Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Editors' Blog
    • Email Alerts
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • About
    • The JABFM
    • Editorial Board
  • Classifieds
  • More
    • Email Alerts
    • Feedback
    • ABFM News
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Editors' Blog
    • Email Alerts
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • About
    • The JABFM
    • Editorial Board
  • Classifieds
  • More
    • Email Alerts
    • Feedback
    • ABFM News
    • Folders
    • Help
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
  • JABFM On Facebook

Reasons Older Veterans with Declining Health Use VA and Non-VA Care in an Urban Environment

Matthew R. Augustine, MD; Tanieka Mason, MPH; Abigail Baim-Lance, PhD; Kenneth Boockvar, MD

Corresponding Author: Matthew R. Augustine, MD; James J Peters VA Medical Center. Email: matthew.augustine2@va.gov

Section: Original Research

Publication: 3/18/2021

Background: Older veterans in urban settings rely less on Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care, suggesting deficits of access and services for aging veterans.  We aimed to identify reasons for VA and non-VA use across health status of older, urban-dwelling veterans. Methods: We examined open-ended responses from 177 veterans who were enrolled in primary care at the Bronx VA Medical Center, used non-VA care in prior 2 years, and completed baseline interviews in a care coordination trial from March 2016 to August 2017. Using content analysis, we coded and categorized key terms and concepts into an established access framework. This framework included five categories: acceptability (relationship, second opinion), accessibility (distance, travel); affordability; availability (supply, specialty care); and accommodation (organization, wait-time). Self-reported health status was stratified by excellent/very good, good, and fair/poor. Results: We were able to categorize the responses of 166 veterans, who were of older age (≥75 years, 61%), minority race and ethnicity (77%), and low income (<$25,000/year, 51%). Veterans mentioned acceptability (42%) and accessibility (37%) the most, followed by affordability (33%), availability (25%), and accommodation (11%).  With worse self-reported health status, accessibility intensified (Excellent/very good, 24%; Fair/Poor, 46%; p=0.031) particularly among minority veterans, while acceptability remained prominent (Excellent/very good, 49%; Fair/Poor, 37%; p=0.25). Other categories were mentioned less with no significant difference across health status. Conclusions: Even in an urban environment, proximity was a leading issue with worse health. Addressing urban accessibility and coordination for older, sicker veterans may enhance care for a growing vulnerable VA population. 

ABSTRACTS IN PRESS

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us

© 2021 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire