Study | Patient Satisfaction | Clinician Satisfaction | Productivity | Revenue | Time/ Efficiency | Patient–Clinician Interaction |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arya et al25 | — | — | RVUs per hour increased Patients per hour increased | — | Statistically significant difference in turnaround time to discharge not detected | — |
Koshy et al26 | Statistically significant difference not detected | Physician satisfaction increased with scribe | — | — | — | — |
Bank et al27 | Statistically significant difference not detected | — | Patients per hour increased Total wRVUs per hour increased | Additional revenue was generated as a function of increased patient volume | Direct patient contact time was lower for scribe visits, but amount of patient interaction without the computer was greater | Single-rater observation scored scribe visits as better in patient–provider interaction |
Bastani et al28 | Statistically significant difference between time periods before CPOE and after scribe not detected Time periods before CPOE and after scribe were perceived more favorably than the time period after CPOE/before scribe | — | — | — | Door-to-room time remained consistent across all 3 waves Door-to-doctor time increased after CPOE/before scribe but returned back to pre-CPOE levels in the after-scribe time period Doctor-to-admit disposition time decreased after scribe when compared with time periods before CPOE and after CPOE/before scribe | — |
Allen et al29 | — | Physician satisfaction increased with scribe | Statistically significant difference in the number of patients per day not detected Proportion of admitted patients increased | — | Admitted patients: Door-to-triage, door-to-room, door-to-disposition, and clinician-to-disposition times decreased Door-to-exit and disposition-to-exit times increased Discharged patients: Door-to-disposition, door-to-exit, clinician-to-disposition, and disposition-to-exit times decreased | — |
CPOE, computerized physician order entry; RVU, relative value unit; wRVU, work relative value unit.