TY - JOUR T1 - Practitioner Participation in National Dental Practice-based Research Network (PBRN) Studies: 12-Year Results JF - The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine JO - J Am Board Fam Med SP - 844 LP - 856 DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2018.06.180019 VL - 31 IS - 6 AU - Rahma Mungia AU - Ellen Funkhouser AU - Meredith K. Buchberg Trejo AU - Rachel Cohen AU - Stephanie C. Reyes AU - David L. Cochran AU - Sonia K. Makhija AU - Cyril Meyerowitz AU - Brad D. Rindal AU - Valeria V. Gordan AU - Jeffrey L. Fellows AU - Jason D. McCargar AU - Pamela A. McMahon AU - Gregg H. Gilbert AU - National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group Y1 - 2018/11/01 UR - http://www.jabfm.org/content/31/6/844.abstract N2 - Purpose: This study examines practitioner participation over 12 years in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN) studies and practitioner meetings, average length of participation, and association of practitioner- and practice-level characteristics with participation. Little information exists about practitioners' long-term participation in PBRNs.Methods: The network conducted a retrospective analysis of practitioner participation in 3 main network activities during 2005 to 2017. Practitioners who completed an enrollment questionnaire, practiced in the United States, and either attended a network meeting or received an invitation to complete a questionnaire or clinical study were included in the analysis. Practitioners (n = 3669) met inclusion criteria. The network implemented 38 studies (28 clinical and 10 questionnaire), 23 of which (15 clinical and 8 questionnaire) met the criteria for the current analysis.Results: Overall, 86% (N = 3148) participated in at least 1 network activity during 2005 to 2017. Questionnaire studies had the highest rate with 81% (N = 2963) completing at least 1, 21% (N = 762) completed at least 1 clinical study and 19% (N = 700) attended at least 1 network meeting. Among 1578 practitioners enrolled in the first 5 years of the Network launch, 20% (N = 320) participated in multiple network activities over 5 to 9 years, and 14% (N = 238) for 10 to 12 years. Practitioner characteristics associated with participation varied depending on the activity assessed.Conclusion: The network engaged practitioners in its research activities with relatively high participation rates over a 12-year period. Strategies employed by the network to engage practitioners may serve as a model for PBRN networks for other allied health professions. ER -