RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 How Reliable is Pain as the Fifth Vital Sign?
JF The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
JO J Am Board Fam Med
FD American Board of Family Medicine
SP 291
OP 298
DO 10.3122/jabfm.2009.03.080162
VO 22
IS 3
A1 Lorenz, Karl A.
A1 Sherbourne, Cathy D.
A1 Shugarman, Lisa R.
A1 Rubenstein, Lisa V.
A1 Wen, Li
A1 Cohen, Angela
A1 Goebel, Joy R.
A1 Hagenmeier, Emily
A1 Simon, Barbara
A1 Lanto, Andy
A1 Asch, Steven M.
YR 2009
UL http://www.jabfm.org/content/22/3/291.abstract
AB Background: Although many health care organizations require routine pain screening (eg, “5th vital sign”) with the 0 to 10 numeric rating scale (NRS), its accuracy has been questioned; here we evaluated its accuracy and potential causes for error.Methods: We randomly surveyed veterans and reviewed their charts after outpatient encounters at 2 hospitals and 6 affiliated community sites. Using correlation and receiver operating characteristic analysis, we compared the routinely measured “5th vital sign” (nurse-recorded NRS) with a research-administered NRS (research-recorded NRS) and the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI).Results: During 528 encounters, nurse-recorded NRS and research-recorded NRS correlated moderately (r = 0.627), as did nurse-recorded NRS and BPI severity scales (r = 0.613 for pain during the last 24 hours and r = 0.588 for pain during the past week). Correlation with BPI interference was lower (r = 0.409). However, the research-recorded NRS correlated substantially with the BPI severity during the past 24 hours (r = 0.870) and BPI severity during the last week (r = 0.840). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed similar results. Of the 98% of cases where a numeric score was recorded, 51% of patients reported their pain was rated qualitatively, rather than with a 0 to 10 scale, a practice associated with pain underestimation (χ2 = 64.04, P < .001).Conclusion: Though moderately accurate, the outpatient “5th vital sign” is less accurate than under ideal circumstances. Personalizing assessment is a common clinical practice but may affect the performance of research tools such as the NRS adopted for routine use.