Spearman's Correlation Coefficients of Mini Z Items in the Garden Practice Transformation Network Maryland Clinicians and Staff (n = 166)
| Job Satisfaction | Control | Time | Pace* | Values | Team | EHR at Home | EHR Use | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burnout | 0.5922 <0.0001 | −0.4935 <0.0001 | −0.4248 <0.0001 | −0.3224 <0.0001 | −0.3266 <0.0001 | −0.3938 <0.0001 | −0.0707 0.3654 | −0.1122 0.1503 |
| Job satisfaction | 1.000 | 0.4760 <0.0001 | 0.3914 <0.0001 | 0.2410 0.0018 | 0.4954 <0.0001 | 0.4721 <0.0001 | 0.0301 0.7004 | 0.2277 0.0032 |
| Control | 1.000 | 0.6363 <0.0001 | 0.2118 0.0062 | 0.4428 <0.0001 | 0.4592 <0.0001 | 0.1823 0.0187 | 0.3048 <0.0001 | |
| Time | 1.000 | 0.08386 0.2827 | 0.32118 <0.0001 | 0.36644 <0.0001 | 0.28568 0.0002 | 0.19625 0.0113 | ||
| Pace* | 1.000 | 0.173 0.0259 | 0.201 0.0093 | −0.172 0.0263 | −0.190 0.0142 | |||
| Value | 1.000 | 0.5723 <0.0001 | −0.0001 0.9987 | 0.1940 0.0122 | ||||
| Team | 1.000 | −0.0373 0.6334 | 0.1692 0.0293 | |||||
| EHR at home | 1.000 | 0.2273 0.0032 |
Spearman's correlation coefficients and corresponding P values are shown. A 5-item burnout scale was coded so that the lowest score corresponded to the lowest burnout level (enjoyed work), and highest score corresponded to the highest level of burnout. The burnout drivers were coded so that score 1 corresponded to the lowest level of positive experience and score 5 corresponded to the highest level of positive experience, and recoded if necessary*. Mini Z burnout driver questions were formulated as followed: “Job satisfaction”— “Overall, I am satisfied with my current job, Strongly Disagree…Strongly Agree”; “Control”—“My control over workload is Poor…Optimal”; “Time”—“Sufficiency of time for documentation is Poor…Optimal”; “Pace”—“Which number best describes the atmosphere in your primary work area? Calm…Hectic/Chaotic”; “Values”—“My professional values are well aligned with those in my department leaders, Strongly Disagree…Strongly Agree”; “Team”—“The degree to which my care team works efficiently together is Poor…Optimal”; “EHR at home”—“The amount of time I spend on the electronic medical records (EHR) at home is Excessive…Optimal/None”; “EHR use”—“My proficiency with EHR use is Poor…Optimal.”
↵* Item “Pace” was reverse coded.