Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Brief ReportBrief Report

Examining Removal of Federal Waiver Restrictions to Prescribing Buprenorphine in Primary Care

Claire B. Simon, Chialing Hsu, Maria G. Prado, Imara I. West, Kwun C. G. Chan, Joseph W. LeMaster, Mary A. Hatch, Sebastian T. Tong and Kari A. Stephens
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine October 2025, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240453R1
Claire B. Simon
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington Seattle, Washington (CH, MGP, IIW, STT, KAS); Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington Seattle, Washington (KCGC); Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Kansas City, Kansas (JWL); Addictions, Drug & Alcohol Institute, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington (MAH); and Department of Biomedical Informatics & Medical Education, University of Washington (KAS).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chialing Hsu
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington Seattle, Washington (CH, MGP, IIW, STT, KAS); Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington Seattle, Washington (KCGC); Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Kansas City, Kansas (JWL); Addictions, Drug & Alcohol Institute, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington (MAH); and Department of Biomedical Informatics & Medical Education, University of Washington (KAS).
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria G. Prado
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington Seattle, Washington (CH, MGP, IIW, STT, KAS); Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington Seattle, Washington (KCGC); Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Kansas City, Kansas (JWL); Addictions, Drug & Alcohol Institute, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington (MAH); and Department of Biomedical Informatics & Medical Education, University of Washington (KAS).
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Imara I. West
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington Seattle, Washington (CH, MGP, IIW, STT, KAS); Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington Seattle, Washington (KCGC); Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Kansas City, Kansas (JWL); Addictions, Drug & Alcohol Institute, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington (MAH); and Department of Biomedical Informatics & Medical Education, University of Washington (KAS).
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kwun C. G. Chan
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington Seattle, Washington (CH, MGP, IIW, STT, KAS); Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington Seattle, Washington (KCGC); Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Kansas City, Kansas (JWL); Addictions, Drug & Alcohol Institute, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington (MAH); and Department of Biomedical Informatics & Medical Education, University of Washington (KAS).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph W. LeMaster
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington Seattle, Washington (CH, MGP, IIW, STT, KAS); Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington Seattle, Washington (KCGC); Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Kansas City, Kansas (JWL); Addictions, Drug & Alcohol Institute, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington (MAH); and Department of Biomedical Informatics & Medical Education, University of Washington (KAS).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary A. Hatch
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington Seattle, Washington (CH, MGP, IIW, STT, KAS); Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington Seattle, Washington (KCGC); Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Kansas City, Kansas (JWL); Addictions, Drug & Alcohol Institute, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington (MAH); and Department of Biomedical Informatics & Medical Education, University of Washington (KAS).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sebastian T. Tong
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington Seattle, Washington (CH, MGP, IIW, STT, KAS); Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington Seattle, Washington (KCGC); Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Kansas City, Kansas (JWL); Addictions, Drug & Alcohol Institute, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington (MAH); and Department of Biomedical Informatics & Medical Education, University of Washington (KAS).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kari A. Stephens
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington Seattle, Washington (CH, MGP, IIW, STT, KAS); Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington Seattle, Washington (KCGC); Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Kansas City, Kansas (JWL); Addictions, Drug & Alcohol Institute, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington (MAH); and Department of Biomedical Informatics & Medical Education, University of Washington (KAS).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Buprenorphine reduces the mortality associated with opioid use disorder (OUD) and may be prescribed in primary care. In January 2023, the requirement for a federal waiver to prescribe buprenorphine for OUD was removed. This study examines the impact of the waiver removal on buprenorphine prescribing in primary care.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study used electronic health record data from 32 primary care clinics in Washington and Idaho. The sample included all patients 18 or older who had a primary care visit between January 2022 and December 2023. We described the number of patients who received buprenorphine in the year prior and the year following the removal of the waiver. We used generalized estimating equations with exchangeable correlation structure to estimate the odds ratio of receiving buprenorphine after the removal of the federal waiver.

Results: A total of 56,003 patients met inclusion criteria and were included in the sample. The overall sample was 58.9% female, 75.8% White and mean age was 49.3 years. During the 2-year study period, 986 (1.8%) patients received buprenorphine. In our sample, we did not find a significant change in buprenorphine prescribing the year after the removal of the federal waiver after adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics (OR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.98-1.20). No significant interactions were found between the time period relative to the federal waiver removal and sociodemographic characteristics.

Conclusions: Buprenorphine prescribing did not increase the year after the removal of the federal waiver, suggesting this regulatory change was insufficient to increase buprenorphine prescribing in primary care.

  • Buprenorphine
  • Cohort Studies
  • Electronic Health Records
  • Health Policy
  • Idaho
  • Odds Ratio
  • Opioid-Related Disorders
  • Primary Health Care
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Washington

Introduction

The opioid crisis has transformed over the past decade and overdose deaths remain at record high levels.1 Treatment with buprenorphine improves health outcomes,2 decreases mortality3 and is the most effective treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) available in primary care.4 Buprenorphine treatment has been effectively implemented in many primary care settings yet most primary care providers still do not prescribe buprenorphine.5 Until recently physicians were required to complete 8-hours of additional training (or 24 hours if a nurse practitioner or physician assistant) and obtain a waiver from the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to prescribe buprenorphine for OUD. In January 2023, the requirement for a waiver was eliminated6 and additional training to prescribe buprenorphine was no longer required. Removal of the waiver eliminated a barrier for prescribers to increase treatment of buprenorphine for OUD, particularly in primary care by nonspecialists. In national samples across treatment settings, no meaningful increase in buprenorphine prescribing after the removal of the waiver was found,7–11 but the impact on primary care remains to be examined. The aim of this study was to describe buprenorphine prescribing before and after the removal of the waiver in primary care clinics and patients across two states.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study used electronic health record data from 20 primary care clinics in Washington and 12 primary care clinics in Idaho. The sample included all primary care patients 18 or older who had a primary care encounter between January 2022 and December 2023. The primary outcome was receipt of buprenorphine based on buprenorphine orders in the medical record. Patients were not required to have a diagnosis of OUD in the medical record as substance use disorders are often are underrecognized, particularly in some minoritized groups.12 We used descriptive statistics to describe patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and the number of patients who received at least one buprenorphine prescription in the one year before the removal of the federal waiver (January 1, 2022–December 31, 2022) and the one year following removal of the federal waiver (January 1, 2023–December 31, 2032). We used generalized estimating equations (GEE) with exchangeable correlation structure to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of receiving buprenorphine after removal of the waiver compared with before removal of the waiver controlling for age, sex, race, ethnicity, patient rurality,13 comorbidity14 and social deprivation.15 To further examine the association between the removal of the waiver and receipt of buprenorphine, we tested the interaction between each sociodemographic factors (age, sex, race, ethnicity, patient rurality,13 comorbidity14 and social deprivation15) and the time period relative to the removal of the waiver, fitting separate models for each sociodemographic factor without adjusting for additional covariates. Statistical analyses were performed using R version 4.3.1. This study was approved by the University of Washington Institutional Review Board.

Results

A total of 56,003 patients met inclusion criteria and were included in the sample. The overall sample was 58.9% female and 75.8% White, and mean age was 49.3 years. The sample was 97.6% urban and had a mean comorbidity score of 1.37. During the two-year study period, 986 patients (1.8%) received buprenorphine, 78.1% of whom had an OUD diagnosis documented in the medical record. Table 1 describes the overall sample and the sample that received buprenorphine. Of these patients who received buprenorphine, 735 received buprenorphine in the year before the removal of the waiver and 812 in the year after the removal of the waiver. There were no statistically significant differences in patient characteristics between the patients who received buprenorphine in the one year before the removal of the waiver compared with the 1 year after.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Characteristics of All Primary Care Patients versus Primary Care Patients Who Received Buprenorphine (2022–2023)

We found no significant change in buprenorphine prescribing in the one year after the removal of the waiver after adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics. Buprenorphine prescribing after the removal of the waiver trended up, but this finding was not statistically significant so may have been due to random variation (OR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.98-1.20).

We found no significant interactions between the time period relative to the federal waiver removal and sociodemographic characteristics (Figure 1). After the removal of the waiver, buprenorphine prescribing trended up in Asian patients, whereas buprenorphine prescribing trended down in non-White and non-Hispanic patients, but these findings were not statistically significant.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

Forest plot of interactions of sociodemographic characteristics on buprenorphine prescribing for after waiver removal versus before waiver removal. Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, Confidence Interval.

