Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Special Collections
    • Abstracts In Press
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Special Collections
    • Abstracts In Press
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube

Fewer Abortions in States with More Family Physicians

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Amanda Weidner, MPH

Corresponding Author: Amanda Weidner, MPH; University of Washington Department of Family Medicine. 

Email: aweidner@uw.edu

DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2025.250295R1

Keywords: Abortion, Access to Care, Family Physicians, Linear Regression, Primary Health Care, Secondary Data Analysis

Dates: Submitted: 07-31-2025; Revised: 11-05-2025; Accepted: 11-17-2025

Status: In Press.

PURPOSE: Primary care physicians providing abortion services could enhance access, particularly family physicians (FPs) who provide the majority of care in rural and underserved settings. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the association between the rate of abortions and availability of FPs by state.

METHODS: This was an exploratory ecological study with secondary data compiled from several sources by state in the United States. The primary dependent variable was abortion rate, and the primary independent variable was FPs per population, with internists and obstetrician/gynecologists (ob/gyns) analyzed as comparison. Other variables included pregnancies and abortion clinics per population; percent of a state’s population in rural areas; and state abortion law. Each comparison was analyzed with a two-tailed Pearson’s correlation test followed by multivariate linear regression.

RESULTS: Physicians per 100,000 population was significant in all three models when controlling for the other variables, but in different directions: more internists and more ob/gyns were associated with greater abortion rates (B=.253 (.037), p<.001 and B=.807(.174), p<.001), while more FPs were associated with lower abortion rates (B=-.212 (.064), p=.002). Each model was reliably predictive of abortion rates and explained most of the variance in abortion rates by state.

CONCLUSIONS: Fewer abortions in states with more FPs and more in states with ob/gyns and internists may suggest an access issue in the states with more FPs. FPs providing abortion care could be part of a solution to improving patient access particularly in rural areas.    

ABSTRACTS IN PRESS

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2026 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire