In what settings is interpersonal continuity of care valued? | 8 | Lewis et al. | 2000 | Quantitative | 314 | Eastern US |
| | Pereira et al. | 2003 | Quantitative | 1171 | New England |
| | Roberge et al. | 2001 | Qualitative | 23 | Montreal |
| | Baker | 1996 | Quantitative | 7273 | Britain |
| | Roland et al. | 1986 | Quantitative | 50 | Britain |
| | Salisbury et al. | 2002 | Quantitative | 6229 | Britain |
| | Perron et al. | 2004 | Qualitative | 26 | Switzerland |
| | Flocke et al. | 2002 | Quantitative | 2881 | Ohio |
Who values continuity? | 12 | Schers et al. | 2002 | Quantitative | 644 | The Netherlands |
| | Pereira et al. | 2003 | Quantitative | 1171 | New England |
| | Brown et al. | 1997 | Qualitative | 29 | Canada |
| | Nutting et al. | 2003 | Quantitative | 3283 | Ohio |
| | Tarrant et al. | 2003 | Qualitative | 40 | England |
| | Kearley et al. | 2001 | Quantitative | 996 | England |
| | Mainous et al. | 2004 | Quantitative | 4454 | Ohio |
| | Mainous et al. | 2001 | Quantitative | 1068 | UK/US |
| | Brown et al. | 1997 | Qualitative | 42 | Canada |
| | Canady et al. | 1997 | Quantitative | 101 | Iowa |
| | Freeman et al. | 1993 | Quantitative | 111 | England |
| | Love et al. | 1999 | Quantitative | 466 | Kentucky |
For what medical situations is interpersonal continuity of care valued? | 19 | Bjorkman et al. | 1995 | Qualitative | 94 | Sweden |
| | Nair et al. | 2005 | Qualitative | 46 | Ontario |
| | Schers et al. | 2002 | Quantitative | 644 | The Netherlands |
| | Lewis et al. | 2000 | Quantitative | 314 | Eastern US |
| | Pereira et al. | 2003 | Quantitative | 1171 | New England |
| | Nutting et al. | 2003 | Quantitative | 3283 | Ohio |
| | Tarrant et al. | 2003 | Qualitative | 40 | England |
| | Kearley et al. | 2001 | Quantitative | 996 | England |
| | Canady et al. | 1997 | Quantitative | 101 | Iowa |
| | Freeman et al. | 1993 | Quantitative | 111 | England |
| | Love et al. | 1999 | Quantitative | 466 | Kentucky |
| | Kibbe et al. | 1993 | Quantitative | 229 | North Carolina |
| | Temmink et al. | 2000 | Quantitative | 128 | The Netherlands |
| | Stoddart et al. | 2003 | Quantitative | 724 | England |
| | Infante et al. | 2004 | Qualitative | 76 | Australia |
| | Ware et al. | 2004 | Qualitative | 51 | Massachusetts |
| | Ware et al. | 1999 | Qualitative | 16 | Boston, MA |
| | Schers et al. | 2004 | Mixed | 875 | The Netherlands |
| | Christakis et al. | 2004 | Quantitative | 759 | Seattle, WA |
Why is interpersonal continuity valued? | 16 | Gabel et al. | 1993 | Qualitative | 60 | Ohio |
| | Nair et al. | 2005 | Qualitative | 46 | Ontario |
| | Schers et al. | 2002 | Quantitative | 644 | The Netherlands |
| | Roberge et al. | 2001 | Qualitative | 23 | Montreal |
| | Perron et al. | 2004 | Qualitative | 26 | Switzerland |
| | Brown et al. | 1997 | Qualitative | 29 | Canada |
| | Tarrant et al. | 2003 | Qualitative | 40 | England |
| | Mainous et al. | 2001 | Quantitative | 1068 | UK/US |
| | Brown et al. | 1997 | Qualitative | 42 | Canada |
| | Infante et al. | 2004 | Qualitative | 76 | Australia |
| | Lings et al. | 2003 | Qualitative | 34 | New York |
| | Liaw et al. | 1992 | Qualitative | 93 | Australia |
| | Pooley et al. | 2001 | Qualitative | 47 | England |
| | O’ Malley et al. | 2000 | Qualitative | 24 | Washington DC |
| | Schers et al. | 2005 | Quantitative | 2152 | The Netherlands |
| | Torke et al. | 2004 | Qualitative | 26 | Atlanta, GA |