Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Special Collections
    • Abstracts In Press
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Special Collections
    • Abstracts In Press
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube

Patient Preferences for Loneliness Interventions in Adult Primary Care

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Caitlin Barba, MPH; Lina Brou, MPH, PhD; Miriam Dickinson, PhD; R. Scott Hammond, MD; Glenn Kotz, MD; Donald E. Nease, Jr., MD; Rebecca Mullen, MD, MPH

Corresponding Author: Rebecca Mullen, MD, MPH; Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado. 

Email: REBECCA.MULLEN@cuanschutz.edu

DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2025.250356R1

Keywords: Behavioral Science, Colorado, Loneliness, Patient Preference, Prevalence, Primary Health Care, Psychosocial Intervention, Social Problems, Surveys and Questionnaires

Dates: Submitted: 09-10-2025; Revised: 02-06-2026; Accepted: 02-23-2026      

Status: In Press.

BACKGROUND: The United States is currently experiencing a loneliness epidemic, yet little is known about patient preferences of loneliness interventions or if loneliness subtype (emotional/ social) influences intervention preference. This study describes the prevalence of loneliness in the primary care practice setting and patient interest in a list of loneliness interventions informed by a primary care clinic’s Patient Advisory Council.

METHODS: We conducted cross-sectional surveys of patients presenting for routine care in July 2019 and August 2021 of adults at 5-7 outpatient primary care practices in Colorado affiliated with the ART2 practice-based research network. The 6-item De Jong Gierveld was utilized to capture emotional and social loneliness.

RESULTS: The prevalence of loneliness was 45.7% (247/540) in the initial sample and 42.9% (228/531) in second sample, (p=.3559). Volunteering in the community was of interest to half of all participants, but there was less interest in this intervention with lonely participants. Talking to a therapist was the only intervention that participants with any loneliness subtype were more likely to be interested in than participants without loneliness, including social loneliness (aOR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.22, 3.42), emotional loneliness (aOR: 5.13, 95% CI: 3.05, 8.62), and social and emotional loneliness (aOR: 7.01, 95% CI: 4.52, 10.89).

CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that loneliness is common in adult primary care patients and that therapy is the intervention with the most significant interest among all loneliness subtypes (social loneliness, emotional loneliness, both loneliness types). Further patient-engagement work should emphasize loneliness intervention development and implementation in primary care.

ABSTRACTS IN PRESS

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2026 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire