PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Michael E. Bodner AU - Rowena J. Dolor AU - Truls Ǿstbye AU - Pauline Lyna AU - Stewart C. Alexander AU - James A. Tulsky AU - Kathryn I. Pollak TI - Accuracy and Congruence of Patient and Physician Weight-Related Discussions: From Project CHAT (Communicating Health: Analyzing Talk) AID - 10.3122/jabfm.2014.01.130110 DP - 2014 Jan 01 TA - The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine PG - 70--77 VI - 27 IP - 1 4099 - http://www.jabfm.org/content/27/1/70.short 4100 - http://www.jabfm.org/content/27/1/70.full SO - J Am Board Fam Med2014 Jan 01; 27 AB - Objective: Primary care providers should counsel overweight patients to lose weight. Rates of self-reported, weight-related counseling vary, perhaps because of self-report bias. We assessed the accuracy and congruence of weight-related discussions among patients and physicians during audio-recorded encounters. Methods: We audio-recorded encounters between physicians (n = 40) and their overweight/obese patients (n = 461) at 5 community-based practices. We coded weight-related content and surveyed patients and physicians immediately after the visit. Generalized linear mixed models assessed factors associated with accuracy. Results: Overall, accuracy was moderate: patient (67%), physician (70%), and congruence (62%). When encounters containing weight-related content were analyzed, patients (98%) and physicians (97%) were highly accurate and congruent (95%), but when weight was not discussed, patients and physicians were more inaccurate and incongruent (patients, 36%; physicians, 44%; 28% congruence). Physicians who were less comfortable discussing weight were more likely to misreport that weight was discussed (odds ratio, 4.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.88–10.75). White physicians with African American patients were more likely to report accurately no discussion about weight than white physicians with white patients (odds ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.13–0.69). Conclusion: Physician and patient self-report of weight-related discussions were highly accurate and congruent when audio-recordings indicated weight was discussed but not when recordings indicated no weight discussions. Physicians' overestimation of weight discussions when weight is not discussed constitutes missed opportunities for health interventions.