PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Angelique B. Bouma AU - Kristina Tiedje AU - Sara Poplau AU - Deborah H. Boehm AU - Nilay D. Shah AU - Matthew J. Commers AU - Mark Linzer AU - Victor M. Montori TI - Shared Decision Making in the Safety Net: Where Do We Go from Here? AID - 10.3122/jabfm.2014.02.130245 DP - 2014 Mar 01 TA - The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine PG - 292--294 VI - 27 IP - 2 4099 - http://www.jabfm.org/content/27/2/292.short 4100 - http://www.jabfm.org/content/27/2/292.full SO - J Am Board Fam Med2014 Mar 01; 27 AB - Background: Shared decision making (SDM) is an interactive process between clinicians and patients in which both share information, deliberate together, and make clinical decisions. Clinics serving safety net patients face special challenges, including fewer resources and more challenging work environments. The use of SDM within safety net institutions has not been well studied. Methods: We recruited a convenience sample of 15 safety net primary care clinicians (13 physicians, 2 nurse practitioners). Each answered a 9-item SDM questionnaire and participated in a semistructured interview. From the transcribed interviews and questionnaire data, we identified themes and suggestions for introducing SDM into a safety net environment. Results: Clinicians reported only partially fulfilling the central components of SDM (sharing information, deliberating, and decision making). Most clinicians expressed interest in SDM by stating that they “selected a treatment option together” with patients (8 of 15 in strong or complete agreement), but only a minority (3 of 15) “thoroughly weighed the different treatment options” together with patients. Clinicians attributed this gap to many barriers, including time pressure, overwhelming visit content, patient preferences, and lack of available resources. All clinicians believed that lack of time made it difficult to practice SDM. Conclusions: To increase use of SDM in the safety net, efficient SDM interventions designed for this environment, team care, and patient engagement in SDM will need further development. Future studies should focus on adapting SDM to safety net settings and determine whether SDM can reduce health care disparities.