Appendix Table 1.

Total Visit Rates, New-Patient Visit Rates, and Total Alternative Encounters Over Study Time Periods (Pre-APM, Pre-ACA; Post-APM, Pre-ACA; Post-APM Post-ACA)

OutcomeEncounters/1000 Patients Per Month*Relative Rates
Pre-APMPost-APMPost-ACAPost-APM vs Pre-APMPost-ACA vs Post-APM
Total encounters
    APM clinics651.02 (550.57, 769.79)672.82 (544.77, 830.98)716.07 (565.29, 907.07)1.03 (0.98, 1.09)1.06 (0.98, 1.15)
    Non-APM comparison clinics435.10 (371.15, 510.07)463.21 (409.76, 523.62)480.33 (427.15, 540.12)1.07 (0.99, 1.13)1.04 (0.96, 1.12)
    APM vs non-APM comparison relative rate1.50 (1.17, 1.92)1.45 (1.11, 1.90)1.49 (1.12, 1.99)0.97 (0.89, 1.05)1.03 (0.92, 1.15)
New patient visits
    APM clinics6.52 (4.68, 9.10)5.47 (3.94, 7.60)7.30 (5.75, 9.27)0.84 (0.60, 1.16)1.34 (0.86, 2.08)
    Non-APM comparison clinics4.94 (3.84, 6.36)5.12 (3.55, 7.40)5.35 (3.71, 7.72)1.04 (0.80, 1.35)1.04 (0.72, 1.52)
    APM vs non-APM comparison relative rate1.32 (0.87, 2.01)1.07 (0.64, 1.77)1.36 (0.88, 2.11)0.81 (0.53, 1.23)1.28 (0.71, 2.29)
Alternative encounters
    APM clinics801.53 (707.54, 908.01)872.66 (748.41, 1017.53)950.09 (779.62,1157.82)1.09 (1.04, 1.14)1.09 (0.99, 1.19)
    Non-APM comparison clinics657.28 (585.48, 737.88)723.15 (642.99, 813.30)769.75 (662.70, 894.10)1.10 (1.04, 1.17)1.06 (0.98, 1.16)
    APM vs Non-APM comparison relative rate1.22 (1.02, 1.46)1.21 (0.98, 1.48)1.23 (0.96, 1.59)0.99 (0.92, 1.07)1.02 (0.90, 1.16)
  • ACA, Affordable Care Act; APM, Alternative Payment Methodology.

  • Total alternative encounters included hospice visits, home health visits, nurse visits, telemedicine, telephone and email consultations, lab and imaging only visits, and visits with a pharmacist.

  • * Rates were determined from Poisson regression models of APM status*month, utilizing a robust sandwich estimator to account for correlations within clinics and were adjusted for percent Hispanic, percent Medicaid insurance and percent of panel in a high needs age group.

  • There was a positive trend in outcome within the pre-period in both APM and Comparison groups; differences in pre-period trend were not statistically significant.

  • There were no statistically significant trends in outcomes during the pre-period.