Table 2.

Comparison of Urine Culture Results Across Three Patient Groups

CharacteristicUncomplicated UTI (n = 68)Uncomplicated Elders (n = 59)Complicated Elders (n = 47)
N (%)95% CIN (%)95% CIN (%)95% CI
UC&S testing ordered52 (76)66–87*44 (75)83–86*37 (79)67–90*
Mixed flora/contamination present in urine culturen = 52n = 44n = 37
    Yes11 (21)12 (27)9 (24)
    No38 (73)27 (61)26 (70)
    No growth3 (6)5 (11)2 (5)
Type of pathogens grownn = 38n = 27n = 26
    E. coli35 (92)79–9822 (81)62–9414 (54)33–73
    E. coli only321914
    E. coli and other bacteria330
    Other bacteria only3 (8)2–215 (19)6–3812 (46)27–67
E. coli sensitivity to TMP/SMX33 (94) (n = 35)81–99*19 (86) (n = 22)65–97*12 (86) (n = 14)57–98*
  • * 95% CI show the proportion of patients who had urine culture and sensitivity testing ordered that were calculated using normal theory methods; all other 95% CIs were calculated using an exact method of obtaining a confidence interval for a binomial parameter.

  • UTI, urinary tract infection; UC&S, of urine culture and sensitivity; TMP/SMX, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.