Table 1.

Olfactory Psychophysical Clinic-Based Assessments

InstrumentFunction assessedSubstances usedProtocolAdvantagesDisadvantages
Brief or Cross-Cultural Smell Identification Test83IdentificationBanana, chocolate, cinnamon*, gasoline, lemon, onion, paint thinner, pineapple, rose, soap, smoke, turpentineDerived from the UPSIT. Using microencapsulated odorants, subjects progress through 12-item multiple-choice test for 12 odorsRequires less time, cost efficient
Can be self-administered
Less thorough evaluation
Pocket Smell Test69IdentificationLemon, lilac, smokeDerived from the UPSIT. Using microencapsulated strips, subjects progress through 3-item multiple-choice test for 3 odors.Requires less time, cost efficient
Can be self-administered
Less thorough evaluation
Q-Sticks84IdentificationCloves*, coffee, roseUsing felt-tip pens with odorants, subjects progress through 3-item multiple-choice test for 3 odors.Can be self-administeredLess thorough evaluation
Quick Smell Identification Test85IdentificationChocolate, banana, smokeUsing microencapsulated odorant strips, subjects progress through 3-item multiple-choice test for 3 odors.Can be self-administeredLess thorough evaluation
University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test86IdentificationBanana, bubble gum, cedar, cheddar cheese, cherry, chocolate, cinnamon*, cloves*, coconut, dill pickle, fruit punch, gasoline, gingerbread, grape, grass, leather, lemon, lilac, lime, licorice, menthol*, mint, motor oil, natural gas, onion, orange, peach, peanut, pine, pineapple, pizza, root bear, rose, smoke, soap, strawberry, thinner, turpentine, watermelon, wintergreen*Using scratch and sniff scented strips, subjects progress through 40-item multiple-choice test for 40 odors.High sensitivity and reliability; extensive normative data
Can be self-administered
More time intensive
Snap & Sniff Threshold Test87ThresholdPEA, dilutions ranging from 10−2 (strongest) to 10−9 (weakest) volume/volume concentrationsThe kit contains 20 smell “wands.” Five contain no smell, while the other 15 contain PEA dilutions. Examiners plan the wand under subjects' noses and briefly present the dilution scent. A single staircase forced-choice paradigm is recommended.Time efficient, rapid assessment of general olfactory function
Newer test but recently validated
Less thorough evaluation – only evaluates detection threshold
Alcohol Threshold Test88ThresholdEthyl alcohol (10%, 25%, 50%, 70%, 96%)Examiners place 100 mL bottles with saline and with varying concentrations of ethyl alcohol under subjects' noses. The threshold scores of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 correspond to the weakest detectable alcohol concentrations of 10%, 25%, 50%, 70%, and 96%, respectively. The threshold score of 6 corresponds to participants not detecting 96% alcohol.Time efficient, rapid assessment of general olfactory functionLess thorough evaluation
Requires clinician administration
Smell Threshold Test89ThresholdPolypropylene, PEAExaminers place 120 mL polypropylene squeeze bottles with mineral oil and varying concentrations of PEA in mineral oil under subjects' noses. The threshold is the mean of the last 4 of 7 staircase reversals.Less thorough evaluation
Requires clinician administration
“Sniffin' Sticks”90Identification, discrimination, thresholdApple, anise seed, banana, cinnamon*cloves*, coffee, fish, garlic*, lemon, licorice, orange, peppermint*, pineapple, rose, shoe leather, turpentine, n-butanolUsing felt-tip pens with odorants, subjects progress through 16-item multiple-choice test of 16 odors for identification, triple forced choice for 16 pairs of odorants for discrimination, and the presentation of n-butanol in varying concentrations for threshold. Threshold was calculated as the mean of the last 4 of 7 staircase reversals.Enables testing of three smell domainsCan be self- or clinician-administeredMore time intensive
  • Abbreviations: PEA, phenyl ethyl alcohol; UPSIT, University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test.

  • * Indicates potential olfaction and chemesthesis overlap.