Table 4.

Mean Scores, Number of un-Ratable Domains, Number of Domains Requiring Consensus and Arbitration*

PRECIS-2 DomainMean Score* (± SD)Number of Studies with Domains Not RatableNumber of Studies Where Scoring Required a Consensus between an Explanatory (<3) or Pragmatic (>3) or If un-RatableNumber of Studies Where Scoring Required Arbitration by a Third Reviewer (EAH)
Eligibility criteria2.91 (±0.83)0/12 (0%)2/12 (17%)1/12 (8%)
Recruitment path2.54 (±0.69)0/12 (0%)1/12 (8%)0/12 (0%)
Setting2.50 (±0.97)1/12 (8%)2/12 (17%)0/11 (0%)
Organization2.86 (±0.69)4/12 (33%)4/12 (33%)0/12 (0%)
Flexibility (staff)2.62 (±0.92)3/12 (25%)4/12 (33%)2/12 (17%)
Flexibility (adherence)3.18 (±0.40)0/12 (0%)4/12 (33%)0/12 (0%)
Follow-up2.73 (±0.65)1/12 (8%)3/12 (25%)1/12 (8%)
Primary outcome3.27 (±0.79)0/12 (0%)4/12 (33%)0/12 (0%)
Analysis3.54 (±0.93)0/12 (0%)1/12 (8%)1/12 (8%)
  • Abbreviation: PRECIS, PRagmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary.

  • *Mean ratings were calculated by averaging the domain score for each randomized controlled trial. If a domain was un-ratable the score was averaged over the number of studies with available rating data.

  • *PRECIS-2 ratings are presented as mean (±standard deviation).

  • Consensus was reached between two primary raters (SZ and MM).