Appendix Table 3.

Health and Social Outcomes by Intervention Assignment Among Mutually Exclusive Client Subgroups Below the Federal Poverty Line (Model 2) with P Values and the P Values Adjusted for False Discovery Rates

Involved in the Justice System (n = 158)Homeless, Not Involved in the Justice System (n = 298)Other Poor (n = 294)
RSCEPCEP vs. RS, Test (95% CI)PPFDRESRSCEPCEP vs. RS, Test (95% CI)PPFDRESRSCEPCEP vs. RS, Test (95% CI)PPFDRES
Poor MHQOL (%)OROROR
    6-Month follow-up50.1 (5.3)38.0 (5.7)0.6 (0.3–1.2).144.2520.2455.6 (5.8)49.4 (4.8)0.8 (0.4–1.5).424.5940.1247.9 (4.4)47.6 (3.7)1.0 (0.6–1.5).965.9770.00
    12-Month follow-up50.6 (8.0)40.9 (7.9)0.7 (0.3–1.8).392.8460.1955.3 (4.4)48.1 (4.6)0.7 (0.5–1.2).223.5190.1450.2 (4.8)45.8 (5.4)0.8 (0.5–1.4).501.9110.09
PHQ-8 standard score (mean)DifferenceDifferenceDifference
    6-Month follow-up13.0 (1.0)13.0 (0.9)0.0 (−2.9, 2.9).997.9970.0013.7 (0.6)12.8 (0.7)−0.9 (−2.7, 1.0).347.5940.1312.5 (0.8)12.5 (0.7)0.0 (−2.5, 2.4).977.9770.00
    12-Month follow-up11.8 (0.9)11.5 (1.2)−0.3 (−2.6, 2.1).809.8830.0412.7 (0.6)12.1 (0.6)−0.6 (−2.2, 1.0).434.5550.0912.5 (0.8)12.6 (0.6)0.0 (−1.9, 1.9).978.9780.00
Mental wellness (%)OROROR
    6-Month follow-up31.0 (6.4)50.8 (6.7)2.5 (0.9–6.9).080.1870.4133.4 (4.7)40.3 (4.2)1.4 (0.7–2.7).340.5940.1429.6 (4.1)45.7 (4.3)2.1 (1.2–3.7).009.0620.33
    12-Month follow-up51.8 (8.3)58.4 (6.8)1.3 (0.4–4.1).589.8460.1340.1 (5.0)48.9 (6.1)1.5 (0.7–3.0).304.5310.1846.1 (5.5)43.0 (4.5)0.9 (0.5–1.6).651.9110.06
Good physical health (%)
    6-Month follow-up74.2 (5.5)79.8 (5.5)1.4 (0.6–3.5).459.6430.1373.5 (3.1)74.0 (4.8)1.0 (0.6–1.8).9060.9170.0172.9 (4.4)76.8 (3.9)1.2 (0.6–2.4).499.9770.09
    12-Month follow-up73.9 (5.4)81.8 (7.1)1.6 (0.5–4.9).348.8460.1966.5 (4.0)78.3 (4.0)1.9 (1.0–3.4).0420.1960.2770.9 (5.3)77.0 (3.6)1.4 (0.8–2.5).263.9110.14
Homeless/risk (%)
    6-Month follow-up41.9 (7.3)20.6 (6.4)0.4 (0.1–0.9).036.1260.4655.1 (4.5)46.1 (5.9)0.7 (0.4–1.3).2670.5940.1824.5 (4.6)17.9 (3.3)0.7 (0.4–1.3).213.7460.16
    12-Month follow-up32.2 (8.6)36.7 (6.6)1.2 (0.5–2.8).588.8460.1045.2 (4.7)48.0 (4.9)1.1 (0.7–1.9).6430.6430.0623.1 (5.1)21.7 (4.6)0.9 (0.4–2.1).836.9760.03
Worried about cost (%)
    6-Month follow-up34.9 (6.5)32.9 (5.4)0.9 (0.4–1.9).807.9420.0435.7 (4.4)30.7 (4.2)0.8 (0.5–1.4).4020.5940.1129.0 (4.6)27.5 (4.1)0.9 (0.6–1.6).769.9770.03
    12-Month follow-up30.8 (5.6)26.4 (7.7)0.8 (0.3–2.0).604.8460.1037.3 (4.3)23.3 (4.9)0.5 (0.2–1.0).0560.1960.3128.3 (4.8)23.7 (3.7)0.8 (0.4–1.4).418.9110.11
Life difficulties total score out of 15 (mean)DifferenceDifferenceDifference
    6-Month follow-up2.9 (0.4)1.9 (0.3)−1.1 (−1.9, −0.2).017.1200.443.3 (0.3)3.3 (0.3)0.0 (−0.8, 0.7).9170.9170.012.6 (0.3)2.6 (0.2)−0.1 (−0.7, 0.5).808.9770.03
    12-Month follow-up2.5 (0.4)2.6 (0.3)0.1 (−1.3, 1.5).883.8830.043.0 (0.2)2.7 (0.3)−0.2 (−0.9, 0.4).4760.5550.102.7 (0.3)2.5 (0.3)−0.2 (−1, 0.6).547.9110.12
  • Data are estimate (standard error) unless otherwise indicated.

  • Intervention–by–vulnerable subgroup interaction models were used multiple imputed data, were weighted for eligible sample for enrollment, and accounted for the design effect of the cluster randomization. A linear regression model was used for continuous variables (presented as between-group differences) and a logistic regression model for binary variables (presented as odds ratio [OR]), adjusted for baseline status of the dependent variable, age, education, race/ethnicity, 12-month depressive disorder, and community. No significant interactions of intervention and poverty status were found for any outcome variables.

  • CEP, Community Engagement and Planning; CI, confidence interval; ES, standardized effect size; MHQOL, mental health quality of life; PFDR, P value adjusted for false discovery rate; PHQ-8, 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire; RS, Resources for Services.