Logistic Regression Estimates of Perceived Teamwork Efficiency on Burnout, Stratified by Team Configuration
| Team Configuration* | Perceived Teamwork Efficiency | Burnout | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Odds Ratio | 95% CI | ||
| MA/nurse only† | Poor | Reference | |
| Good | 1.29 | 0.53–3.13 | |
| Optimal | 0.58 | 0.20–1.65 | |
| MA/nurse + NP/PA or specialist‡ | Poor | Reference | |
| Good | 0.86 | 0.48–1.53 | |
| Optimal | 0.54§ | 0.27–1.09 | |
| MA/nurse + NP/PA and specialist‖ | Poor | Reference | |
| Good | 0.75 | 0.40–1.40 | |
| Optimal | 0.40§ | 0.18–0.88 | |
↵* For all team configurations, satisfaction with practice, having control over workload, and having professional values aligned with practice management were significantly associated with reduced odds of burnout.
↵† For teams with MA/nurse only, other significant contributing factors of burnout were being female and practicing in highly socially deprived counties.
↵‡ For teams with MA/nurse + NP/PA or specialist, no other factors were significantly associated with increased odds of burnout.
↵§ P < .05.
↵‖ For teams with MA/nurse + NP/PA and specialist, other significant contributing factors of burnout were being female, MD, and practicing in independently owned practices.
MA, medical assistant; NP, nurse practitioner; PA, physician assistant; CI, confidence interval.