Table 3. Mean Difference in Consumer Assessment of Health Care Providers and Systems Child Development and Child Prevention Composite Measures, By Provider and Patient Characteristics Stratified By Practice Type

Covariates	Outcome 1: CAHPS Composite Child Development		Outcome 2: CAHPS Composite Child Prevention
Covariates	Mean Difference in Percentage Responding Yes^*	95% Confidence Interval	Mean Difference in Percentage Responding Yes	95% Confidence Interval
Pediatrics only
PCMH recognition	7.71	4.02 to 11.41	7.15	3.35 to 10.96
Patient's age	−1.13	−1.50 to −0.76	−0.45	−0.83 to −0.08
Female patient (yes = 1, no = 0)	−3.17	−6.76 to 0.42	−1.24	−4.90 to 2.42
Parent is a college graduate (yes/no)	2.38	−1.28 to 6.04	6.18	2.45 to 9.92
Patient's health (excellent = 1, poor = 5)	−1.62	−4.34 to 1.11	−2.48	−5.26 to 0.30
Family medicine only
PCMH recognition	−7.35	−0.117 to −0.030	−11.04	−15.28 to −6.80
Patient's age	−1.74	−0.021 to −0.014	−0.77	−1.11 to −0.43
Female patient (yes/no)	−1.31	−0.049 to 0.023	−0.84	−4.41 to 2.74
Parent college graduate (yes/no)	4.13	0.005 to 0.078	3.37	−0.27 to 7.02
Patient's health (excellent = 1, poor = 5)	−1.48	−0.041 to 0.011	−3.37	−5.97 to −0.77

↵* The β coefficient from linear mixed model regression output × 100 results in the mean difference in the composite scores as a percentage of a 1-unit change in each predictor variable, adjusting for all other variables in the model. A positive value indicates that respondents answered yes to more questions as the value of the predictor increased.
CAHPS, Consumer Assessment of Health Care Providers and Systems; PCMH, patient-centered medical home.