Discussion

In this sample of primary care patients less than 2 percent of patients received buprenorphine during the 2 year study period. Buprenorphine prescribing did not significantly increase in the year after removal of the federal waiver suggesting this regulatory change was not sufficient to cause a short-term increase buprenorphine prescribing in primary care. This is consistent with the literature in general populations7–11 and supports the need to address additional barriers to increasing buprenorphine prescribing in primary care.16

Barriers to increasing buprenorphine prescribing in primary care exist at the patient level (stigma, misinformation, negative previous treatment experiences, care that is not patient centered),17–20 provider level (stigma, inadequate training, time constraints)17 and health systems level (lack of behavioral health services, lack of institutional support, health care inequities).21 Given a comprehensive, multi-level approach is likely needed, future research should identify and test strategies to address these multilevel barriers.22

This study had several important limitations. The time window may not have been not long enough to detect the full impact of the removal of the waiver as it generally takes longer than one year to see a change in practice.23 While the sample included a clinics across 2 states, the sample was predominantly urban and findings may not generalize to other regions or in rural areas where access to buprenorphine is more limited.24 Future studies should examine the impact of the removal of the federal waiver in a primary care sample that it more rural and geographically diverse. The mean comorbidity score in the sample was low so findings may not generalize to other patient populations who may be more medically complex. We did not require patients who received buprenorphine to also have a diagnosis of OUD to be included in analyses so some patients in our sample may have been receiving buprenorphine for pain only. Since the waiver did not impact buprenorphine prescribing for pain this could have led to us failing to detect a change in buprenorphine prescribing for OUD. Our analyses did not control for additional factors that may have contributed to changes in buprenorphine prescribing during the study period, such as changes in the drug supply (eg, the rise of fentanyl) and late impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic that may have impacted health care utilization and access to buprenorphine. Our study examined buprenorphine prescribing at the patient level, future research could explore the impact of the waiver removal at the provider level.

While regulatory changes removing waiver requirements allowed any clinician with a DEA license to prescribe buprenorphine for OUD, this change was not associated with significant increases in buprenorphine prescribing in primary care. To improve health outcomes and decrease mortality associated with OUD, future research should explore approaches to identifying and overcoming barriers to prescribing buprenorphine in primary care while simultaneously addressing equity issues in buprenorphine treatment.

Notes

  • This article was externally peer reviewed.

  • Conflict of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

  • Funding: This study was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (UG1DA013714, R25DA033211) and the National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH020021) and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR002319).

