Table 3.

Physician Ratings for POEMs 1, 2, 3, and 4

Number of Physicians Endorsing Item (%)
POEM 1POEM 2POEM 3POEM 4
IAM Questionn = 1293n = 1351n = 1308n = 1243
Q1.I disagree with the content of this information. 19 (1.5)7 (0.5)15 (1.15)4 (0.3)
This information is potentially harmful.24 (1.9)4 (0.3)13 (1.0)0
Q3.Will you use this information for a specific patient?139 (10.8)214 (15.8)156 (11.9)79 (6.4)
Answering ‘Yes’ to Q3 enables the following sub-items:n = 139n = 214n = 156n = 79
As a result of this information I will manage this patient differently.22 (15.8)19 (8.9)19 (12.2)6 (7.6)
I had several options for this patient, and I will use this information to justify a choice.33 (23.7)50 (23.4)44 (28.2)19 (24.1)
I thought I knew what to do, and I used this information to be more certain about the management of this patient.18 (12.9)33 (15.4)24 (15.4)16 (20.3)
I used this information to better understand a particular issue related to this patient.52 (37.4)61 (28.5)49 (31.4)34 (43.0)
I will use this information in a discussion with this patient, or with other health professionals about this patient.78 (56.1)134 (62.6)99 (63.5)43 (54.4)
I will use this information to persuade this patient, or to persuade other health professionals to make a change for this patient.21 (15.1)16 (7.5)14 (9.0)8 (10.1)
Q4. For this patient, do you expect any health benefits as a result of applying this information?121 (87.1)186 (86.9)129 (82.7)61 (77.2)
Answering ‘Yes’ to Q4 enables the following sub-item:n = 121n = 186n = 129n = 61
This information will help to avoid unnecessary or inappropriate treatment, diagnostic procedures, preventative interventions or a referral, for this patient.105 (86.8)163 (87.6)122 (94.6)45 (73.8)
  • POEM, Patient-Oriented Evidence that Matters.