40.1 (4.9)	49.0 (6.5)	1.5 (0.6–3.4)	.328	.766	0.18	31.6 (3.0)	44.6 (2.6)	1.8 (1.2–2.7)	.004	.027	0.27
12-Month follow-up	54.7 (5.7)	51.0 (4.3)	0.9 (0.5–1.6)	.619	.969	0.07	44.8 (3.6)	48.2 (3.4)	1.2 (0.7–1.8)	.509	.623	0.07
Good physical health (%)
6-Month follow-up	78.1 (4.3)	80.2 (3.9)	1.2 (0.5–2.5)	.712	.840	0.05	73.5 (2.8)	76.4 (2.2)	1.2 (0.8–1.7)	.360	.420	0.07
12-Month follow-up	78.0 (4.2)	77.4 (3.8)	1.0 (0.5–1.9)	.906	.969	0.01	69.6 (3.5)	78.4 (2.8)	1.6 (1.1–2.4)	.019	.115	0.20
Homeless/risk (%)
6-Month follow-up	38.1 (6.6)	27.9 (4.8)	0.6 (0.3–1.2)	.158	.554	0.22	40.3 (3.4)	30.3 (3.1)	0.6 (0.4–1.0)	.050	.176	0.21
12-Month follow-up	25.7 (4.1)	31.0 (5.3)	1.3 (0.7–2.5)	.400	.969	0.12	33.8 (3.6)	35.7 (3.5)	1.1 (0.8–1.6)	.623	.623	0.04
Worried about cost (%)
6-Month follow-up	29.5 (4.5)	32.2 (5.8)	1.1 (0.5–2.7)	.755	.840	0.06	33.0 (2.7)	29.6 (2.6)	0.9 (0.6–1.2)	.334	.420	0.07
12-Month follow-up	28.7 (4.8)	30.1 (4.6)	1.1 (0.6–2.0)	.820	.969	0.03	32.6 (2.6)	24.0 (3.2)	0.6 (0.4–1.0)	.033	.115	0.19
Life difficulties total score out of 15 (mean)			Difference						Difference
6-Month follow-up	3.0 (0.3)	2.7 (0.3)	−0.3 (−1.0, 0.5)	.491	.840	0.12	3.0 (0.2)	2.7 (0.1)	−0.3 (−0.7, 0.2)	.225	.394	0.12
12-Month follow-up	2.6 (0.2)	2.4 (0.2)	−0.2 (−0.9, 0.4)	.499	.969	0.09	2.8 (0.2)	2.6 (0.2)	−0.2 (−0.5, 0.2)	.376	.623	0.09

Data are estimate (standard error) unless otherwise indicated.
Intervention–by–poverty status interaction models were used multiple imputed data, were weighted for eligible sample for enrollment, and accounted for the design effect of the cluster randomization. A linear regression model was used for continuous variables (presented as the between-group difference) and a logistic regression model was used for binary variables (presented as odds ratio [OR]), adjusted for baseline status of the dependent variable, age, education, race/ethnicity, 12-month depressive disorder, and community. No significant interactions of intervention and poverty status were found for any outcome variables.
CEP, Community Engagement and Planning; CI, confidence interval; ES, standardized effect size; MHQOL, mental health quality of life; P_FDR, P value adjusted for false discovery rate; PHQ-8, 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire; RS, Resources for Services.