  • Received for publication December 14, 2024.
  • Revision received April 4, 2025.
  • Accepted for publication April 21, 2025.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Spencer MR,
    2. Garnett MF,
    3. Miniño AM
    . Drug overdose deaths in the United States, 2002–2022. NCHS Data Briefs 2023.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Mattick RP,
    2. Breen C,
    3. Kimber J,
    4. Davoli M
    . Buprenorphine maintenance versus placebo or methadone maintenance for opioid dependence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;2014:CD002207.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Larochelle MR,
    2. Bernson D,
    3. Land T,
    4. et al
    . Medication for opioid use disorder after nonfatal opioid overdose and association with mortality: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2018;169:137–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Levin JS,
    2. Landis RK,
    3. Sorbero M,
    4. Dick AW,
    5. Saloner B,
    6. Stein BD
    . Differences in buprenorphine treatment quality across physician provider specialties. Drug Alcohol Depend 2022;237:109510.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Peterson LE,
    2. Morgan ZJ,
    3. Borders TF
    . Practice predictors of buprenorphine prescribing by family physicians. J Am Board Fam Med 2020;33:118–23.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    117th Congress. Consolidated Appropriations Act. H.R. 2617. January 3, 2023. Available at: https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr2617/BILLS-117hr2617enr.pdf.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Roy PJ,
    2. Suda K,
    3. Luo J,
    4. et al
    . Buprenorphine dispensing before and after the April 2021 X-Waiver exemptions: an interrupted time series analysis. Int J Drug Policy 2024;126:104381.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.
    1. Qian J,
    2. Khatiwada AP,
    3. Xue X
    . Did the 2021 federal change in the practice guidelines for the administration of buprenorphine for treating opioid use disorder increase buprenorphine prescription dispensing in Medicaid population? Am J Addict 2024;33:335–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.
    1. Chua KP,
    2. Bicket MC,
    3. Bohnert ASB,
    4. Conti RM,
    5. Lagisetty P,
    6. Nguyen TD
    . Buprenorphine dispensing after elimination of the waiver requirement. N Engl J Med 2024;390:1530–2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.
    1. Ali MM,
    2. Chen J,
    3. Novak PJ
    . Utilization of buprenorphine for opioid use disorder after the practitioner waiver removal. Am J Prev Med. 2025;68:207–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Christine PJ,
    2. Chahine RA,
    3. Kimmel SD,
    4. et al
    . Buprenorphine prescribing characteristics following relaxation of x-waiver training requirements. JAMA Netw Open 2024;7:e2425999.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Williams EC,
    2. Fletcher OV,
    3. Frost MC,
    4. Harris AHS,
    5. Washington DL,
    6. Hoggatt KJ
    . Comparison of substance use disorder diagnosis rates from electronic health record data with substance use disorder prevalence rates reported in surveys across sociodemographic groups in the veterans health administration. JAMA Netw Open 2022;5:e2219651.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    U.S. Department of Agriculture. Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes. 2019.
  14. 14.↵
    1. Quan H,
    2. Li B,
    3. Couris CM,
    4. et al
    . Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol . 2011;173:676–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Butler DC,
    2. Petterson S,
    3. Phillips RL,
    4. Bazemore AW
    . Measures of social deprivation that predict health care access and need within a rational area of primary care service delivery. Health Serv Res 2013;48:539–59.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. LeFevre N,
    2. St Louis J,
    3. Worringer E,
    4. Younkin M,
    5. Stahl N,
    6. Sorcinelli M
    . The end of the x-waiver: excitement, apprehension, and opportunity. J Am Board Fam Med 2023;36:867–72.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Mackey K,
    2. Veazie S,
    3. Anderson J,
    4. Bourne D,
    5. Peterson K
    . Barriers and facilitators to the use of medications for opioid use disorder: a rapid review. J Gen Intern Med 2020;35:954–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.
    1. Tofighi B,
    2. Williams AR,
    3. Chemi C,
    4. Suhail-Sindhu S,
    5. Dickson V,
    6. Lee JD
    . Patient barriers and facilitators to medications for opioid use disorder in primary care. Subst Use Misuse 2019;54:2409–19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.
    1. Hall NY,
    2. Le L,
    3. Majmudar I,
    4. Mihalopoulos C
    . Barriers to accessing opioid substitution treatment for opioid use disorder: a systematic review from the client perspective. Drug Alcohol Depend 2021;221:108651.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Jaffe K,
    2. Slat S,
    3. Chen L,
    4. Macleod C,
    5. Bohnert A,
    6. Lagisetty P
    . Perceptions around medications for opioid use disorder among a diverse sample of U.S. adults. J Subst Use Addict Treat 2024;163:209361.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Magee T,
    2. Peters C,
    3. Jacobsen SM,
    4. et al
    . Inequities in the treatment of opioid use disorder: a scoping review. J Subst Use Addict Treat 2023;152:209082.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Samuels EA,
    2. Martin AF
    . Beyond the waiver: multilevel interventions needed to expand buprenorphine treatment. JAMA Netw Open 2022;5:e2212425.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Rubin R
    . It takes an average of 17 years for evidence to change practice--the burgeoning field of implementation science seeks to speed things up. JAMA 2023;329:1333–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Amiri S,
    2. McDonell MG,
    3. Denney JT,
    4. Buchwald D,
    5. Amram O
    . Disparities in access to opioid treatment programs and office-based buprenorphine treatment across the rural-urban and area deprivation continua: a US nationwide small area analysis. Value Health 2021;24:188–95.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 38 (3)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 38, Issue 3
May-June 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Examining Removal of Federal Waiver Restrictions to Prescribing Buprenorphine in Primary Care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Examining Removal of Federal Waiver Restrictions to Prescribing Buprenorphine in Primary Care
Claire B. Simon, Chialing Hsu, Maria G. Prado, Imara I. West, Kwun C. G. Chan, Joseph W. LeMaster, Mary A. Hatch, Sebastian T. Tong, Kari A. Stephens
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Oct 2025, DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2024.240453R1

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Examining Removal of Federal Waiver Restrictions to Prescribing Buprenorphine in Primary Care
Claire B. Simon, Chialing Hsu, Maria G. Prado, Imara I. West, Kwun C. G. Chan, Joseph W. LeMaster, Mary A. Hatch, Sebastian T. Tong, Kari A. Stephens
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Oct 2025, DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2024.240453R1
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) Adoption, Policies, and Goals in Family Medicine: A Survey of Department Chairs
  • Estimating National and Regional Primary Care Spending in the Veterans Health Administration in 2022
Show more Brief Report

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Buprenorphine
  • Cohort Studies
  • Electronic Health Records
  • Health Policy
  • Idaho
  • Odds Ratio
  • Opioid-Related Disorders
  • Primary Health Care
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Washington

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire