Table 4.

Explaining Hypertension Control in Small Virginia Practices

(1)(2)
Average Effects across
Practice Types
BP Control
Testing for Practice Type Variation in Effects of HVH Intervention
BP Control
Beta
(95% CI)
Beta
(95% CI)
Intensive0.65 (−0.46, 1.75)0.79 (−1.39, 2.97)
Maintenance−0.75* (−1.41, −0.09)−0.79 (−2.23, 0.65)
Intensive * FQHC0.61 (−2.32, 3.54)
Maintenance * FQHC−1.94* (−3.47, −0.41)
Intensive * System−0.47 (−3.52, 2.58)
Maintenance * System0.53 (−1.04, 2.09)
CPCQ−0.09 (−0.25, 0.07)
AR−8.19 (−24.87, 8.49)
Kickoff5.76** (1.73, 9.80)5.49** (1.50, 9.47)
Cohort 20.54 (−3.82, 4.90)0.17 (−4.42, 4.76)
Cohort 36.15* (1.10, 11.21)6.04* (0.96, 11.12)
R20.450.44
N1,0331,033
  • Abbreviations: CPCQ, Change process capability questionnaire; AR, Adaptive reserve; FQHC, Federally qualified health center; HVH, Heart of Virginia Healthcare; CI, confidence interval; BP, blood pressure.

  • *P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .001.

  • Notes: Estimates from a linear regression controlling for practice ownership type, participation in an Accountable Care Organization, payer mix, practice size, urban location, and measurement period. The CPCQ ranges from −28 to 28. The AR ranges from 0 to 1.