RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Prenatal Care And Low-Birth-Weight Rates In Urban And Rural Wisconsin
JF The Journal of the American Board of Family
                Practice
JO J Am Board Fam Med
FD American Board of Family Medicine
SP 17
OP 21
DO 10.3122/jabfm.8.1.17
VO 8
IS 1
A1 Hueston, William J.
YR 1995
UL http://www.jabfm.org/content/8/1/17.abstract
AB Background: The intent of this investigation was to study the distribution of obstetric providers and prenatal care utilization in Wisconsin and analyze the potential impact of these factors on the frequency of low birth weight. Methods: State perinatal vital statistics and physician professional association surveys were used to compare the frequency of low birth weight, physician distribution, and utilization of prenatal care in all 72 counties in Wisconsin. Results: Despite higher rates of suboptimal prenatal care utilization among women residing in rural counties, low-birth-weight rates were no different. Very-Iow-birth-weight rates were actually higher for residents of urban counties compared with those in rural counties. When low birth weight was examined based on the rate of suboptimal prenatal care, a positive association was found only for urban counties. In rural counties there was no increase in low-birth-weight rates as the use of prenatal care declined. Conclusions: Inadequate prenatal care appears to be associated with low-birth-weight rates, but less so for women residing in rural counties when compared with those in urban counties.