@article {Dickinson675, author = {W. Perry Dickinson and Donald E. Nease, Jr. and Robert L. Rhyne and Kyle E. Knierim and Douglas H. Fernald and Dionisia R. de la Cerda and L. Miriam Dickinson}, title = {Practice Transformation Support and Patient Engagement to Improve Cardiovascular Care: From EvidenceNOW Southwest (ENSW)}, volume = {33}, number = {5}, pages = {675--686}, year = {2020}, doi = {10.3122/jabfm.2020.05.190395}, publisher = {The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine}, abstract = {Purpose: To improve cardiovascular care through supporting primary care practices{\textquoteright} adoption of evidence-based guidelines.Study Design: A cluster randomized trial compared two approaches: (1) standard practice support (practice facilitation, practice assessment with feedback, health information technology assistance, and collaborative learning sessions) and (2) standard support plus patient engagement support.Methods: Primary outcomes were cardiovascular clinical quality measures (CQMs) collected at baseline, 9 months, and 15 months. Implementation of the first 6 {\textquotedblleft}Building Blocks of High-Performing Primary Care{\textquotedblright} was assessed by practice facilitators at baseline and 3, 6, and 9 months. CQMs from practices not involved in the study served as an external comparison.Results: A total of 211 practices completed baseline surveys. There were no differences by study arm (odds ratio [95\% confidence interval]) for aspirin use (1.03 [0.99, 1.06]), blood pressure (0.98 [0.95, 1.01]), cholesterol (0.96 [0.92, 1.00]), and smoking (1.01 [0.96, 1.07]); however, there were significant improvements over time in aspirin use (1.04 [1.01, 1.07]), cholesterol (1.05 [1.03, 1.08]), and smoking (1.03 [1.01, 1.06]), but not blood pressure (1.01 [0.998, 1.03]). Improvement in enrolled practices was greater than external comparison practices across all 4 measures (all P \< .05). Implementation improved in both arms for Team-Based Care, Patient-Team Partnership, and Population Management, and improvement was greater in enhanced intervention practices (all P \< .05). Leadership and Data-Driven Improvement (P \< .05) improved significantly, with no difference by arm. A greater improvement in Building Block implementation was associated with a greater improvement in blood pressure measures (P \< .05).Conclusions: Practice transformation support can assist practices with improving quality of care. Patient engagement in practice transformation can further enhance practices{\textquoteright} implementation of aspects of new models of care.}, issn = {1557-2625}, URL = {https://www.jabfm.org/content/33/5/675}, eprint = {https://www.jabfm.org/content/33/5/675.full.pdf}, journal = {The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine} }