Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Special Collections
    • Abstracts In Press
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Special Collections
    • Abstracts In Press
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube

Primary Care Appointment Access by Patient’s Race, Gender, and Self-Advocacy Style

BRIEF REPORT

Hwayeon Myeong, MEd; Elisabeth R. Silver, PhD; Jazmin Argueta-Rivera, MA; Dillon Stewart, MA; Mikki Hebl, PhD; Eden B. King, PhD

Corresponding Author: Hwayeon Myeong, MEd; Department of Psychological Sciences, Rice University.

Email: hm60@rice.edu

DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2025.250377R1

Keywords: Access to Primary Care, Health Disparities, Insurance, Patient Appointments, Patient Education, Primary Health Care, Social Determinants of Health, Texas, Waiting Lists 

Dates: Submitted: 09-25-2025; Revised: 01-22-2026; Accepted: 02-16-2026 

Status: In Press.

OBJECTIVE: Emerging evidence suggests that inequities in healthcare access can occur during appointment scheduling. This study examined whether patient race, gender, and self-advocacy styles shape appointment access in primary care, and whether requesting an earlier appointment affects scheduling outcomes.

METHODS: In a telephone-based audit study, 24 trained research assistants used pseudonymous names signaling race and gender to pose as new patients calling primary care clinics in major metropolitan areas of Texas. Callers followed a standardized script to request an initial appointment and, after receiving an offer, were instructed to ask whether an earlier appointment was available using different self-advocacy styles. Of 5,760 call attempts, 798 calls met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Each call was coded for the appointment offers, wait times, and whether requests for an earlier appointment were accommodated.

RESULTS: Scheduling outcomes did not differ significantly by race, gender, or advocacy styles. However, when requests for earlier appointments were accommodated, callers received substantially shorter wait times, regardless of demographic characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS: Although we find no evidence of differential treatment based on perceived race, gender, or self-advocacy styles at the scheduling stage, requesting an earlier appointment was associated with meaningful reductions in wait time. These findings suggest that encouraging asking at the scheduling stage may help reduce disparities in timely access to primary care.

ABSTRACTS IN PRESS

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2026 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire