%0 Journal Article %A Riti Shimkhada %A Jacqueline Miller %A Elizabeth Magnan %A Marykate Miller %A Janet Coffman %A Garen Corbett %T Policy Considerations for Routine Screening for Adverse Childhood Events (ACEs) %D 2022 %R 10.3122/jabfm.2022.04.210454 %J The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine %P 862-866 %V 35 %N 4 %X In October of 2021, California enacted SB 428, the ACEs Equity Act, which mandates commercial insurance coverage of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) screening in addition to ACEs screening already covered for the state's Medicaid enrollees. California is the first state to expand ACEs screening coverage, but it is possible other states may follow similar paths given the increasing interest in policy action to address ACEs. Increase in stress and trauma among Americans and evidence of the disproportionate impact ACEs have on historically marginalized and disadvantaged communities has increased the urgency with which policy makers, clinicians and researchers have sought to address ACEs and encourage trauma-informed care delivery to better meet the needs of patients. Family practice and other primary care providers are at the core of prevention and are arguably the largest group of stakeholders at the forefront of movements toward increasing ACEs screenings. However, debate persists among policy makers, clinicians, and researchers on whether the ACEs screening approach improves outcomes and avoids harms. In this health policy article, we describe key issues under debate with regards to ACEs screening and estimate potential change in screening utilization and expenditures due to the new ACEs legislation in California. The lessons being learned in California are applicable to other states and the US as a whole. %U https://www.jabfm.org/content/jabfp/35/4/862.full.pdf