PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Barry Knishkowy AU - Hava Patti AU - Moshe Schein AU - John Yaphe AU - Richard Edman AU - Mario Baras TI - Adolescent Preventive Health Visits: A Comparison of Two Invitation Protocols AID - 10.3122/jabfm.13.1.11 DP - 2000 Jan 01 TA - The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice PG - 11--16 VI - 13 IP - 1 4099 - http://www.jabfm.org/content/13/1/11.short 4100 - http://www.jabfm.org/content/13/1/11.full SO - J Am Board Fam Med2000 Jan 01; 13 AB - Background: Adolescent health care in family practice at times creates conflicting responsibilities for parents and their teenagers. In the context of a new adolescent preventive health program in a family practice setting, we compared attendance rates using two invitation protocols, the protocols differing in their emphasis on adolescent autonomy vs parental responsibility. Methods: One hundred six teenagers in the seventh and tenth grades were invited for preventive health visits with the family nurse and physician using two protocols. Protocol 1 involved obtaining parental consent before approaching the adolescent. With protocol 2, an invitation letter and parental consent form were mailed to the teenager, while a letter of explanation was sent concurrently to the parents. In each case, the letter of invitation was followed up by a telephone call for those who did not respond. The spontaneous response rate (a positive response after receiving the letter), agreement to attend rate (a positive response after receiving the letter or being telephoned), and the attendance rate were determined according to grade, sex, and protocol. Results: The spontaneous response rate was 21%, the agreement to attend rate was 75%, and the attendance rate was 44%. Attendance rates were higher for the girls compared with the boys (54% vs 35%, P = .08) and for the seventh graders compared with the tenth graders (53% vs 31%, P = .03). The spontaneous response rate was lower among the tenth graders using protocol 2 (8% vs 37.5% with protocol1, P = .04), while the agreement to attend rate and attendance rate did not differ for the two protocols. Conclusions: Nearly one half of this population of adolescents attended preventive health visits at the family nurse's and physician's initiative. A follow-up telephone call after the initial written invitation resulted in increased participation, while approaching the teenager or parent initially did not make a difference in attendance. This pilot study shows the potential for initiating an adolescent health program in the family practice setting.