Table 2.

Unadjusted and Adjusted Models Predicting the Probability of Hospital Mortality for Urban Versus Rural Patients, 2008 and 2013

Model20082013
Urban(95% CI)Rural(95% CI)P ValueUrban(95% CI)Rural(95% CI)P Value
Unadjusted2.51%(2.40 to 2.62)2.66%(2.57 to 2.74)<.052.27%(2.22 to 2.32)2.66%(2.60 to 2.71)<.001
    Adjusted for chronic disease burden2.30%(2.24 to 2.44)2.60%(2.51 to 2.66)<.0011.80%(1.79 to 1.87)2.20%(2.14 to 2.24)<.001
    Adjusted for age2.04%(2.13 to 1.88)2.05%(1.97 to 2.13).9131.88%(1.84 to 1.92)2.06%(2.00 to 2.11)<.001
    Adjusted for sex2.51%(2.40 to 2.62)2.66%(2.57 to 2.74)<.052.27%(2.22 to 2.32)2.66%(2.60 to 2.71)<.001
    Adjusted for income2.50%(2.39 to 2.61)2.67%(2.59 to 2.79)<.012.26%(2.21 to 2.32)2.68%(2.61 to 2.74)<.001
    Adjusted for payer2.35%(2.25 to 2.45)2.34%(2.26 to 2.42).8632.09%(2.05 to 2.14)2.29%(2.23 to 2.34)<.001
Adjusted for chronic disease, age, sex, income, payer2.11%(2.02 to 2.20)2.13%(2.05 to 2.21).6651.76%(1.72 to 1.80)1.92%(1.87 to 1.97)<.001
  • P values reported measure the significance of the urban-rural comparison in 2008 and 2013.

  • CI, confidence interval.