Association between Practice Location Rurality and Low Value Care Spending of Attributed Medicare Patients Across Specialty
Characteristic | Panel A: OLS Estimates | Panel B: Logit Odds Ratio Estimates | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Coefficient | SE | OR | SE | |
Physician Characteristics | ||||
Allopath | −1.617‡ | 0.4605 | 0.652† | 0.0875 |
Female | −0.566 | 0.4528 | 1.014 | 0.1500 |
Non-US Medical Graduate | −0.216 | 0.4158 | 0.985 | 0.1138 |
Patient Size | ||||
<50 | −4.131‡ | 0.5712 | 0.322‡ | 0.0525 |
50 to 149 | −2.779‡ | 0.4675 | 0.416‡ | 0.0560 |
150 to 299 | −1.811‡ | 0.4171 | 0.54‡ | 0.0701 |
300+ | ||||
Specialty | ||||
Internal Medicine | ||||
Family Medicine | −1.182† | 0.3499 | 0.68‡ | 0.0687 |
Other Specialty | −0.829 | 0.7742 | 0.84 | 0.2193 |
Graduation Year | ||||
Pre-1980 | ||||
1980 to 1989 | −0.166 | 0.3834 | 1.090 | 0.1236 |
1990 to 2000 | −0.741 | 0.4086 | 0.972 | 0.1122 |
Post-2000 | −1.582* | 0.6339 | 0.717 | 0.1578 |
Practice Region | ||||
Northeast | ||||
Midwest | −2.752‡ | 0.4570 | 0.408‡ | 0.0606 |
South | 0.339 | 0.4870 | 1.062 | 0.1369 |
West | 0.03 | 0.5730 | 0.996 | 0.1529 |
Rural | −2.152‡ | 0.5269 | 0.43† | 0.1104 |
RuralXSpecialty | ||||
RuralXInternal Medicine | ||||
RuralXFamily Medicine | 0.764 | 0.5822 | 1.421 | 0.4270 |
RuralXOther Specialty | −0.831 | 1.2300 | 0.922 | 0.5493 |
Patient Characteristics | ||||
Age (years) | ||||
65 to 69 | ||||
70 to 74 | −0.037 | 0.0396 | 0.995 | 0.0105 |
75 to 79 | −0.064 | 0.0345 | 0.989 | 0.0102 |
80 to 84 | −0.131‡ | 0.0338 | 0.983 | 0.0102 |
85+ | −0.336‡ | 0.0248 | 0.923‡ | 0.0073 |
Female | −0.042† | 0.0154 | 0.984† | 0.0049 |
Race/Ethnicity | ||||
White | ||||
Black | −0.068‡ | 0.0116 | 0.985‡ | 0.0038 |
Other | −0.038 | 0.0202 | 0.991 | 0.0050 |
ElixHauser Comorbidity Index | ||||
0 | ||||
1 to 2 | 0.050* | 0.0236 | 1.015 | 0.0085 |
3 to 5 | 0.214‡ | 0.0307 | 1.058‡ | 0.0074 |
6+ | 0.307‡ | 0.0877 | 1.049‡ | 0.0107 |
Practice Location Characteristics | ||||
<12 years schooling | −0.096† | 0.0336 | 0.978* | 0.0105 |
Black | 0.051‡ | 0.0118 | 1.015‡ | 0.0037 |
Hispanic | 0.103‡ | 0.0159 | 1.028‡ | 0.0043 |
< 200% FPL | −0.077‡ | 0.0152 | 0.979‡ | 0.0050 |
Number of Observations | 6,905 |
OR, odds ratio; FLP, federal poverty line; OLS, ordinary least squares. Note: The dependent variable for Panel A was per-patient low value care (LVC) Medicare spending in dollar amounts, while the ORs in Panel B were calculated from logit regression results, where the dependent variable was equal to 1 if the primary care physician's (PCP) per-patient LVC Medicare spending was in the top quintile. RuralXSpecialty indicated a set of interaction terms between the rurality of PCP's practice location and PCP's specialty type. Practice was considered to be in a rural area if it was located in any of the six non-metropolitan county categories in the Rural Urban Continuum Code that divided all US counties into three metropolitan and six nonmetropolitan county categories. PCPs were categorized into three specialty types: those that practice internal medicine, family medicine, and other PCP specialties. Both models were estimated using sample weights that reflect the oversampling of physicians in smaller states.
↵* P < .05.
↵† P < .01.
↵‡ P < .001.